Massive Thrombophlebitis as a Complication after Carpal Tunnel Release: Comorbid Factors?

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0427/011

Massive Thrombophlebitis as a Complication after Carpal Tunnel Release: Comorbid Factors?

  • Liselore Maeckelbergh 1*
  • Jan Noyez 1
  • Arne Decramer 1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium. 

*Corresponding Author: Liselore Maeckelbergh, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium.

Citation: Liselore Maeckelbergh, Jan Noyez,Arne Decramer. Massive Thrombophlebitis as a Complication after Carpal Tunnel Release: Comorbid Factors?. Jr of Orthopaedics and Surgical Sports Medicine. 1(3); Doi: 10.31579/2641-0427/011.

Copyright: © 2018 Liselore Maeckelbergh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 02 November 2018 | Accepted: 10 December 2018 | Published: 12 December 2018

Keywords: Carpal Tunnel; thrombophlebitis; clinical diagnosis

Abstract

Seven days before the patient had an endoscopic carpal tunnel release under locoregional anesthesia. We performed a single-portal technique as described by Agee. The patient was positioned in dorsal decubitus with this right arm on a side table. The arm tourniquet was inflated to a pressure 100mmHg above systolic blood pressure. The tourniquet was inflated after draping and was released after suture. The vertical incision was located radiocarpal along the ulnar border of the musculus palmaris longus. A proximal based flap of the superficial fascia is created and elevated. A blunt probe was used to gently probe the undersurface of the ligament. Sequentially larger dilators are passed into the carpal tunnel. The arthroscope with the blade is passed in and the dissection of the ligamentum transversum carpi is made. The incision is closed with resorbable sutures after which a compressive bandage is applied.

Case Report

A 68-year old male cyclist was seen at the consultation seven days after upper limb surgery.

Seven days before the patient had an endoscopic carpal tunnel release under locoregional anesthesia. We performed a single-portal technique as described by Agee. The patient was positioned in dorsal decubitus with this right arm on a side table. The arm tourniquet was inflated to a pressure 100mmHg above systolic blood pressure. The tourniquet was inflated after draping and was released after suture. The vertical incision was located radiocarpal along the ulnar border of the musculus palmaris longus. A proximal based flap of the superficial fascia is created and elevated. A blunt probe was used to gently probe the undersurface of the ligament. Sequentially larger dilators are passed into the carpal tunnel. The arthroscope with the blade is passed in and the dissection of the ligamentum transversum carpi is made. The incision is closed with resorbable sutures after which a compressive bandage is applied.

The patient presented with pain at the ulnar side of the forearm distal of the cubital tunnel seven days after surgery. The patient had been using Testocap® (testosterone undecanoate), otherwise no specific medical history.  Physical examination showed only a painful nodule at the forearm. There were no signs of infections or hematoma. Technical investigation with ultrasound shows a large superficial phlebothrombosis of the vena basilica with a length of 5 centimeters proximal of the elbow, reaching over the elbow joint 15 centimeters distally with limited inflammation of the subcutaneous fat. After consultation with the vascular surgeons the treatment consisted of low molecular weight heparins (Fraxodi® 0.6ml) for 10 days, after which Fraxiparine® 0.6 ml was given.

Three weeks later the patient was seen again. Ultrasound showed limited thickening of the vena basilica, reaching over the elbow joint. No signs of inflammation. We continued treatment with low molecular weight heparins for another three weeks.

Literature

Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT), although not as common as its lower-extremity counterpart, is a clinical entity with potentially devastating complications. A small percentage of all DVT cases involve the upper extremity, and some of these cases are complicated by pulmonary embolism. Prompt diagnosis with duplex ultrasonography and subsequent anticoagulation are the gold standards for identification and treatment. The majority of these cases are secondary to medical comorbidities. Although rare, several case reports of orthopedic-related upper-extremity DVT are presented in the literature.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequently encountered compression neuropathy of the upper extremity with a prevalence of 1 percent in the general population.  (1)

CTS is caused by compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel at the wrist and produces pain, paresthesia and hypoesthesia in the hand. The severity of CTS ranges from mild to severe.

Mild CTS presents with intermittent symptoms of paresthesia and numbness, often at night. Severe CTS may cause permanent atrophy of the thenar muscles innervated by the median nerve and permanent loss of sensation in the median nerve distribution in the hand. CTS is a clinical diagnosis. Electrophysiological tests (nerve conduction studies) are performed to support the clinical diagnosis.

The first open carpal tunnel release is credited to Learmonth in 1929 and was later popularized by Phalen et al. in the 1950s. The open carpal tunnel is seen as the standard of care for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome because of extensive anatomical exposure. This results in an efficacious and safe release of the transverse carpal ligament. Commonly reported complications of the open technique include hypertrophic or painful scar, pillar pain, slow return of pinch and grip strength and slow return to activities of daily living or work.  Endoscopic carpal tunnel release had been developed in principle to obviate these problems. The initial description was in 1989 by Okutsu et al. Endoscopic approaches appear to offer potential advantages related to reduced scarring, minimized postoperative pain, less initial loss of grip and pinch strength, faster recovery and better cosmesis. (2, 3) There is discussion about the safety regarding this technique with reports of an increased rate of major neurovascular injuries.

Superficial thrombophlebitis can occur spontaneously, especially in the lower extremities in the greater saphenous vein, or as a complication of medical or surgical interventions. Although the ethology is frequently obscure, superficial venous thrombosis is most often associated with one of the components of the Virchow triad: intima damage, stasis or turbulent flow, or changes in blood constituents. The superficial thrombophlebitis presents as redness and tenderness along the course of the vein, usually accompanied by swelling. Bleeding also can occur at the site of a varicose vein. Superficial thrombophlebitis of the upper extremities usually occurs at infusion or trauma sites.  A deep venous thrombosis should be excluded. Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis is aimed at patient comfort and preventing involvement of the deep veins.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can cause severe morbidity and mortality. (3, 4, 5) DVT and consequent pulmonary embolism (PE) usually occur after pelvic fractures, prolonged lower extremity surgeries and long-term immobilization periods. It is seen less common (1-2% of all DVTs) in the upper than the lower extremities.

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis refers to throm­bosis of the brachial, subclavian and/or axillary veins and accounts for up to 11% of all cases of deep venous throm­bosis.  Usually, the thrombotic process involves more than one venous segment, with the subclavian vein most fre­quently affected. The internal jugular vein, the brachio­cephalic vein and the basilic vein each are additionally involved in 20–30% of patients with upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis can be classified as primary of secondary. It is classified as secondary in the presence of known endogenous or exoge­nous risk factors. The secondary form accounts for about two-thirds of the upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and usually affects older patients with severe comorbidities. The most important risk factor for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis is the presence of an indwelling central venous catheter, malignancy, upper extremity immobilization by plaster casts or following arm surgery.

Patients suffering from upper extremity deep venous throm­bosis most commonly present with edematous swelling of the affected arm and/or upper extremity discomfort or pain.  Other clinical features such as cyanosis, visible collateral veins at the shoulder girdle or jugular distension are less frequently found.

Although the exact mechanism is not known, several studies have shown an association between anabolic steroids and cardiovascular events. (6,7) In particular, atherogenic and thrombogenic effects of anabolic steroids as well as vasospastic and direct effects on myocardial damage have been described. Anabolic steroids may be the main reason or contributor of cardiovascular events. Chronic use of anabolic steroids may lead to hypertension, reduction in HDL cholesterol level and endothelial dysfunction, which are known to play part in the development of atherosclerosis. Increased thromboxane A2 receptor density, decreased production of prostaglandins, and increased levels of homocysteine and clotting factors have been found to be the leading mechanisms for arterial thrombosis, even in young healthy athletes.  In addition to quantitative changes in the levels of anticoagulant and procoagulant factors, it has been shown that there is increased platelet sensitivity to collagens. 

It is difficult to come to any definitive conclusions regarding the risk of venous thrombosis engendered by using a tourniquet. (8) The pneumatic tourniquet was introduced in 1904 by Harvey Cushing to maintain a bloodless filed during extremity surgery. Using a tourniquet is sometimes a necessity, and the possibility of deep venous thrombosis may become a relatively minor consideration when set against the need to provide the optimum conditions for essential surgery. But exsanguination and use of a tourniquet increases the change of thrombus formation.  Kroese and Stiris advises to avoid using a tourniquet in patients with particular risk, such as a history of venous thrombosis and patients with trauma to the lower limb. (9, 10)

The most common complications in the clinical setting are neural complications, including ischemic neuropathy and compressive neurapraxia. Tourniquets may also cause direct vascular injury, particularly if the vessel wall is diseased. The tourniquet induces venous stasis and increased platelet adhesion in the valve pockets after distal limb ischemia.

Two hours or more of sustained ischemia during extremity surgery may lead to “post tourniquet syndrome”, which is characterized by edema, stiffness, pallor, weakness without paralysis and numbness.  The post tourniquet syndrome usually resolves within 1 week, although the recovery period may be prolonged.

Several prospective randomized clinical trials have shown no significant long-term deleterious effects of using them in extremity surgery.

Vascular complications are rare but potentially devastating events that are reported with varying frequencies during upper extremity regional anaesthesia. (11) Transient vascular insufficiency is a reported complication of brachial plexus blocks, occurring in up to 1% of patients. Vasospasm may follow arterial puncture or be a consequence of local anaesthetic-induced vasoconstriction. The risk of hematoma immediately after brachial plexus techniques is small (0.001%–0.02%), although the incidence may increase at 1-month follow-up. Although most are inconsequential, hematomas have or have not been associated with postoperative paraesthesia or transient nerve injury. Pseudoaneurysm formation is another rare complication of brachial plexus block. Pressure-induced neural ischemia with subsequent neurological impairment may occur because of the close proximity of neurovascular structures within the axilla. Axillary artery dissection can result from intramural injection of local anaesthetic. In summary, vascular complications are rare after brachial plexus blockade but must be considered in patients with postoperative neurological impairment. Early recognition and prompt surgical intervention are critical to avoid long-lasting neurological sequelae.

Complication after upper extremity deep venous throm­bosis is the post-thrombotic syndrome. (2,3) This is a chronic complication leading to signifi­cant functional disability and impaired quality of life, in par­ticular when occurring in the dominant arm. Symptoms include edema, persistent pain or heaviness of the affected arm, limb fatigue with exertion, skin discoloration and dis­tended collateral veins in the shoulder region. The 2-year cumulative incidence rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism after a first episode of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis range between 4% and 8%.  The actual incidence of pulmonary embolism resulting from upper extremity deep venous thrombosis is between 3% and 12%.

Although it is generally accepted that, as for patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, patients with (symptomatic) thrombosis of the arm veins require antico­agulant treatment. (2,3) This prevents thrombus propagation and pul­monary embolism. But the optimal treatment duration and intensity is not determined in randomized control­led trials. The current guidelines recommend initial treat­ment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin, followed by vitamin K antagonists.

In a case report by Singh et al., left proximal subclavian vein thrombosis was diagnosed in a 27-year-old male three days after a soft tissue injury in the left shoulder. (12) Urokinase was administered for the first 24 hours and treatment was continued with intravenous heparin and oral warfarin. Oral anticoagulation was continued for 12 months. The patient’s symptoms resolved after the third month of medication.

Another case report by Basat et al, shows a 54-year-old male patient were pulmonary embolism with thrombus at the right brachial vein was diagnosed after a surgical treatment for ulnar pseudarthrosis. The patient was heparinized and on the second day LMW heparins were administered. (13)

Peivandi presented a 25-year-old man with a simple displaced clavicle fracture at the middle third. (14) One week after trauma he was diagnosed with thrombus extending from the brachial axillary veins to the distal subclavian vein. Treatment with anticoagulation therapy was started.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is important to be aware of this unusual but potentially serious complication, as early diagnosis and treatment may limit morbidity and mortality. (15) We must be aware of the symptoms of deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity, and have a high index of suspicion.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao