AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/068
1 Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González”, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon (U.A.N.L.), Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
2 Department of Dermatology, University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González”,Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon (U.A.N.L.), Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
*Corresponding Author: Laura Mariel González-Cárdenas M.D, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital
Citation: Laura C, Gloria M, Erika L, Manuel E, Dariela E, et al. (2020). Validation And Transcultural Adaptation Of Hemangiomas Severity Scale.Journal of Dermatology and Dermatitis.5 (2); Doi:10.31579/2578-8949/068
Copyright: © rdenas, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 11 June 2020 | Accepted: 23 June 2020 | Published: 27 June 2020
Keywords: childhood; hemangioma severity scale; infantile hemangiomas; mexican population; pediatrics
Introduction: Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign soft tissue tumors in pediatrics, with a general incidence of 3-10% of the population. The Hemangioma Severity Scale was formulated by Haggstrom et al 2012, to measure the severity of hemangiomas according to the identification of clinical variables, assigning morbidity values associated with already published variables and in the clinical experience of experts on the subject. However, it has been designed and developed in the American population. Therefore, the objective of this study was to validate and translate the Hemangioma Severity Scale for its application in Mexican pediatric patients.
Materials and methods: The hemangioma severity scale was applied by 2 expert pediatric dermatology subspecialists, and then the responses were compared using correlation indices by a statistician who was biased.
Results: A coefficient was performed on the first item, an index of 0.714 was obtained. The following items obtained a 0.799 for the location, a 1 for the risk of structural abnormalities, 0.516 for complications, 0.298 for the item of pain and in the general risk and probability of deformation a kappa index of 0.670 was obtained.
Conclusions: The application of the Hemangiomas Severity Scale in pediatric patients is a useful and reproducible tool with great clinical applicability in our population.
Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most common benign soft tissue tumors in pediatrics, with a general incidence of 3-10% of the general population [1,2]. Despite being a widely used term in medicine, the concept of hemangioma is confusing. The term is commonly used to name different types of vascular type tumors as well as vascular malformations [3]. In 1996 the International Society for the Study of Vascular Abnormalities (ISSVA) classified abnormalities in malformations and proliferative vascular lesions. This classification was unofficially adopted. And updated in recent years [3]. There are various predisposing risk factors such as female sex, preterm products, low weight, multiple pregnancies, advanced maternal age, and placental abnormalities. These lesions are not observed at birth, they are usually diagnosed at 4-6 weeks of life with a maximum growth peak at 5 months of age with progressive involution [1,4].
Approximately 12% of hemangiomas present complications, requiring the evaluation of a specialist, leaving permanent sequelae in some cases [5]. Severe cases that require specialized therapy include those lesions that due to their location or distribution can be life-threatening (subglottic, multifocal with visceral involvement), jeopardize function (peri-orifices), cause ulcerations or bleeding (lumbosacral or genital) or are at risk of (facial) disfigurement [6].
Historically, treatment for IH consisted of systemic therapy with glucocorticoids, interferon alfa, and vincristine, but the efficacy of the treatment was variable and the safety of drugs in childhood was not fully understood [7]. Starting in 2008, the use of propanolol began effectively, considering it as a first-line treatment for IH. [6] Several scales have been developed to determine the severity of hemangiomas. The Hemangioma Severity Scale (HSS) was formulated by a multi-institutional group made up of 14 pediatric dermatologists and 1 hemato-oncologist at 9 academic medical centers in the United States [1]. Creating a scale that measures the severity of hemangiomas according to the identification of clinical variables, assigning morbidity values associated with already published variables and in the clinical experience of experts on the subject [8]. This scale was validated for the US population and was applied in 20 patients by 15 evaluators and consists of the following points: Size, location, risk of associated structural abnormalities, complications, pain, risk / probability of disfigurement in the face-ear, risk / probability of disfigurement in areas outside the ear [1].
The use of scales is important because they allow obtaining results to support clinical decisions about a patient's disease, understanding a phenomenon and knowing its behavior [9,10]. In Mexico, there is no scale that appropriately evaluated the severity of hemangiomas. It is usually reserved for the clinical experience of the treating physician and with the use of scales not validated in our context and culture. Therefore, the objective of this study is to validate and translate the HSS for application in national pediatric patients.
Cross-sectional study with a descriptive, observational and cross-sectional design in which 20 patients were included, who attended the pediatric consultation and the diagnosis of hemangioma was made at the University Hospital “Dr. José E. González” from UANL for evaluation, as well as validation and translation of the HSS.
The inclusion criteria used in this study were: Pediatric patients between 0 to 6 years old, patients with a diagnosis of Infantile hemangioma and those who agreed to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria that were taken into account were: Alteration that modifies the anatomy of the area of the injury, medical or surgical procedures that modify the injuries, having traumatic injuries in the areas of the hemangioma, that the patient does not agree to participate in the study and patients too restless who did not allow taking the photograph.
The elimination criteria were: voluntary withdrawal of the patient from the study by the parents and diagnosis of some other pathology that required immediate evaluation.
The sample was calculated based on the recommendations of the World Health Organization for the process of validation and translation of instruments in medicine. A minimum of 10 patients was considered recommended for each section used in the surveys. Therefore, 20 patients were included in the evaluation because two sections were included. The sample was obtained for convenience without being randomized in sequential cases.
The hemangioma severity scale was translated from the original language (English) to the Spanish language, spoken in Mexico, by a certified bilingual native translator. After translation, the investigator-in-charge made a summary of the adjustments to be corrected. Relevant corrections were made for the production of the final version of the scale.
The scale was applied and performed by two specialists in pediatric dermatology. It was applied in the presence of the patient for the direct evaluation of hemangiomas. The evaluation was carried out individually by each of the evaluators. There was no communication between the two, during the first time consultation or follow-up of children with the diagnosis of hemangioma. Parents were asked permission to perform the hemangioma severity scale, which consists of identifying the lesion, its location and involvement of structures, as well as taking a measurement with a tape measure to obtain the diameter of the lesion. In addition, they were asked for consent to take a photograph with a professional camera to document the injury to show only the area of the body with the injury without unnecessarily observing areas. It was explained to them that this scale is only to directly assess the injury to the patient, without taking blood or tissue samples, or psychological or invasive tests.
The results were emptied into an Excel table and then analyzed by SPSS version 24. The scores were then compared to assess intraobserver reliability for the final result, as well as for each item. Intra- and interrater reliability was calculated for qualitative observations using the Cohen’s kappa The statistical evaluator was blinded. The interpretation of concordance values was adapted as follows: k less than 0.20, poor agreement; k of 0.21–0.40, fair agreement; k of 0.41–0.60, moderate agreement; k of 0.61–0.80, good agreement; and k of 0.81–1.00, very good agreement.
Two observers scaled a total of 20 patients. The mean age was 16.45 months with a standard deviation of ± 12.75 months. Sixteen female and four male patients were included, a percentage of 80 and 20%, respectively (Table 1). 45% of the patients have facial injuries and 55% presented injuries that were classified as extra-facial.
For the evaluation, a kappa coefficient was performed for each item on the scale, a general index was obtained with the 20 patients of 0.714 and for the evaluations of the specific items for facial and extra-facial injuries, a kappa index of 0.654 was obtained and 0.621 respectively. The following items obtained a 0.799 for the location, a 1.0 for the risk of structural anomalies, 0.516 for complications, 0.298 for the item of pain and in the general risk and probability of deformation, a kappa index of 0.670 was obtained, and specifically in this item the breakdown of facial and extra facial was also made, obtaining indices of 0.690 and 0.515 respectively (Table 2).
The average score for each examiner was obtained, with examiner 1 obtaining a mean of 7 and examiner 2 of 6, without statistically significant differences between each examiner (Table 2). In 7 patients the difference was greater than 2 points between the total results obtained by the examiners.
The validation of scales in local language is extremely important due to cultural changes and the adaptation of words, especially from English to Spanish.
In our work, a satisfactory kappa correlation index was observed in most of the items evaluated and perfect in the item of risk of associated structural anomalies, this due to the exact description used in the response items of this item. The item of complications present at the time of the evaluation obtained a moderate agreement, this is probably due to the wide variety of responses.
In the study where this scale was evaluated, there is a wide inter-observer variability of complications, with percentages of agreement that could go from 100% to 62% (1). Lastly, the item where pain is evaluated was the one with the most inter-observer variability, this can be explained by the little explanation of these items on the scale, especially with the subsection “none” and “mild intermittent pain that does not require systemic medication" This could be confusing for the scale applicators due to the variability in the ages of the patients evaluated.
In our study, the minimum age studied was 4 months and the maximum was 48 months. In these cases the evaluation of pain is different and erroneous evaluation can be carried out especially with examiners with less clinical experience. No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the total scores obtained between each examiner, which tells us of a homogeneity of the results.
The weaknesses of our study is the lack of the intraobserver pilot test to be used in pediatric residents, as well as the strengths of our study is that it is the first study to be validated in the Mexican population.
The application of the Hemangiomas Severity Scale in pediatric patients in our population is a useful and reproducible tool with great clinical applicability, since the evaluation is simple and does not require further extension of the time of a regular consultation in this type of patient.
The revision of the pain assessment is suggested for a better agreement of the results obtained between the examiners in order to obtain more homogeneous results.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
