AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/285
1 Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George's, University of London, and St. George's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
2 Department of Cardiology, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
3 Royal Holloway, University of London.
*Corresponding Author: Riyaz A. Kaba, Cardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, St. George's, University of London, and St. George's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Citation: Jochanan E. Naschitz (2022). ECG at the Bedside: Atrial Bigeminy with Alternating long and Short PR Interval. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 5(10); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/285
Copyright: © 2022 Jochanan E. Naschitz, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 14 November 2022 | Accepted: 29 November 2022 | Published: 06 December 2022
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; hybrid ablation; elderly; convergent ablation
The most common age range for atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence over the coming decades will potentially be in those over 75 years old. However, despite widespread recognition of the strong association between AF burden and age, the elderly are under-represented within trials evaluating invasive rhythm control strategies. We report the outcomes of a gentleman in his late eighties that underwent Convergent hybrid ablation for highly symptomatic and longstanding persistent AF. Now four years later and into his nineties, he remains in sinus rhythm and enjoys good cardiac health without the need for anti-arrhythmic drugs or further intervention. To our knowledge, this case report is the oldest patient to have successfully undergone Convergent ablation with enduring sinus rhythm with long-term follow-up, despite significant risk factors for AF recurrence. As the overall population ages, the emergence of this minimally invasive multidisciplinary ablation technique for AF may offer to similar patients benefits over percutaneous ablation strategies alone.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and is estimated to affect between 2-4%% of adults [1]. Prevalence continues to increase despite improvements in care, primarily due to the steadily ageing population and the rising burden of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. With the currently shifting United Kingdom (UK) age demographic, the number of patients with AF is expected to increase from 700,000 in 2010 to 1.8 million by 2060 [2].
In AF, regular atrial electrical activity is lost and replaced by a more chaotic and unpredictable rhythm that leads to ineffective atrial contraction and loss of atrioventricular electromechanical synchrony. As a result, AF is a significant risk factor for heart failure, stroke, dementia, and premature death [3]. Restoration of usual sinus rhythm is possible and most effectively achieved in the long term with catheter ablation, which is routinely offered to symptomatic patients [4]. However, older patients, particularly those with longstanding persistent AF, have been under represented within interventional ablation trials. Hence, in common with other strategies such as angiography [5], it is less often utilised in these cohorts.
Most recently, Convergent hybrid AF ablation has emerged as a minimally invasive technique that may offer selected patients benefits over percutaneous ablation alone [6]. As a strategy, the procedure benefits from the involvement of cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiac surgeons, and associated specialist teams that aim to ablate more effectively AF triggers and substrate(s) that may be responsible. However, the efficacy and safety of Convergent hybrid ablation in the elderly remains unclear.
An active and independent male in his late eighties developed persistent AF. After three years of longstanding persistent AF, including an unsuccessful attempt at electrical cardioversion, he was referred to an electrophysiologist for consideration of ablation therapy. His past medical history included well-controlled hypertension and coeliac disease. Clinical history revealed exertional dyspnoea, palpitations, and fatigue. Notably, there was a significant reduction in his exercise tolerance, and he could not continue regular exercise at the gym, something he had previously enjoyed for many years. Echocardiography demonstrated severe left atrial (LA) dilatation (5.0 cm), good biventricular function, and no significant valve disease. Blood tests, including BNP, were unremarkable.
He commenced amiodarone and underwent electrical cardioversion, which failed to restore sinus rhythm for longer than ten days. Furthermore, despite optimal rate control with Bisoprolol, he remained highly symptomatic. Repeat cardioversion was inappropriate considering the previously short-lasting effect under the influence of amiodarone, together with the presence of severely dilated LA and the three-year history of persistent AF. Given these factors, an invasive strategy was indicated, particularly given his previous level of independence and fitness, for which he too was keen to explore this option.
His case was discussed at our Arrhythmia multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. Whilst endocardial ablation has a class one indication after the failure of anti-arrhythmic drug therapy [1], our patient had significant risk factors for AF recurrence, as reported above. Hence, there was a high probability that multiple procedures would be required over the next few
years, which he would be less likely to tolerate with advancing age. After extensive discussion, the collective opinion was that he could benefit from minimally invasive Convergent hybrid ablation. The Convergent technique was preferred since it is currently the least invasive of all the hybrid techniques, requiring short recovery times and is well tolerated. The advantages, limitations, and risks of all treatments were discussed, and the patient elected to proceed with the MDT recommendation.
Convergent hybrid ablation is a multidisciplinary, two-stage procedure aiming to provide complete endo-epicardial isolation of the pulmonary veins and the left atrial posterior wall. Stages are performed sequentially, either on the same day or often on separate days, 1-3 months apart. In our patient, stage one involved a minimally invasive epicardial surgical ablation utilising a transdiaphragmatic, posterior pericardioscopic approach. In stage two, adjunctive percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation was performed to enable completion of the transmural lesion sets and target regions that the epicardial approach could not reach, such as the region of the transverse sinus and parts of the anterior and superior aspects of the superior pulmonary veins. Our patient underwent both stages without complications and was discharged the day after each component of the two-staged procedure.
Figure 1: 12-lead ECG, showing long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm following Convergent hybrid ablation.
Figure 2: Antero-posterior fluoroscopic view of the ablation catheter in the posterior pericardial space.
Successful and enduring rhythm control of longstanding persistent AF remains challenging in those with advanced age. Patients over the age of 75 account for one-third of all AF patients [7] and will account for the most significant growth in AF prevalence in the coming decades [8]. Despite this, they are heavily under-represented in interventional and surgical studies. Consequently, conservative approaches (with rate-control medications) remain the most utilised management strategies for elderly patients with persistent AF [7]. This may be related to conventionally low success rates following catheter ablation therapy in persistent and longstanding persistent AF, with rates as low as 43% at 25 months [9]. In addition, maintaining sinus rhythm following ablation is even more challenging in patients with a dilated LA [10]. As both adverse factors were present in our elderly patient, longstanding persistent AF for three years and a severely dilated LA, the anticipated success from endocardial catheter ablation was expected to be particularly low. Hence, such an approach would likely necessitate multiple attempts to achieve long-lasting sinus rhythm, if at all. For patients with advanced age, the need for repeat procedures over several years presents a unique challenge. An alternative therapy could have been an 'ablate and pace' strategy. However, our patient had very well rate-controlled persistent AF, so restoring atrioventricular synchrony in sinus rhythm was a more critical factor [11].
Considering all the factors discussed above, we elected to perform an emerging hybrid technique in AF ablation, the Convergent procedure, which substantially enhances outcomes in patients with longstanding persistent AF [12]. The procedure involves minimally invasive surgical epicardial ablation, followed by percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation, aiming to produce transmural lesions and improve long-term efficacy. Furthermore, it is essential to undertake both components of the Convergent hybrid ablation since there is a significant recovery of electrical activity following the surgical epicardial ablation alone [13].
Elderly patients with AF are less likely to be referred for specialist cardiology opinion and are less likely to be offered treatments to restore normal sinus rhythm [14]. Our case highlights 1) the merit of involving specialists in arrhythmia services, caring for elderly patients with symptomatic and debilitating persistent AF and 2) to consider the minimally invasive Convergent hybrid ablation therapy much earlier in the management pathway for those of advanced age. Indeed, for patients with severely dilated atria and longstanding persistent AF over the age of 75. There is a solid case to be made undertake Convergent hybrid ablation as a first-line therapy to optimise their outcomes and minimise the possibility of multiple catheter ablations over the ensuing years, as during this time, the patient may become less tolerant of repeat invasive procedures. To the best of our knowledge, our patient is the oldest patient reported to have undergone successful Convergent hybrid AF ablation therapy for personally having multiple risk factors for early recurrence at such long-term follow-up. Many other patients of advanced age may similarly benefit from this emerging form of minimally invasive ablation therapy.
AF is the commonest cardiac dysrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with loss of coordinated atrioventricular electrical and functional activity. Despite increased prevalence and incidence, elderly patients with AF are less likely to be referred for a cardiologist’s opinion, less well-represented in intervention AF ablation trials, and less likely to be offered an invasive treatment to restore normal sinus rhythm.
In persistent AF, particularly longstanding persistent AF, outcomes from percutaneous strategies are guarded, and patients often require multiple procedures over time. This presents a challenge to the elderly, who may be less well able to tolerate repeat procedures over several years. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical and hybrid strategies for AF ablation, such as Convergent hybrid ablation, may offer similar patients’ unique benefits over percutaneous ablation alone.
Riyaz A. Kaba and Aziz Momin conduct educational sessions for AtriCure (Atricure, West Chester, OH).
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
