AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2637-8892/031
Department of Psychotherapy, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Ricardo Eliécer Neftalí Reyes.Department of Psychotherapy, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, USA.
Citation: Ricardo Eliécer Neftalí Reyes, LINAC treating more patients having brain arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery technique. J. Psychology and Mental Health Care. 2(3); DOI: 10.31579/2637-8892/031
Copyright: © Ricardo Eliécer Neftalí Reyes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 April 2018 | Accepted: 26 May 2018 | Published: 11 June 2018
Keywords: linear accelerator, stereotactic radiosurgery, brain arteriovenous malformations, embolization
Background: Linear accelerator (LINAC) based radiosurgery for a brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) is replacing gamma knife radiosurgery. We present clinical outcome, obliteration rates and predictor factors of treatment success following LINAC radiosurgery for bAVM which is not much addressed subject in Middle East.
Methods: 13 patients who underwent LINAC radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations from November 2008 to November 2011 in our radiation oncology department were retrospectively analyzed. Recollection of demographic data, AVM and treatment characteristics along with clinical and radiographic follow up information was done by reviewing the electronic data base.
Results: All thirteen patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery by linear accelerator based treatment delivery system (BrainLab) over three years. These included 7 males and 6 females, with median age of 22 years. Intracranial hemorrhage was a presenting feature in 7 (54 %) of patients. Prior embolization was done in 10 (77%) patients with 7 patients having more than once undergone this procedure. The location of AVM was superficial in 9 (70%) and deep in brain in 4 (30%) patients. The mean AVM score was 0.97 with 3 patients having AVM score ≥ 1 with mean Spetzler-Martin grade of 2.7 and 8 (62%) patients having grade 3 or more. Median follow up was 30 months. Mean dose delivered was 21.7 Gy in single fraction. Complete obliteration of AVM nidus was achieved in 9 (70%) patients while 4 patients (30%) had partial obliteration. Six patients (67 %) achieved complete obliteration among 9 who had AVM score of less than 1. Post radiosurgery neurological deficit occurred in only one patient in form of right temporal field loss.
Conclusions: Linear accelerator based radiosurgery is promising treatment option for brain AVMs in majority of cases with reasonable adverse effect profile.
Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between the arteries and veins, with poorly formed blood vessels that shunt blood directly from the arterial circulation to the venous system bypassing the capillary network. The high pressures and flow rates in AVM vessels combined with poor construction of the abnormal shunting vessel walls make them vulnerable to rupture and intracranial hemorrhage [1]. Brain AVMs are congenital, but symptoms usually do not appear until the second decade of life. They commonly present with brain hemorrhage, but neurological deficits, seizures and headaches may also occur. The gold standard for diagnosing AVM was conventional angiography in the recent past. However, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography are now the first-line diagnostic tools for AVMs [2].
AVMs can occur in the entire central nervous system with a predilection of the supratentorial intracranial compartment. Observation, endovascular embolization, surgical excision and radiosurgery are the main options for management. Based on the characteristics of the lesion, each of these can be used individually or combined as multimodal therapy [3].Microsurgical resection of a cerebral AVM allows for an immediate therapeutic cure whereas stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides an alternative for inoperable or high-risk lesions that require treatment [4]. Radiosurgery is thought to reduce the risk of hemorrhage in AVMs over the course of 2 to 3 years by obliterating the nidus of abnormal vasculature. Depending on the lesion volume, dose of radiation and the pattern of vascular supply and drainage, success in treating AVMs is variable [5].
The role of radiosurgery as a treatment for arteriovenous malformations is particularly aimed at reducing intracranial bleeding due to rupture. Predictive factors for radiosurgery's good results and tolerance include size of nidus, anatomical localization of AVM, prior bleeding or embolization and distributed dose distribution [6]. Although most studies present results of gamma-knife treatment dealing with radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations, linear accelerated based radiosurgery is becoming increasingly popular. Much uncertainty still exists about the rationale of combined endovascular and radiosurgical treatment [7]. Stereotactic radiosurgery uses a single fraction high dose radiation while stereotactic radiotherapy uses multifractionated lower dose focused radiation. Our lessons from LINAC precision radiation therapy uphold its value as a promising and effective tool in treating a range of nervous system pathologies [8].
The purpose of this study is to describe our experience in the use of linear accelerator based radiosurgery (RS) for patients with brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in our institute.
This retrospective analysis was performed for all patients with brain AVMs treated with SRS in our department. Between November 2008 and December 2011, a total of 13 patients underwent this procedure. All charts were reviewed for collection of demographic data and treatment characteristics. Pretreatment evaluation consisted of complete history and physical including neurological examination, MRI / MRA scan of brain, Angiogram of cerebral vasculature, Complete blood count, Liver function tests and renal profile.
Initial assessment was done for suitability for SRS in relation to location of the nidus, size of the nidus, arterial supply, and medical suitability for DSA. All cases were evaluated by neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, and radiation oncologists prior to treatment. Patients selected for SRS had AVMs of <3>
The final plan had to be executed after being finally reviewed and approved by primary radiation oncologist (Figure 1and 3). After radiation dose delivery, stereotactic frame was to be removed and patient to be discharged home on analgesics (as needed).
Stereotactic frame was fixed, and DSA was performed in all 13 patients of AVM planned for SRS. Mean age was 22 years (range 17 - 50 years); these included 7 males and 6 females. Intracranial hemorrhage as shown on CT scan brain was a presenting feature in 7 (54 %) of patients. 3 (23%) patients presented with epilepsy. Prior embolization using Onyx was done in 10 (77%) patients with large AVMs and of whom 7 patients having more than once undergone this procedure. The location of AVM was superficial in 9 (70%) and deep in brain in 4 (30%) patients. The mean AVM score was 0.97 with 3 patients having AVM score ≥ 1 with mean Spetzler-Martin grade of 2.7 and 8 (62%) patients having grade 3 or more. (AVM score= (0.1 Χ AVM volume in ml + 0.02 Χ age in years + 0.3 Χ AVM location); AVM location: 0 = frontal/temporal; 1 = parietal/occipital/intraventricular/ cerebellar/ callosal; 2 = basal ganglia / thalamus / brain stem). Median follow up was 30 months. Mean dose delivered was 21.7 Gy in single fraction. Complete obliteration of AVM nidus was achieved in 9 (70%) patients while 4 patients (30%) had partial obliteration. Six patients (67 %) achieved complete obliteration among 9 who had AVM score of less than 1. Post radiosurgery neurological deficit occurred in only one patient in form of right temporal field loss. The mean number of beams used was 9 (range 7-12). The mean nidus volume was 2.32 cc (range 0.7 - 4 cc). The mean prescribed maximum dose was 21.7 Gy (SD 1.95, range 15-22 Gy).Mean dose to brain stem, optic chiasm and optic nerves was 3.40Gy (range 0.11 – 12.2Gy), 0.55 Gy (range 0.04 – 2.66), and 0.41 Gy (range 0.01-2.66 Gy), respectively. There was no dose attenuation effect by prior Onyx embolization after radiosurgery. No other patients had symptomatic permanent sequelae related to SRS. All patients are leading an active and functional life. Patients and treatment characteristics are summarized in (Table 1).
Variables | N (%) |
Age at presentation | 22 yrs (Range: 17-50) |
Gender |
|
Male | 7 (54%) |
Female | 6 (46%) |
Hemorrhage at presentation |
|
Yes | 7 (54%) |
No | 6 (46%) |
Seizures at Presentation |
|
Yes | 3 (23%) |
No | 10 (77%) |
Times Embolization done |
|
None | 3 (23%) |
Once | 3 (23%) |
Twice | 4 (30%) |
Thrice | 3 (23%) |
Type of imaging done for assessment |
|
Angiogram alone | 3 (23%) |
MRA & Angiogram | 10 (77%) |
Site of AVM |
|
Frontoparietal | 4 (30%) |
Thalamic | 2 (15.4%) |
Temporal | 2 (15.4%) |
Occipital | 1 (7.7%) |
Basal ganglia | 1 (7.7%) |
Corpus callosum | 2 (15.4%) |
Vermian | 1 (7.7%) |
Location of AVM |
|
Superficial | 9 (70%) |
Deep | 4 (30%) |
Mean Spetzler-Martin grade |
|
I | 0 |
II | 5 (38.5%) |
III | 8 (61.5%) |
Treatment Characteristics |
|
No. of beams for SRS | 9 (Range: 7-12) |
Nidus volume | 2.32 cc (Range: 0.7-4) |
Prescribed Dose | 21.7 Gy (Range: 15-22) |
Follow up | 30 months (Range: 13-63) |
Obliteration rate | 9 (70%) |
Complete Partial | 4 (30%) |
Abbreviations:
AVM= Arteriovenous malformations,
cc= cubic centimeters,
Gy= Gray,
SRS= Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
Table 1 : Patients and treatment characteristics.
Cerebral AVMs are developmental malformations of the intracranial arteriovenous system. Usually they are asymptomatic but when symptomatic present mainly with headache and seizures. Because of their fragile walls and tendency for rupture, the major complication is bleeding. The annual rate of hemorrhage from AVMs is 2-4% while the lifetime risk is about 40%. There is a higher risk of subsequent bleeding up to 6
SRS is a viable and safe option in the management of small AVMs. Stringent case selection provides acceptable obliteration rates with minimal long-term toxicity. This study provides a platform for treating more patients having brain arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery technique. The choice of patients is critical depending mainly upon size of AVM and its location within the cranium. Obviously there is a need for collection of large database to fully explore the other prognostic and risk factors.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
