AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
opinion article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8949/124
Professor of Advanced Medicine, CellSonic Limited, RAK, UAE.
*Corresponding Author: Andrew Hague, Professor of Advanced Medicine, CellSonic Limited, RAK, UAE.
Citation: Andrew Hague, (2023), Lies, Corruption, Death and Addiction©, Dermatology and Dermatitis, 8(2); DOI:10.31579/2578-8949/124
Copyright: © 2023, Andrew Hague. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons. Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 08 March 2023 | Accepted: 18 March 2023 | Published: 26 May 2023
Keywords: : percutaneous coronary artery intervention; aortic dissection; stent; surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass
Decisions depend on truths which can be dubious. Deliberate lies manipulate. Addiction is decision avoidance. The medical industry is corrupt at the highest levels causing more deaths than wars. Chronic disease exists because cures are prohibited. Unethical decisions have been legitimised.
This article explains the problems and identifies the solutions.
Imagination is the curse of humans. Its only purpose is to rectify changes. We have gone from throwing stones to dropping nuclear bombs. Everyone wants a better weapon. With inventions satisfying that request, there is no end, only more disaster. Ask any artist, for it is they who exemplify imagination and they will tell you that total change is not acceptable, only a bit at a time.
Then why do we have imagination? It may have happened during our evolution when the brain lost its communicative powers leaving it needing language because intuitive powers were lost. Lateral thinking aided survival in times of competition for food and shelter. Combined with a ruthless approach, humans forced their will on other humans and creatures. The skill of imagination has become praised. Its scope for damage is unrecognised and warnings must be raised.
To manage our roles in society we must frequently make decisions. This is a strenuous mental procedure based on assessing facts and choosing the preferred option. And that is the problem. Is what is presented as a fact true or is it fiction created by some imaginative person?
A new born baby does not decide to suckle a breast. Its instinct is to get milk and for a year, ideally two years, it will drink mother’s milk as its brain forms and grows. During that time the food going in results in poo coming out and the baby fills it nappy naturally. At some stage, with the brain development allowing more thoughts, the baby will consider that there may be an alternative to having a sticky, uncomfortable bottom and yell to use a potty instead. At the same time, mother has anticipated this next stage and begun potty training. She is assisted by her mother and the important role of the grandmother explains the menopause.
There is a branch of psychology that believes that all personality traits can only be understood by studying a person’s potty training. Was it so strict that they were forever committed to rules and fearful of breaking them or was it lax allowing the baby to use the potty or not and let someone else clear up the mess. Either way, these extremes in an adult become dysfunctional.
Potty training is where decision making begins. There has to be control. Baby must sense a choice between poo or not poo and hold it until they are sitting on the potty. These two elements, control and choice, are fundamental. Without that experience, deciding does not happen and later in life they encounter the consequences.
Another factor in the process is trust. The provider of the option is also the provider of milk and their integrity is never questioned. What mother offers is the rule. Disobey and punishment is deserved. Crying does not help. Thus forms a trust in what is offered.
This is where the problem of truth starts. If what is offered comes from a trusted source it is accepted but if that source has been conned, all the recipients down the line are also conned. Some imagination used to distort and spread lies can be disseminated as truth resulting in chaos.
Questioning all offers is strenuous. To avoid the effort, most people follow each other believing that if everyone does it, it must be right. This is fashion, be not too different. This year the colour is blue. Wear blue and you are accepted. Being accepted is being loved and secure in a group. Wear yellow when blue is in and expect to be excluded. Most people take the option without thinking about a decision. Their control function is little used. Control comes from the mind and is a thought that if left idle withers like an unused muscle. Although a part of the brain will handle the decision-making process, the withering is not a brain fault just as in a computer that stops recognising capital letters, it does not have a hardware problem, it is a software problem. The difference between computer software and the human mind is that the mind has to be active to perform. A programme written for a computer can sit almost forever as an instruction on the tape, disc or chip and when called upon will respond. The mind is different and does not respond to something that has become idle.
We now have two problems: lies and a withering brain.
Lies can be made credible by mass publicity combined with government power reinforcing the order. Drive on the left-hand side of the road. That was the rule in the British Empire and Sweden but not elsewhere. Sweden decided to change the rule to have driving on the right the same as its neighbours. The entire population was informed long in advance and when the time came on the night of Dagen H, Sunday, 3 September 1967 the whole country was awake, sitting in their stationary cars and as the time clicked past midnight, they all moved to the other side of the road. There was control and trust with everyone following everyone else and no accidents, at least not that day. They came later when habit and forgetfulness resulted in head on collisions.
There is great trust in governments, especially those democratically elected. The politicians are seldom experts in all matters and depend on advisors. For medical science, they consult doctors who they trust have studied the options and want to make people healthy and alleviate suffering. Unfortunately, that kind process was corrupted by Rockefeller, Carnegie and others in the 1910s who having found a way to monopolise oil went on to monopolise medicine and lobbied the politicians to only allow medicines from laboratories. This is how the power of pharmaceuticals began and still dominates today. Even the directors of pharmaceutical companies believe in their self-righteousness. The same with universities where the professors taught by other professors according to the rules of pharmaceuticals, that the body is a chemical creature, know only about killing infection with anti-biotics and vaccines and enabling surgery with anaesthetics.
The fact that all life responds to electricity is unknown in medical schools and ridiculed by many doctors. Cancer is an electrical fault as proven in Sweden by Professor Nordenström at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Despite the country being democratic and their people trusting the government, Professor Nordenström’s findings were suppressed by his government. When he took his knowledge to the USA, he got nowhere and died rejected. The truth was suppressed by the medical establishment dominated by pharmaceutical laboratories. Millions of people continued to die and Big Pharma profited by billions of dollars. Modern professors have to bring in money which they do by conducting research to satisfy the wishes of the pharmaceutical sponsors. No research is independent.
They are dealing with biochemistry which has it uses and are steadfastly denying the existence of biophysics. A lie has been established and the population following the herd lacks the knowledge to form the question to extract the truth. In most matters, lay people would let journalists do the questioning for them but when it comes to health the investigative enquirers are as stupid as the rest and cannot think for themselves. Journalists respond to the advertisers on their channels.
Infections can be cured by killing germs with anti-biotics or vaccines. Although these are now mass produced in laboratories, they can be replaced by natural medicines with fewer side effects. All pharmaceuticals have side effects, often devastating. With many based on chemicals extracted from plants and sea creatures, it should be questioned why laboratories are granted legal dominance. Chronic disease is said the be incurable so it will drag on and on and be chronic. To the pharmaceutical industry, this is a rich market where they can sell repeatedly by failing to cure. A cure would be a lost customer. Many drugs are offered which fail to cure and the prescribing doctors say they are needed to make life manageable and without them death will follow. Often that is a lie and in many cases the disease is not caused by an infection but low cell voltage. This is biophysics and failing to recognise these facts is a serious fault in modern medicine. The journalists are as corrupt in their stupid ignorance as the politicians who make the laws to protect the laboratories, not the patients.
The main chronic diseases are cancer, diabetes, arthritis and persistent pain. All of these are now being healed in private clinics using CellSonic machines. Cancer success was proven in 2016 and diabetes about the same time. Joint pain and arthritis was done at least twenty years ago and despite this there are now directors of companies that made addictive, opioid pain-removing drugs in prison for causing harm and defrauding patients. Addiction is good business for the suppliers of the substance. Their customers are captives.
Another failing of humans is a desire to become mentally incapable with alcohol or narcotics. That they capture the person into addiction with no escape is well known. Addiction means there has been no decision. The person is sucked in beyond their will despite knowing what they are doing. Why do they do it and can they change their behaviour?
Look back at the decision-making process that began on the potty. Making a decision is an effort. When the rewards are more than the effort, control is made. To not fill the nappy avoids discomfort and the reward is praise from mother for filling the potty. Most of us benefited from that process. A few years later, with self-awareness playing a role, following the herd is the easy way to make a decision by avoiding making choices and copying everyone else. Their control function lapses. These people desire immediate gratification. At some stage, they discovered pleasant feelings and paid no attention to the consequences. Poo on the floor and let someone else clear up the mess. Getting drunk is fun when everyone else is drunk. Place a big bet and let everyone else see how big you are. If you lose, it was the fault of the slow running horse. Paying for alcohol or narcotics takes all the money as does gambling leaving no other way except robbery. Thieves are sent to prison where they get no help to correct their mental failure. Very few prisoners will benefit from prison whatever the cause of their incarceration but that does not concern the politicians. That’s what prison is, out of sight, out of mind.
Addicts lack the control function. Mentally they are less than two years old. All other functions may be working and that is what makes them difficult patients. They have to accept that they are patients. If they deny their problem, it will get worse until more of their life crumbles. How to install a missing piece of mental software into a two-year-old adult is tricky. We know what has to be done and the imaginative inventors have provided tools. We know that reward is more powerful than punishment. Pavlov’s dog learned to salivate in anticipation of the food it enjoyed. The baby used the potty to please mother and gain her praise. It has to be the same for the adult addict.
Assume they have a smartphone with an app that senses behaviour. Smart watches measure the number of steps walked. Something has to sense when transgression occurs, a bet being placed, a woman being stalked, a bottle of whisky being opened. Already there are cameras in a car detecting a driver becoming drowsy. These details can be worked out with the many digital tools available. Send a message to the loved ones, “I did not take a drink and resisted temptation”. The participating family and friends have to be supportive. Their side of the same app replies, “Well done Joe. We love you.” An addict cannot be cured alone. Others must act in support of the treatment.
When temptation looks like winning, the addict gets a nudge or stronger. There are collars for barking dogs. When it barks, they hear a sound or maybe it stings them. The dog learns not to bark and remains silent. The addict has to wear a punishing sensor.
The manipulation is weighted to rewards which will mostly be support from others and adding to a score resulting in another month free with messages. Backing this up are painful tweaks making immediate gratification immediately dislikable.
A CellSonic treatment to the spine sends neurons into the brain and has become standard for all patients because all healing starts in the brain. The addicts will also benefit from twice weekly surges of neurons. No drugs are used and there are no side effects. The capability of the spine treatment is understood with the healing of severed spinal cord, the ultimate orthopaedic repair. No surgery needed.
Decision making has to be based on the truth, not some illusion imagined by a despot intent on profiteering and exploitation. The medical industry is corrupt at the highest level extending to law makers controlling regulators and media moguls extracting advertising revenue. The list includes alcohol makers, drug pushers who are governmental and mafia and gambling rackets along with doctors and hospitals promising pharmaceutical based treatments. All have to be questioned on the truth, their lack of ethics and taxed to pay for healing their victims. Millions of patients have died unnecessarily from chronic disease because conventional doctors stupidly think they know everything when they only know about pharmaceuticals which are useless on chronic disease. Ask any doctor recommending chemotherapy whether they would inject themselves with the drug and their refusal admits the truth. It is banned in warfare where it is called mustard gas and bought by doctors at high cost. Half the profits of Big Pharma come from chemotherapy. They do not want a cure for cancer.
How Rockefeller Founded Modern Medicine and Killed Natural Cures by Chris Kanthan
How Rockefeller Founded Modern Medicine and Killed Natural Cures - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
How the Global Takeover Mirrors the Hijacking of Medicine by Dr. Joseph Mercola
How the Global Takeover Mirrors the Hijacking of Medicine - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
John Rockefeller: How he took control over Modern Medicine - Herland Report (hannenabintuherland.com)
How Rockefeller Created the Business of Western Medicine – Acupuncture & Dry Needling, Santa Monica, CA (meridianhealthclinic.com)
Western Medicine is Rockefeller Medicine – All the Way (thefreedomarticles.com)
CellSonic Medical (cellsonic-medical.com) with video about Nordenström
CellSonic Medical (cellsonic-medical.com) see downloads at the bottom of the page and more downloads in all the applications pages
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
