AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-5194/017
*Corresponding Author: Alshymaa A. Hassnine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Department of Tropical medicine, Faculty of Medicine - Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Citation: Amr M. Elsayed, Elham Ahmed, Magdy Fouad, Alshymaa A. Hassnine (2021) In Corona Days; Performance Hardships for Suggested Endoscopist Location during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J. Gastroenterology Pancreatology and Hepatobilary Disorders. 5(1): DOI: 10.31579/2641-5194/017
Copyright: © 2021, Alshymaa A. Hassnine, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 January 2021 | Accepted: 01 February 2021 | Published: 23 February 2021
Keywords: COVID-19; EGD; UGI endoscopy; SARS COV2; PPE; China; EGD
Background and Aims: Corona virus disease COVID 2019 is considered as serious pandemic. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an aerosol generating process and may precipitate its transmission. The aim of this study is to assess new location for the endoscopist and supporting team during this era of COVID19.
Methods: This study included 43 patients. Patients were classified into two groups, group 1 included 21 patients in which classic position of endoscopic staff members was done, maintaining the personal protective equipment and the group 2 included 22 patients in which the endoscopist and staff members stand behind the patient.
Results: There is no significant statistical difference between groups regarding the time needed for completing the endoscopic process, the success of the maneuver or the satisfaction of the patient about the maneuvers (P = 0.839, P = 1, P = 0.721) respectively, the endoscopist has to do additional movements by his shoulders or his wrists in group II more significantly than in group I (p=0.012)
Conclusions: Standing of the endoscopist behind the patient while performing EGD is as effective as the standard classic one. In simple upper gastrointestinal UGI endoscopic maneuvers, it may be more protective for endoscopic staff members in the era of pandemic COVID19.
A new coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS COV2) outbreak leading to corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has begun in Wuhan in December 2019, which has rapidly spread throughout China and beyond [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as pandemic on 11 March 2020, and the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases had increased to more than 372000 globally by 24 March 2020 [2].
Guan WJ et el., 2020 studied 1099 patients with COVID-19 from Wuhan and showed that typical clinical symptoms of COVID-19 included cough sore throat, fever, fatigue, and shortness of breath. More than 40% of patients had a history of contact with confirmed COVID cases and 56.2% had no fever [3]. Gastrointestinal symptoms aren’t uncommon but seem to be less common when compared with severe acute respiratory syndrome or Middle East respiratory syndrome [4]. Early studies from Wuhan reported that about 10% of cases presented with nausea and diarrhea few days just before the onset of fever and respiratory symptoms [5]. So, if only respiratory symptoms alone are screened, many cases with COVID-19 may be missed [6]. The overall mortality was about 1.4%, and the mortality increases with the severity of cases up to 22.4% in advanced cases [3, 7].
COVID-19 is mainly spread via droplets and close contact, but it is clear now that airborne spread is possible during aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). In addition, strong evidence suggests that SARS-CoV2, that causes COVID-19 and known as the 2019 novel coronavirus, can be detected in the feces of patients [8] , leading to the possibility of transmission by feco-oral route [9,10].
Gastrointestinal endoscopies, especially those done through the nasal and oral cavities, EGD, may lead to cough and subsequent emission of droplets and increase the risk of exposure of the medical team, including endoscopists, nurses, and assistants, to aerosol contamination [11]. The risk of viral transmission may increase during a prolonged stay in a closed environment as in endoscopic room [12].
Endoscopy units are faced with great challenges during this pandemic as 3.8% of confirmed cases from China were healthcare personnel (HCP) with reported deaths. [13] Endoscopy is likely a high-risk procedure as pulmonary and gastric secretions, as well as fecal material, may contain large viral loads. Infection control measures must be applied to ensure patient safety, avoid nosocomial outbreaks, protect HCP, and ensure rational use of limited personal protective equipment (PPE)[14].
In this study, we want to assess new location for the endoscopist and supporting team during this era of COVID-19 to stand behind the patient instead of the classic position in the upper GI endoscopic maneuver to decrease the possibility of aerosol exposure during the practice of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
This study was done during the period from 21 march 2020 till 1st june 2020, involved 43 consecutive patients were coming to endoscopy unit of minia university hospital for doing urgent UGI endoscopy either presenting with mild attacks of GI bleeding, ingestion of foreign bodies, dysphagia, follow up of variceal ligation after recent variceal hemorrhage as an urgent 2ry prophylaxis, dyspepsia with alarm signs suggesting GI malignancy. patients with suspected COVID19, patients with massive bleeding, those need upper GIT stenting, or those need EMR, were excluded from the study, all routine diagnostic endoscopies, all surveillance and routine follow up were postponed.
Patients were randomly classified into two groups, the first group included 21 patients in which classic position of endoscopic staff members was done, maintaining the personal protective equipment (PPE) including a face mask; isolation gown with water resistance; eye protection [15] Standard hand hygiene procedures before and after each case should be performed Ethanol (62–71% concentration), 2% glutaraldehyde and 0.1–0.5%sodium hypochlorite are used as disinfectants [16]. The second group included 22 patients in which the endoscopist and staff members stand behind the patient, the endoscopic tower equipment was put in front of the patient and the scope channel was gently twisted over the patient to be handled by the endoscopist. The patient is monitored during the procedure, all patients received midazolam IV, the endoscopic procedure was done by Pentax video scope EG 2990 I and pentax video scope EG2990 K using light source EPK-I 5000.
Table (1) Shows the age of patients in group I (21 in number) in which the endoscopist stands in the classic position in front of the patient is ranging from 24 to 63 years, its mean is 38.7, age of patients in group II (their number is 22) in which the endoscopist stands behind the patient is ranging from 22 to 70 years, its mean is 37.8. As regarding sex, there are 11 females (52.4 %), 10 males (47.6%) in group I, in group II there are 11males (50%), 11 females (50%). No significant deference between group I and group II as regarding age and sex.
Significant level at P value < 0>
Table (2) shows different endoscopic maneuvers done in studied groups; esophageal variceal ligation was done in 13 patients (61.9%) in group I and in 15 ones (68.2%) in group II, gastric varcies injection was done in 3 patients (14.2%) in group I and in 3 patients (13.6%) in group II. Diagnostic endoscopy and biopsy was done in 5 patients (23.9%) in group I, and in 4 patients (18.2%) in group II.
(C) Chi Square test for qualitative data between the two groups
Table (3) shows that the taken time for the endoscopic procedure in group I is ranging from 4 minutes to 8 minutes, its mean is 5.45 minutes and that in group II is ranging from 4 to 9 minutes, average is 5.52, without significant statistical difference. in group I the endoscopist has to do additional movements either by his wrist or his shoulder to facilitate the maneuver in only 3 patients (14.3%) while in group II the endoscopist has to do additional movements by his wrist or his shoulder in 14 cases (63.6%) with significant statistical difference p=0.012. in both groups the endoscopist did the endoscopic maneuver with 100% success. As regard patient satisfaction, 16 patients (76.2%) in group I are satisfied versus 18 patients (81.8%) in group II with no significant statistical difference.
The present study designed to assess the new location of the endoscopist and the accompanying team behind the patient instead of the classic position in which the endoscopist stands in front of the patient in the practice of urgent EGD during the current time of era of pandemic COVID19 with preserving the standard precautions of infection control. This is supposed to do more limitations of the hazards of the generated aerosol resulted from the UGI endoscopy maneuver.
As it known that nearly all endoscopic procedures should be considered aerosol generating procedures (AGPs). Coughing and retching can occur during upper endoscopy, generating aerosols [17]. And so increase the possibility of transmission of COVID19 between the health care workers. We studied 43 patients who consulted for doing urgent EGD; 21 endoscopic maneuvers were done by the classic location of the endoscopic staff team maintaining standard precautions and 22 ones were done by changing the team location with careful monitoring of the patients with maintaining the standard precautions as we said. Most of cases were variceal hemorrhage due to the high prevalence of chronic liver diseases and portal hypertension in Egypt [18]. Other cases needed only screening upper GI endoscopy and may be biopsied if needed.
The time needed for completing the maneuvers in both locations nearly were the same also all maneuvers done using the new position were completed successfully as those done by the classic position 100% success but the endoscopist has to do additional movements using his wrist or shoulder to facilitate the work in about 63% of cases versus only 14% using the classic position.
The new location of the endoscopist has no effect on patient satisfaction by upper GI endoscopic process as no significant difference between the classic or the novel position regarding the patient satisfaction.
We conclude that standing of the endoscopist behind the patient while performing EGD is as effective as the standard classic one, we recommend it during simple UGI endoscopic maneuvers as it may be more protective for endoscopic staff members in the era of pandemic COVID19, for further studies either on larger scale of patients or on other different more complex UGI endoscopic techniques.
Abstract (text).
We would like to thank all the patients, controls who participated in this work. I hope that with this and other studies, we can alleviate their sufferings.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
