AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/170
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Omon A. Emmanuel, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
Citation: Ekundina V.O, Oladele A.A, Omon A Emmanuel, and Aliyu, A, (2023), Immunohistochemical Expression of MSH6 and MSH2 in Colorectal Cancer, Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 7(2); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/170
Copyright: © 2023, Omon, A. Emmanuel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 April 2023 | Accepted: 11 April 2023 | Published: 18 April 2023
Keywords: colorectal cancer; immunohistochemistry; expression; MSH2; MSH6
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the cancer of the colon and rectum, which are situated, in the lower digestive tract. CRC is caused by mutations that target oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and genes related to DNA repair mechanisms. The aim of this study was to observe and study the expression of MSH6 and MSH2 in colorectal cancer and to determine the expression of these markers in normal colorectal sample, colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia and colorectal cancer. A total of 65 formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks comprising 15 normal colorectal tissues, 25 colonic polyps tissues and 25 malignant invasive colorectal cancer were retrieved from the Pathological Archives. Immunohistochemical analysis was carried out on the samples. The immunohistochemical staining was evaluated and the results obtained were considered. Nuclear MSH2 staining was expressed; Normal cases showed a positivity rate of 46%, Colonic polyps’ cases showed a positivity rate of 56%, colorectal carcinoma cases had a positivity rate of 100% as all of the cells showed significant expression. Nuclear MSH6 was expressed; Normal cases showed a positivity rate of 40%, Colonic polyps’ cases showed a positivity rate of 60%, colorectal carcinoma cases had a positivity rate of 100% as all of the cells showed significant expression. There was a distinct upregulation of MSH2 and MSH6. The upregulated expression of MSH2 and MSH6 in normal colorectal tissues, neoplastic colonic polyps and colorectal cancer confirms the usefulness of tumor biomarkers and Immunohistochemistry in predicting progression of malignant lesions.
Cancer of the colon and rectum, which are located in the lower digestive tract, is referred to as colorectal cancer (CRC). Around a million people are affected by adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum every year, and the 5-year mortality rate is close to 50% [1]. As the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death globally, colorectal cancer poses a serious threat to public health [2]. Oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and genes involved in DNA repair pathways are the targets of mutations that lead to CRC. Colorectal cancers can be categorized as sporadic (70%), hereditary (5%) or familial (25%), depending on the source of the mutation. Chromosome instability, microsatellite instability (MSI), and the CpG island methylator phenotype are the pathogenic processes causing this condition [3].
DNA mismatch repair protein the MSH2 gene, which is found on chromosome 2, encodes the protein known as MSH2, often referred to as MutS homolog 2, or MSH2[4]. A DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein, MSH2, is encoded for by the tumor suppressor gene MSH2. MSH2 forms a heterodimer with MSH6 to create the human MutS mismatch repair complex [5]. MSH2 participates in a variety of DNA repair processes, including base excision repair [6], homologous recombination [7], transcription-coupled repair and homologous recombination [8]. Microsatellite instability and various malignancies, including hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, are linked to mutations in the MSH2 gene (HNPCC). This gene has at least 114 known pathogenic mutations [9].
In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the MSH6 gene, also known as mutS homolog 6, codes for the DNA mismatch repair protein MSH6. Whereas hMSH2 mutations strongly influence the phenotype of all mutators, hMSH6 mutations have a much more limited impact. At the gene level, it was discovered that the mutations mainly resulted in single-base substitution mutations, which implies that hMSH6 predominantly functions to repair single-base substitution mutations and, to a lesser extent, single base insertion/deletion mutations [10].
Immunohistochemical markers MSH6 and MSH2 have been demonstrated to be helpful in the diagnosis of colorectal lesions. In order to understand how MSH6 and MSH2 are expressed in colorectal cancer, this study will examine how these markers are expressed in normal colorectal tissue, colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia, and colorectal cancer. The study's results will help in observing the development of benign into malignant lesions of the colon through the process of immunoreactivity and figuring out whether these markers may be employed to express colorectal cancer for potential treatment choices.
One of the most prevalent tumors of the gastrointestinal tract is colorectal cancer (CRC). Almost 10% of all cancers diagnosed each year and cancer-related deaths globally are caused by colorectal cancer [5]. It is the second most frequent cancer among women and the third most frequent among men. Estimates of the heredity of colorectal cancer based on twin and family studies range from 12% to 35%. Immunohistochemical markers MSH6 and MSH2 have been demonstrated to be helpful in the diagnosis of colorectal lesions [9]. The aim of this study is to determine the expression of MSH6 and MSH2 in colorectal cancer.
Tissue Sample Selection
A total of 65 formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks comprising of 15 normal colorectal tissues, 25 colonic polyps tissues and 25 malignant invasive colorectal cancer were retrieved from the Pathological Archives of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex Ile-Ife (OAUTHC).
Immunohistochemical Analysis
The expression of the biomarkers, MSH2 and MSH6, were demonstrated immunohistochemically using the Avidin-biotin immuno-peroxidase method. Sections on adhesive coated glass slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated using different gradients of ethanol. The sections were pretreated in a pressure cooker for antigen retrieval, using antigen retrieval buffer at 950C for 30 minutes, 900C for 10 seconds and 100C for 10 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by immersion in 3% hydrogen peroxidase solution for 5 minutes. Non-specific binding was blocked with the use of blocking buffer (horse non-immune serum) for 15 minutes. 200μl of diluted primary antibody (BioGenex mouse monoclonal primary antibodies) for MSH2 and MSH6 sequentially was added to slides and incubated at room temperature for 80 minutes. The slides were incubated with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse secondary immunoglobulins for 15 minutes at room temperature. They were subsequently incubated with avidin-biotin peroxidase complex. 3,3-diaminobenzidine was used as a chromogen. The sections were counter stained with hematoxylin.
Immuno-staining Assessment
Expression of MSH6 and MSH2 were determined through a semi-quantitative method. The immunoreactivity of these markers was determined by assessing the staining intensity and percentage of stained cells per field. The staining intensity was graded as mild, moderate and severe. The percentages of positive cells were graded as follows:
0.1%- 10% are stained = negative (-), grade 0.
10.1%- 39% are stained= positive (+), grade 1.
40. 0%-79% are stained= positive (++), grade 2.
80.0%-100% are stained = positive (+++), grade 3 (Ekundina et al., 2021).
Analysis
Results were presented in figures and tables; pictures (micrographs) were also used where necessary. MSH2 and MSH6 staining was evaluated using regular light microscope at x100 and x400.
Photomicrography
The Stained sections were examined under a LEICA research microscope (LEICA DM750, Switzerland) interfaced with digital camera (LEICA ICC50). Digital photomicrographs of stained sections for the histomorphology and immunohistochemistry on the organs studied were taken at various magnifications and reported for Morphological changes.
Figure 1 is a pie-chart showing the case distribution with 15 normal cases, 25 colonic polyps cases and 25 colorectal carcinoma cases.
Table 1 showed the semi-quantitative expression of MSH2 in normal, colonic polys and colorectal cancer. Normal cases showed a positivity rate of 46%, Colonic polyps’ cases showed a positivity rate of 56%, colorectal carcinoma cases had a positivity rate of 100% as all of the cells showed significant expression.
Table 2 showed the reaction expression of MSH2 in normal, colonic polyps and colorectal cancer, where in Normal, 8 slides showed no significant reaction and 7 showed slightly significant reaction; Colonic polyps had 11 slides with insignificant reactions and 14 with slight and moderate significant reaction; Colorectal cancer had all twenty-five (25) slides showing varying degrees of significant reaction.
Table 3 showed the semi-quantitative expression of MSH6 in normal, colonic polys and colorectal cancer. Normal cases showed a positivity rate of 40%, Colonic polyps’ cases showed a positivity rate of 60%, colorectal carcinoma cases had a positivity rate of 100% as all of the cells showed significant expression.
Table 4 showed the expression of MSH6 in normal, colonic polyps and colorectal cancer, where in Normal, 9 slides showed no significant reaction and 6 showed slightly significant reaction; Colonic polyps had 10 slides with insignificant reactions and 15 with slight and moderate significant reaction; Colorectal cancer had all twenty-five (25) slides showing varying degrees of significant reaction.
Table 5 showed the mean percentage reactivity of MSH2 and MSH6 in normal, colonic polyps and colorectal carcinoma. It shows an increase in reactivity in MSH2and MSH6 from normal to colorectal carcinoma.
Figure 2 showed the mean percentage reactivity of markers in indicated cases. The results obtained showed a gradual increase in percentage reactivity in MSH2 and MSH6 from normal to colorectal carcinoma.
Figure 3 showed the H&E plates. The results obtained showed general structure stained sections of colorectal carcinoma at x100 and x400 (plate A); colonic polyps at x100 and x400 (plate B); normal at x100 and x400 (plate C). Presence of karyomegaly, Hyperchromasia, increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and koliocytes.
Figure 4 showed the MSH2 Immunohistochemistry Plates. Nuclear MSH2 stained sections of colorectal carcinoma at x100 and x400 (plate A); colonic polyps at x100 and x400 (plate B); normal at x100 and x400 (plate C). Insignificant MSH2 immunohistochemical stains in normal colorectal tissue (plate C), moderate immunohistochemical staining within the nucleus of colonic polyps (plate B) and moderate to severe immunohistochemical staining in colorectal carcinoma (plate A).
Figure 5 showed the MSH6 Immunohistochemistry Plates. Nuclear MSH6 stained sections of colorectal carcinoma at x100 and x400 (plate A); colonic polyps at x100 and x400 (plate B); normal at x100 and x400 (plate C). Insignificant MSH6 immunohistochemical stains in normal colorectal tissue (plate C), moderate immunohistochemical staining within the nucleus of colonic polyps (plate B) and moderate to severe immunohistochemical staining in colorectal carcinoma (plate A).
Figure 1: Pie-chart showing the case distribution with 15 normal cases, 25 colonic polyps cases and 25 colorectal carcinoma cases
Table 1: Expression of MSH2 in indicated cases
Table 2: Reaction expression of MSH2 in indicated cases
Table 3: Semi-quantitative expression of MSH6
Table 4: Reaction expression of MSH6 in indicated cases
Table 5: Mean percentage reactivity of immunohistochemical markers in indicated cases
Figure 2: Mean percentage Reactivity of IHC biomakers
Figure 3: H&E Plates
Figure 4: MSH2 Immunohistochemistry Plates
Figure 5: MSH6 Immunohistochemistry Plates
From this retrospective study, the findings revealed that MSH2 and MSH6 is expressed significantly in colorectal cancer cases with high immunohistochemical expression and degree of reactivity while in the normal colorectal tissue and colonic polyps, weak immunohistochemical staining was observed within the nucleus and classified as negative and mild respectively. The positivity rate of MSH2 among the cases was forty-six (46%) in normal, fifty-six percent (56%) in colonic polyps and one hundred percent (100%) in colorectal carcinoma and the mean percentage reactivity was 43.2%, 56.6% and 90.1% in normal, colonic polyps and colorectal carcinoma respectively, while the positivity rate of MSH6 among the cases was forty percent (40%) in normal, fifty percent (50%) in colonic polyps and one hundred percent (100%) in colorectal carcinoma and the mean percentage reactivity was 40.5%, 56.2% and 92% in normal, colonic polyps and colorectal carcinoma respectively. This expressions is in agreement with Arshita et al. [ 11] which shows that with increase in reactivity the more severe the colorectal case and also confirms that MSH2 protein performs its function by forming a heterodimer complex with MSH6 (MutSα) or with another alternative pair MSH3 (MutSβ). Lack of MSH2 expression can occur due to mutations of MSH2 and EpCAM (epithelial cellular adhesion molecule) genes. Meanwhile, MSH6 can only be expressed when it forms a pair with MSH2 because MSH6 has a special intrinsic ATPase activity for binding to MSH2. In addition, MSH2 mutations also cause weak or unbinding to MSH6 that result in the degradation of MSH6. The negative expression of MSH6 by itself in IHC indicates the MSH6 germline mutation [11].
In order to function, MSH2 protein forms a heterodimer complex with either MSH6 (MutS) or an alternate pair, MSH3 (MutS). Mutations in the MSH2 and EpCAM (epithelial cellular adhesion molecule) genes can result in a lack of MSH2 expression. MSH6 has a unique intrinsic ATPase activity for binding to MSH2, hence it can only be expressed when it forms a pair with MSH2[12]. Moreover, MSH2 mutations result in MSH6 degradation by weakening or impairing its ability to connect to MSH2. The MSH6 germline mutation is shown by the negative expression of MSH6 by itself in IHC [13].
The proximal (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon), distal (descending colon, sigmoid colon) regions and rectum are possible locations for tumors. The distinction between the proximal and distal regions might be challenging in some situations[14]. MSH2 MSI or MSH6 MSI was more common in patients whose tumors were in the colon. Another study revealed that the intestinal area experiences mutations more frequently than the rectum [15]. Moreover MSI-H cases were more frequent (15–20%) in patients with colon cancer than in those with rectal cancer (10%), according to Charara et al. [16]. Furthermore, MSI and hyper-mutation of the MMR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3Ca proteins are more prevalent in the proximal colon. It has been suggested that environmental factors like bacterial toxins or CYP450 metabolites can accelerate the rate of mutation in this area [17].
The World Health Organization suggests a two-tiered system of histological grading, with a low grade for well-differentiated and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (50%-100% gland formation) and a high grade for poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (0%-49% gland formation) [18]. The majority of the individuals in this study had tumors that were well-differentiated. The outcome was consistent with Fleming et al. [19] findings, which demonstrated that almost 70% of CRC patients with adenocarcinoma fall into the group of well-differentiated tumors and have a moderate degree of differentiation. Nonetheless, the poorly differentiated tumor is typically involved in CRC cases with a propensity for MSI-H[20-21]. Although patients with poor tumor differentiation were more likely to have MSH6 MSI (OR>3), our results were consistent with this finding. According to Xiao et al. [21], people with MSI and poor tumor differentiation have higher disease free survival (DFS) than those with MSS and poor tumor differentiation by about 4 years. Lymph node metastasis is less common in MSI patients with poor tumor differentiation than it is in MSS individuals with poor tumor differentiation [21].
The majority of heritability-causing factors are still unknown and under investigation, despite the fact that multiple genome-wide association studies of colorectal cancer have effectively discovered cancer susceptibility genes that are related with colorectal cancer risk. Yet, because these patients have few adenomas and because those adenomas physically resemble random lesions, Lynch syndrome caused by a dysfunction of the DNA mismatch repair system is commonly overlooked. Microsatellite instability (MSI), a condition defined by the increase or contraction of microsatellite areas in the tumor compared with healthy tissue, is the root cause of Lynch syndrome and is identified through molecular analysis. On immunohistochemistry, these tumors exhibit a lack of mismatch repair proteins. Whereas MSI is not unique to Lynch syndrome, it is present in about 15% of sporadic colorectal malignancies [22].
MSH2 showed majorly nuclear staining across the epithelium and MSH6 showed strong nuclear staining in the epithelial cells. MSH2 and MSH6 were up regulated. The two markers showed consistency but due to fact that MSH6 is a subgroup of MSH2 it cannot function without forming heterodimer with MSH2 which makes it less reliable than MSH2. MSH2 also showed prognostic significance and is recommended to be used alongside MSH6 to aid in microsatellite instability detection. This study has established the usefulness of MSH2 and MSH6 immunohistochemical markers in studying the colorectal tissue from normal to colonic polyps and then to colorectal carcinoma.
Source of Funding
This work did not receive any funding from neither Government nor non-governmental agencies.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
