AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Mini Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/104
1 Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Olive-View UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen-UCLA School of Medicine, Sylmar, CA, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Nasser Mikhail, Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Olive-View UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen-UCLA School of Medicine, Sylmar, CA, USA.
Citation: N Mikhail, V Mahabadi. (2021) Effects of COVID-19 on testicular function J. Endo and Dis; 5(1); DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/104
Copyright: © 2021 Nasser Mikhail, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 February 2021 | Accepted: 15 March 2021 | Published: 17 March 2021
Keywords: COVID-19; fertility; male; semen; spermatogenesis; testosterone; orchitis; testes
Background: The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) on testicular function is unclear.
Objective: To clarify the effects of COVID-19 on male gonadal function.
Methods: Pubmed search up to February 24, 2021. Search terms included COVID-19, testicles, testosterone, spermatogenesis, hypogonadism. Case reports, retrospective, prospective and autopsy studies are included.
Results: Prevalence of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 having scrotal pain varies from 0-19%. Orchitis and/or epididymitis were demonstrated by scrotal ultrasound (US) in approximately 22-42% of men with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital and can be frequently asymptomatic. Circulating testosterone levels are reduced in men admitted with COVID-19 with concomitant elevation of luteinizing hormone (LH) suggesting testicular dysfunction. Men affected with COVID-19 exhibit abnormal semen parameters. Most, but not all, studies failed to detect SARS-CoV-2 in semen. Autopsy studies showed extensive damage of testicular tissues of men who died from severe COVID-19.
Conclusion: COVID-19 negatively affects almost all aspects of male gonadal function. Physicians should evaluate testicular function during and after recovery from COVID-19 to preserve normal fertility.
Introduction
Many viruses such as mumps, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Zika virus, and others can invade the testicles [1] SARS-Cov-2 uses angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as receptor and the transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) as co-receptor for host cell binding and penetration [2]. Conflicting data exist regarding expression of these receptors in testicular tissues. Thus, some workers found that ACE2 receptors were expressed in testicular germ cells, Leydig cells, and Sertoli cells [3, 4]. In addition, ACE2 receptors and TMPR22 are expressed in prostate [5]. However, Pan et al [6] found that ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are expressed sparsely in the human testes, whereas Stanley et al [7] failed to detect co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in testicular cells. Nevertheless, emerging data provide convincing evidence that several men affected with COVID-19 exhibit significant gonadal dysfunction. The latter is reflected by frequent presence of scrotal symptoms in COVID-19 patients, and evidence of orchitis and epididymitis by scrotal imaging. In addition, there is impairment of semen parameters in patients examined at various stages of COVD-19. Moreover, autopsy studies demonstrated extensive testicular damage in patients who died from severe COVID-19.
Testicular symptoms in patients with COVID-19
Kim et al [8] described a 42-year-old male who presented with testicular pain for 8 days and was found few days later to have COVID-19 pneumonia. Testicular exam revealed “no abnormal findings” [8]. La Marca et al [9] reported a 43-year-old man who had COVID-19 pneumonia associated with scrotal pain. Scrotal US was consistent with epididymitis [9]. In a cross-sectional study, Pan et al [6] reported that 6 out 34 (19%) men had scrotal discomfort around the time of COVID-19 confirmation. In a prospective study from Turkey of 91 men hospitalized with COVID-19, Ediz et al [10] reported that 11% of men had testicular pain. The latter was not associated with age nor with several inflammatory markers of COVID-19 [10]. On the other hand, in a retrospective study of 253 men, 81% of them had mild COVID-19, the authors did not identify any patients with scrotal complains [11].
Testicular imaging in patients with COVID-19
The first case of testicular inflammation associated with COVID-19 was reported in the pediatric population by Gagliardi et al [12] who reported a 14-year-old boy presenting with scrotal swelling and fever. Scrotal US showed orchitis and epididymitis [12]. Bridwell et al [13] described a 37-year-old man with mild asymptomatic COVID-19 pneumonia presenting with bilateral testicular pain, mild fever, and myalgia approximately 10 days after testing positive with nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (NP-PCR) for COVID-19. Orchitis was confirmed by US without evidence of epididymitis [13].
In a retrospective study from Wuhan, China, Chen et al [14] performed testicular US in 142 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 and median age 58.3 years (range 24-93). They found that 32 of 142 (22.5%) of patients had evidence of acute orchitis (n=10), epididymitis (n=7), or epididymo-orchitis (n=15) [14]. The risk of scrotal infection increased with age and severity of COVID-19. Thus, prevalence reached 53% in men older than 80 years, and acute scrotal infection was more likely to occur in the group with severe COVID-19 compared to the group with non-severe disease, 35.6% and 13.5%, respectively (P=0.002) [14]. Interestingly, only 10 of the 32 (31.3%) patients with abnormal scrotal US exhibited acute scrotal symptoms. Conversely, 3 of the 110 patients (2.7%) who had negative scrotal US had acute scrotal symptoms [14]. These observations suggest that orchitis associated with COVID-19 may be asymptomatic. The latter notion might be also true with respect to epididymitis. In fact, in a small retrospective study from Brazil, Carneiro et al [15] performed testicular US in 26 young men (age range 21-42 years) hospitalized for mild to moderate COVID-19. None of patients had scrotal symptoms [15]. Using similar diagnostic criteria to study of Chen et al [15], they found that 11 patients (42.3%) had US signs of epididymitis, and no patient had signs of orchitis [15]. These findings may have important clinical applications given the important role of the epididymis in male fertility, and certainly require confirmation in larger studies including broader patient population.
Testosterone levels in patients with COVID-19
Testosterone is produced in testicles by Leydig cells and is essential in maintaining normal spermatogenesis and male fertility [16]. There is general agreement that circulating testosterone levels may be reduced in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital [17-19]. Cayan et al [17] have shown that total testosterone levels significantly decreased in a subgroup of 24 Turkish men from 458 ± 198 ng/dl prior to COVID-19 infection to 315 ± 120 ng/dl on the first day of hospital admission (P=0.003). Furthermore, available data suggest that the degree of hypogonadism increases in parallel to the severity of COVID-19. Thus, in one prospective study from Turkey of young patients (mean age ± standard deviation 35.5 ± 9.8 years), Okcelik [18] showed that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had significantly lower testosterone levels than COVID-19 patients without pneumonia, 260.3 and 435.1 ng/dl, respectively (P=0.01). In one Chinese retrospective study, Ma et al [19] compared serum levels of testosterone in 119 young men (age range 20-49 years) hospitalized for COVID-19 (84% of them had moderate disease) with 273 age-matched control subjects. They found a non-significant trend of testosterone levels to be lower in COVID-19 patients compared with control subjects, median [interquartile range, (IQR)] being 397 (314-574) and 464 (351-638) ng/dl, respectively (P=0.18) [19]. Meanwhile, luteinizing hormone (LH) values were significantly higher in patients compared with control individuals; median (IQR) 6.36 (4.63-8.38) and 3.38 (2.48-4.52) mIU/L, respectively, P < 0>
Impairment of spermatogenesis in men with COVID-19
In an Italian prospective study, Gacci et al [21] examined semen parameters in 43 patients who recovered from COVID-19 after 2 consecutive negative nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (median time from the first positive to second consecutive negative test was 31 days, range 3-65 days). They found that 8 patients (18.6%) had azoospermia, and 3 (7.0%) patients had oligospermia (< 2 n=2) n=18) n=14).>
Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the semen
Available data suggest that detection of SARS-CoV-2 in semen is rare. Li et al [25] detected SAR-CoV-2 virus RNA in the semen of 4 out of 15 acutely ill and 2 out of 23 men recovering from COVID-19. Among 43 men who recovered from COVID-19, Gacci et al [21] detected SARS-CoV-2 in semen of only one patient in whom semen sample was collected 21 days after the second negative nasopharyngeal swab. Importantly, his partner did not test positive for SARS-CoV-2 [21]. Meanwhile, 14 studies (n=299), including 2 studies that described men with orchitis-like symptoms, failed to demonstrate SARS-CoV-2 in seminal fluid among patients affected with various stages of COVID-19 [26].
Autopsy studies
Postmortem examination of testicles of patients who died from COVID-19 can shed light on direct impact of severe COVID-19 on gonadal function. Results of the autopsy studies, summarized in table 1, are variable due to differences in patients’ characteristics, timing of death after COVID-19 infection and methodological issues. Most autopsy studies showed severe injury of seminiferous tubules, germ cells, Leydig cells, and variable degrees of apoptosis and interstitial cellular infiltration of inflammatory cells. Two studies showed that Sertoli cells were spared [27, 29]. On the contrary Yang et al [30] described severe injury of Sertoli cells. Interestingly, while viral particles were not identified in most studies, Ma et al [27] have detected viral particles in all testicular autopsies examined (n=5). In a proteomic (i.e protein quantification) autopsy study including samples from 5 patients who died from COVID-19 pneumonia, Nie et al [31] found reduced Leydig cells and sperm motility factor. In addition, there was evidence of reduced testicular biosynthesis of cholesterol, the source of testosterone [31].
Clinical implications
The above results have 2 major implications. First, since orchitis and/or epididymitis, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, are not uncommon among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, it is essential for physicians to elicit history regarding any scrotal complaints [14]. In case of any suspicion of scrotal infection, we recommend performing a scrotal US for further evaluation. If the frequent occurrence of asymptomatic cases of orchitis and/or epididymitis is replicated in future studies, scrotal US should be considered in all men hospitalized for COVID-19. Second, the demonstration of hypogonadism and impairment of spermatogenesis in men hospitalized with COVID-19 implies that measurement of serum testosterone and semen analysis should be repeated after recovery to rule out any persistent abnormalities that may compromise fertility. This evaluation is particularly important in patients in reproductive age who wish to have biological children.
Increasing evidence suggest that the testicles may be among the main targets of SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 may be associated with multiple abnormalities relevant to male gonadal function. These include the common occurrence of scrotal pain, evidence of orchitis and epididymitis, sex-hormone defects consistent with testicular failure (i.e. hypergonadotropic hypogonadism), and impairment of spermatogenesis. Furthermore, autopsy studies showing degeneration of germ cells, and inflammatory cell infiltration represent direct evidence of testicular involvement in patients who died from severe COVID-19. Meanwhile, the available studies suffer from several limitations such as inclusion of small number of subjects and unavailability of patients’ medical tests prior to COVID-19 infection for comparison (e.g. testosterone levels and semen analysis). In addition, none of the available studies performed regular follow-up of abnormal investigations from the time of start of acute COVID-19 infection until recovery and thereafter. The demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 in few semen specimens of COVID-19 patients, although uncommon, is somewhat disturbing. Nevertheless, it is unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 viral particles detected in semen are still infective, and if so, at what stage of the disease. While there is no current evidence that COVID-19 is sexually transmitted, caution should be exercised when managing the semen of patients recovering from COVID-19 for purposes of assisted reproduction and cryopreservation until definitive evidence is established.
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have conflicts of interest to declare.
Abbreviations
COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019
SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
ACE2; angiotensin-converting enzyme
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
