AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/055
Lecturer in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine - AinShams University; Egypt, address:Nasr city, Cairo, Egypt
*Corresponding Author: Ahmed Mohammed ElMaraghy, Lecturer in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine - AinShams University; Egypt, address:Nasr city, Cairo, Egypt
Citation: Ahmed Mohamed Mamdouh, Adel Shafik Salah El-din, Mohamed Adel Azab M, Ahmed Mohammed ElMaraghy, (2021) Effect of the Modified Surgeon Assisted Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Time Required for First Analgesic Dose after Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: Randomized placebo-controlled, double blinded clinical trial. J Women Health Care Issues, 4(3); Doi:10.31579/2642-9756/055
Copyright: © 2021 Ahmed Mohammed ElMaraghy, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 02 April 2021 | Accepted: 12 April 2021 | Published: 19 April 2021
Keywords: transversus abdominis plane block; cesarean section; bupivacaine; spinal anesthesia; opioids; postoperative analgesia
Background: The transverses abdominis plane block (TAP block) is one of the widely used regional analgesic techniques in cesarean section. There are different variations of the procedure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of the modified surgeon assisted bilateral TAP block in patients undergoing cesarean section
Patients&Methods: Sixty patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups to receive either TAP block with 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%(study group) or 40 ml normal saline as placebo after obtaining informed consent. All patients will receive intravenous diclofencac75mg every 12 hrs postoperatively. Postoperatively, there was an assessment every 2hrs during the first 24hrs by the visual analogue pain scale (VAPS). Time to the first analgesic request will be measured as primary outcome and all patients will receive opioid on demand or VAPS > 4 with 25mg pethidine intramuscularly. Moreover, total opioid requirement in 24hrs will be measured as secondary outcome along with postoperative complications as nausea, vomiting and abdominal distention. Complications related to the TAP procedure will be also assessed.
Results: The median (interquartile range) time to the first analgesic request in the first 24hrs postoperatively was significantly shorter in the placebo group compared to the study group; 4h (4, 6) and 24h (10, 24) with p value < 0.001. Postoperative opioid requirement was significantly higher in the control group (30/30{100%}) than the study group (13/30{43.3%}). The median (interquartile range) number of opioid doses was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the study group; 2(2, 2) and 0(0, 1) respectively. At all points in the study, pain scores both were lower in the study group (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: The modified surgeon assisted bilateral TAP block is relatively new, safe and cost effective technique which provides adequate postoperative analgesia allowing for better maternal ambulation and better postoperative recovery.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT04623632
Postsurgical pain can adversely affect patient satisfaction and quality of life. Evidence suggests that effective handling of acute pain may have a positive impact on the development of chronic pain after the surgical procedure [1]. The proper management of postoperative pain after caesarean section is of paramount importance as it allows early mobilization and enhances breast-feeding [2]
Opioids are considered the corner stone of conventional analgesia with both systemic and neuraxial routes used. Neuraxial methods are effective and safe, however close monitoring and experienced hands should be available [3]. Despite being one of the most predominant drugs used for pain relief worldwide, side effects of opioids like nausea, vomiting, constipation and respiratory depression are frequently encountered which can have negative impact on the healthcare costs besides the increase in the overall morbidity [1].
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional analgesic technique which blocks T6–L1 nerve branches and has an evolving role in postoperative analgesia for lower abdominal surgeries [4]. Compared with morphine, TAP block has similar efficacy with the additional advantages of prolonged postoperative analgesia, less opioid consumption and fewer side effects [5].
Despite the fact that ultrasound guided TAP block is highly successful procedure and associated with very low rate of complications, it has been underutilized. The lack of training as well as the shortage of ultrasound devices are the most prominent reasons [6].
The modified surgeon assisted TAP block is a new technique which can be used in TAP block without the fear of complications in the blind landmark based approach. The advantage of this technique includes avoiding missing the second pop in obese and pregnant patients due to thinning of the internal oblique aponeurosis, reposition of the needle by surgeon if one enters the peritoneal cavity accidentally. Moreover, the possibility of visceral injury is largely reduced. Such simple technique is very useful for beginners who can use it safely without any fear of complication. However, there might be a chance of needle stick injury to the surgeon’s hand [6].
This was a randomized, placebo- controlled, double blinded controlled trial which was conducted during the period from the 20th of September 2020 to the 20th of March 2021. After obtaining informed consent, sixty pregnant women above 18 years of age were included in the study and were divided into two groups; the study group received TAP block with 40ml of bupivacaine 0.25ml using the modified surgeon assisted technique while the placebo group received 40 ml of normal saline as placebo using the same technique. Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2, patients scheduled for elective cesarean section (Category 4 CS) under spinal anesthesia at ≥ completed 37 weeks. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, major systemic medical disorder, allergy to bupivacaine, chronic pain disorders and those with intraoperative complications like postpartum hemorrhage, bowel or bladder injury were excluded.
The 60 patients who were included in our study were randomized through a computer-generated system into 2 groups; group T (TAP block) & group P (placebo). Each group included 30 patients. Allocation and concealment were done by sequentially sealed opaque envelopes. 60 envelopes were numbered serially from 1 to 60, 30 envelopes were the letter T and the other 30 were contain the letter P. In each envelope, the corresponding letter which denotes the allocated group was put according to the randomization table and then all envelopes were closed and put in one box. When the first patient arrives, the first envelope was opened and the patient was allocated according to the letter inside. An anesthesiologist not involved in the study prepared the syringes which were filled with either 40ml saline or 40ml of bupivacaine 0.25%. The surgeon who performed the procedure, the patient and the post-operative care providers were all blinded to the group assignment.
All participants received spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric 0.5%, bupivacaine 10mg. Before the closure of the peritoneum, TAP block was performed using the Modified Surgeon Assisted Bilateral TAP block described by Roy and Pattnaik as follows: the landmark is at the level of umbilicus 8 to 10 cm from midline bilaterally. A tiny nick is made in the skin with a 18G sharp needle to obliterate the cushion effect. Then an 18G Tuohy needle will be insert perpendicular to skin directing the needle slightly towards the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine just before the closure of peritoneum. After feeling 2 pops of external and internal oblique aponeurosis the drug or the placebo will be injected after aspiration. Once the plane is reached the surgeon places his hand inside the abdominal cavity at the level of needle insertion to reconfirm needle placement. A bleb is palpated by the surgeon as the injection continues. The backflow of drug after injection is one of the signs that drug has been deposited in the TAP plane. The same procedure is repeated on the other side so a bilateral TAP block is performed [6]. All patients included in the study received postoperative standard analgesic regimen in the form of diclofenac 75mg intravenously every 12 hrs after the procedure.
All the patients were assessed every 2hrs during the first 24hrs after the procedure. Visual analogue pain rating scale will be assessed ranging from 0: no pain to 10: worst imaginable pain and any patient with VAS ≥ 4 during any assessment point of time received 25 mg pethidine intramuscularly. The primary outcome of our study was the time to the first analgesic request defined as the time from the end of surgery until the patient's first request for analgesia. The secondary measures of outcome were the total pethidine requirement received in 24hrs by each patient in the study or control group, the number of doses and complications which included nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention and fever. Moreover, rare complications related to systemic absorption of bupivacaine like hypotension and arrhythmia were documented if happened.
The sample size was calculated based on PASS 11 program for sample size calculation and according to Srivastava et al, the expected mean time to first demand for analgesia in control group = 6.5 ± 2 hrs and in study group = 12 ±3 hrs, sample size of 30 patients per group can detect the difference between two groups with power > 99% and α – error 0.05. [7]. Data were fed to the computer and analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. The Kolmogorov- Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution of variables, comparisons between groups for categorical variables were assessed using Chi-square test. Student t-test was used to compare two groups for normally distributed quantitative variables. Mann Whitney test was used to compare between two groups for not normally distributed quantitative variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to showing the % of patients not requiring supplemental analgesia over time. The log rank test was used to determine the significance of difference. Significance of the obtained results was judged at p value < 0>
A total of 60 pregnant patients who underwent elective LSCS met the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study. 30 parturients were allocated to the TAP group and the 30 parturients were allocated to the placebo group. Maternal demographic data were similar in both groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1, 2).
Table 1: Comparison between the two studied groups according to age
Table 2: Comparison between the two groups according to other demographic data:
There was statistically significant difference regarding the operative time in minutes between the two groups; (mean ± SD): TAP group: 61.0 ± 9.77, placebo group: 54.33 ± 6.12 with p value 0.002 (Table 3).
Table 3: Comparison between the two groups according to the operative time
The primary outcome of the study was the time to the first analgesic request which was significantly shorter among the placebo group; median (IQR) = 4h (4, 6) in the placebo group compared with 24h (10, 24) in the active group (Table 4).
Regarding the postoperative opioid consumption, it was significantly greater in the placebo group; all of the 30 participants in the placebo group required postoperative opioids compared to only 13 participants in the active group (43.3%) with p-value <0>(Table 5).
Table 5: Comparison between the two groups according to number of opioid doses required:
Regarding the mobilization time, it was significantly shorter among the TAP group (mean ± SD: 4.13 ± 0.57) compared with the placebo group (mean ± SD: 6.53 ± 1.04) with p value < 0>(Table 6).
Table 6: Comparison between the two groups according to mobilization time after the operation:
With each assessment during the first 24hrs postoperatively, the visual analogue pain rating scale was significantly lower in the active arm of the study compared with the placebo arm (p < 0>
Table 7: Comparison between the two groups according to the numerical pain rating visual analogue scale after surgery:
The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to showing the % of patients not requiring supplemental analgesia over time. (Figure.2). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding postoperative nausea (2 patients in the active group and 3 patients in the control group suffered from mild nausea) and no complications related to bupivacaine toxicity was reported.
Effective pain control is an important aspect of recovery for women after caesarean delivery [8]. Although a variety of choices of drugs and routes of administration are available, we are yet to achieve a safe and effective method of pain control after LSCS(3).The aim of the current study is to evaluate effect of the modified surgeon assisted bilateral TAP block on postoperative analgesia after cesarean section.
As for the time to the first analgesic request, it was significantly longer among the active group. Such results were similar to that obtained by Buluc et al., who evaluated the effect of ultrasound guided TAP block with 60 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine; the time to the first request for analgesia was longer in the active group with p value = 0.003 [9]. Jadon et al., also found similar results with 0.375% ropivacaine used for ultrasound guided TAP on 67 patients who underwent scheduled LSCS. The median (IQR) time to first analgesic request was 11 h [8,12] in the TAP group and 4 h (2.5,6) in the study group with P value < 0>
The total postoperative opioid requirement was significantly less among the TAP group as only 13% required postoperative opioids compared to 100% of the placebo group. The placebo group consumed significantly more opioid doses in the postoperative period.
Kupiec et al., also achieved similar results in their study which tested the efficacy of bupivacaine 0.25% as the active component of the ultrasound guided TAP block. The active group of the study showed less on demand tramadol consumption which was delivered via patient controlled analgesia method with p value = 0.005 [10].
The analgesic efficacy of TAP block with bupivacaine was also demonstrated by Tarekegn et al., who showed that the total postoperative tramadol consumption in the first 24 hours was significantly less among the TAP block group compared with the control group with p value = 0.001[11].
The Numerical pain rating visual analogue scale was measured every 2hrs during the first 24hrs postoperatively and there was statistically significant difference between the two groups with less scores obtained in the TAP block group. Similar results were shown in the study obtained by Jadon et al., who assessed VAS during rest and movement [3]. Eslamian et al., also demonstrated similar results regarding the postoperative VAS which was measured in the recovery room, 6, 12 and 24hrs after the procedure with coughing and during rest. With the exception of the VAS measured after 24hrs at rest, there was a significant difference in the VAS for pain both at rest and during coughing [12].
There were no complications related to TAP block systemic toxicity in our study. However, such complications are rare and larger studies with bigger sample size are needed to detect such complications. Our study was not without limitations. The VAS was measured without documenting whether it was measured during rest or movement; the postoperative analgesia was not delivered via the patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps since it’s not always available at our institute.
The Modified assisted surgeon bilateral TAP block is effective technique for providing postoperative analgesia for patients scheduled for elective LSCS under spinal anesthesia via Pfannenstiel incision. It has significant effect on the postoperative pain, time required for the first analgesia, the total postoperative opioid consumption. It can be performed by the surgeon who performed the cesarean section without the need for ultrasound device.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
