A Case Report: Successful Cardiac Catheterization Management of Post-Glenn complete Thrombosis of the Left Pulmonary Artery and Severe SVC to RPA Anastomosis Stenosis in a 1- Year-Old Infant

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/339

A Case Report: Successful Cardiac Catheterization Management of Post-Glenn complete Thrombosis of the Left Pulmonary Artery and Severe SVC to RPA Anastomosis Stenosis in a 1- Year-Old Infant

  • M. Abdelbaki 1*
  • M.Touati 2

1 Laghouat Hospital.

2 CMCI Bouismail (Algeria).

*Corresponding Author: M. Abdelbaki, Cardiovascular Surgery Department Ehs M.A. Maouche El Biar Algiers.

Citation: M. Abdelbaki, M.Touati (2023), A Case Report: Successful Cardiac Catheterization Management of Post-Glenn complete Thrombosis of the Left Pulmonary Artery and Severe SVC to RPA Anastomosis Stenosis in a 1- Year-Old Infant. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 6(8); DOI:10.31579/2641-0419/339

Copyright: © 2023, M. Abdelbaki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 18 October 2023 | Accepted: 26 October 2023 | Published: 17 November 2023

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; essential thrombocytemia; cardiovascular surgery

Abstract

The Glenn palliation is a vital step in the staged surgical management of patients with single ventricle physiology. While it offers hemodynamic improvement, certain post-operative complications can be life-threatening.

Case Presentation: We report a case of a 1-year-old with single ventricle physiology, who underwent Glenn palliation and subsequently presented with severe complications, including complete thrombosis of the left pulmonary artery (LPA) and significant stenosis at the superior vena cava-right pulmonary artery (SVC-RPA) anastomotic site. The child presented clinically with profound cyanosis and features suggestive of superior vena cava syndrome. These complications were successfully managed via cardiac catheterization, with repermeabilization of the LPA and stenting of both the LPA and SVC-RPA junction.

Introduction

The Glenn procedure, also known as the bidirectional Glenn or hemi-Fontan operation, represents an intermediate stage in the surgical palliation of patients with single ventricle congenital heart defects. By directing the superior vena cava (SVC) blood flow directly to the pulmonary arteries, the Glenn procedure aims to reduce the volume load on the single ventricle while providing passive pulmonary blood flow. This improves oxygen saturation levels and preconditions the pulmonary vascular bed for the subsequent Fontan procedure.

Despite its benefits, the Glenn operation is not devoid of potential complications. These can range from mild and self- limiting issues to severe life-threatening scenarios, the latter of which mandates prompt recognition and intervention. Thrombosis of the pulmonary arteries and stenosis at the SVC-pulmonary artery anastomotic site are among the more severe complications that can profoundly affect a patient's clinical status.

In this   report, we   delve  into   a particularly challenging case of a 1-year- old post-Glenn palliation, highlighting the complexities encountered and the therapeutic strategies employed for a favorable outcome.

Case Presentation:

A 1-year-old patient with a history of single ventricle physiology, post-Glenn palliation,

Clinical presentation:

Severe cyanosis and lethargy.

Oxygen Saturation: Significantly reduced on pulse oximetry, consistent with the  patient's cyanotic presentation.

Head and Neck Examination:

Facial Edema: Swelling was evident, particularly around the eyes and cheeks.

Jugular Venous Distention (JVD): Prominent jugular veins were noticeable, consistent with superior vena cava syndrome.

Echocardiography findings:

Single Ventricle Physiology: Echocardiography confirmed the anatomy of a dominant Right ventricular chamber, consistent with the patient's known single ventricle physiology.

Systemic Venous Return:

Superior Vena Cava (SVC) Flow: Turbulent flow was visualized in the SVC, suggesting significant obstruction or stenosis at the site of its anastomosis with the right pulmonary artery.

Pulmonary Artery (PA) Evaluation:

Right Pulmonary Artery (RPA): Normal flow and patency were observed.

Left Pulmonary Artery (LPA): Absence of color flow Doppler signal in the LPA, suggestive of complete occlusion or thrombosis.

Angiography:

1. Superior Vena Cava (SVC) to Right Pulmonary Artery (RPA) Anastomosis:

Stenosis: 

  • A localized narrowing was visualized at the SVC-RPA anastomotic site. The narrowing was consistent with stenosis and demonstrated turbulent flow during the contrast injection.

2. Left Pulmonary Artery (LPA): 

Complete Occlusion: 

The LPA showed a complete lack of contrast opacification, indicating full thrombosis or occlusion.

1. Preparation: 

  • Sedate the patient appropriately, ensuring airway patency and vital sign stability.
  • Sterilize and drape the chosen catheterization site(s), commonly the femoral vein and/or artery.

1. Vascular Access:

  • Utilizing a needle, puncture the jugulare internal vein. 
  • Introduce a sheath over the guidewire to maintain venous access.

Initial Assessment:

  • Perform a baseline angiogram to visualize the anatomy and confirm suspected complications (see above).

Recanalization of Thrombosed LPA:

  • Under fluoroscopic guidance, navigate a hydrophilic guidewire across the occluded segment of the LPA.
  • Use balloon Tayshak II 6 mm to open up the occluded segment by inflating the balloon at the site of occlusion.
  • Deploy the stent, alleviating the stenosis.
  • Again, validate stent placement and improved flow with an angiogram.

Stenting of the LPA:

  • Position a Formula 6/16 stent over the guidewire, ensuring accurate placement across the previously occluded segment.
  • Deploy the stent by inflating the balloon. The stent expands and scaffolds the vessel open.
  • Confirm stent position and patency via angiography.
  • Addressing SVC-RPA Anastomosis Stenosis:
  • Direct the guidewire across the stenosed SVC-RPA junction.
  • Position another stent Formula 10/20 mm over this guidewire, ensuring it spans the stenotic segment.

Discussion:

In children with single ventricle physiology who have undergone Glenn palliation, the postoperative period can present with an array of complications. Two such severe complications are thrombosis of a major pulmonary artery and significant stenosis at the anastomotic site of the 

superior vena cava (SVC) with the pulmonary artery. In the described scenario, the child manifested both these complications

Surgical Intervention:

  • Surgical revision of the Glenn palliation or direct surgical correction of the noted complications is a possibility. However, reoperation carries inherent risks, especially if the child is hemodynamically unstable or if there are other contraindications for surgery.

1. Cardiac Catheterization:

  • This allows for both diagnostic assessment and therapeutic interventions. Balloon angioplasty can open stenosed areas, and stents can maintain vessel patency. Thrombosed arteries can be recanalized using catheter-based techniques.

Why Choose Cardiac Catheterization?: 

Minimally Invasive: Compared to surgical intervention, cardiac catheterization is less invasive, thus reducing recovery time and potential morbidity.

Immediate Relief: The interventions, like stenting or balloon angioplasty, can provide immediate hemodynamic benefit by addressing the obstruction or thrombosis.

Versatility: Catheterization offers the flexibility to manage multiple issues in one setting. In this case, both the SVC stenosis and LPA thrombosis could be addressed.

Reduced Risk: Avoiding reoperation minimizes risks associated with general anesthesia, surgical wound complications, and postoperative adhesions.

Diagnostic & Therapeutic: Cardiac catheterization allows for immediate angiographic assessment, verifying the success of the interventions and ensuring other areas are not compromised.

Trending Practice: Over the years, the success and safety of catheter-based interventions in congenital heart disease have burgeoned, making it a preferable option in select scenarios.

In conclusion, the decision to pursue cardiac catheterization in this child was based on the severity and complexity of the complications, the immediate therapeutic options available through catheterization, and the aim to avoid more invasive surgical re-interventions. As always, the choice of therapy should be individualized, considering the specific anatomy, the patient's clinical condition, and the expertise of the treating team.

Conclusion:

The management of children with single ventricle physiology, particularly following Glenn palliation, is complex and multifaceted. The emergence of severe complications, such as significant stenosis at the anastomotic site and complete thrombosis of major pulmonary arteries, emphasizes the critical need for meticulous post-operative monitoring and early intervention. These complications not only deteriorate hemodynamics but also jeopardize the patient's candidacy for future palliative stages.

In this reported case, the successful utilization of cardiac catheterization demonstrated its pivotal role in the contemporary management of post-Glenn complications. By allowing for real-time diagnostic evaluation and simultaneous therapeutic intervention, catheterization offers a minimally invasive yet efficacious avenue to restore pulmonary blood flow and rectify hemodynamic imbalances.

The choice of cardiac catheterization over other therapeutic options was underscored by its ability to offer immediate relief, minimize potential morbidity associated with reoperations, and provide comprehensive assessment of the circulatory system. Moreover, the intervention exemplifies the growing trend and trust in catheter-based procedures in pediatric cardiology, driven by technological advancements and growing expertise.

It is imperative for clinicians to be cognizant of the potential complications following Glenn palliation, to detect them early, and to have a strategic blueprint for management. Cardiac catheterization, as evidenced in this case, can be the linchpin in achieving optimal outcomes and setting the stage for successful future interventions.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad