AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/222
1Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110001
2Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh
*Corresponding Author: Ujjwal Kumar Chowdhury, Professor Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, INDIA
Citation: Ujjwal Kumar Chowdhury, Niwin George, Lakshmi Kumari Sankhyan, Gaind Saurabh, Shweta Sharma1, Shikha Goja M, Niraj Nirmal Pandey. (2021) An Alternative Technique of Intraoperative Identification of Multiple Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects. J. Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(17); Doi:10.31579/2641-0419/222
Copyright: © 2021 Ujjwal Kumar Chowdhury, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 10 September 2021 | Accepted: 11 November 2021 | Published: 15 November 2021
Keywords: ventricular septum; multiple ventricular septal defects; left ventricle
We propose the passage of a thick black braided silk SUTUPAK silk suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) through the additional muscular ventricular septal defects to facilitate patch closure of the multiple muscular ventricular septal defects.
Despite advancements in surgical and interventional techniques, closure of multiple muscular ventricular septal defects (VSDs) is associated with significant perioperative mortality, residual VSDs, ventricular dysfunction, and complete heart block. [1-4]
An analysis of operations in the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database during the 4-year time period of 2005 through 2008 inclusive, revealed the following four findings:
1. Multiple VSDs take longer to close.
2. When compared with the more common perimembranous VSD, the rate of heart block is three times higher with muscular VSDs and multiple VSDs.
3. When compared with the more common perimembranous VSD, the rate of unplanned reoperation is over four times higher with muscular VSDs, and almost twice as high with multiple VSDs.
4. When compared with the more common perimembranous VSD, the rate of mortality before discharge from the hospital is over twice as high with muscular VSDs and over three times as high (8.5%) with multiple VSDs. [1]
These complications primarily results from difficulties associated with inadequate exposure and closure. We report the technique and results in 5 patients with multiple muscular VSDs with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) using a No. 3 SUTUPAK silk suture through a transtricuspid approach.
Between January 2019 and May 2021, 5 patients underwent patch closure of multiple muscular VSDs by a single surgeon (corresponding author) using the surgical technique described after informed written consent from their parents / guardians.
Their ages at the time of operation were 2, 3, 4, 3 and 3 months respectively. Their weights were 3.2, 3.6, 4.0, 3.6, and 3.4 kg respectively. Two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography demonstrated multiple VSDs with evidence of severe PAH. Intraoperatively, pulmonary arterial pressure (systolic/diastolic) ranged between 98/32 to 110/36 mmHg.
Operative Technique
We used a transtricuspid approach to close the multiple muscular VSDs in these patients. On moderately hypothermic CPB, the heart was arrested using St. Thomas based cold blood cardioplegia (Figures 1A-1F).
A right atriotomy was fashioned and a left ventricular vent (Medtronic DLP, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn) was inserted through the patent foramen ovale or a surgically created atrial septostomy. The larger VSD could be easily located via the tricuspid valve. A blunt tip right angled forceps was negotiated through the suspected location of the muscular VSD’s gently without the use of any force except for the weight of the angled clamp. A DeBakey forcep was held in the left ventricle through larger inlet muscular VSD or through the atrioseptostomy. The metallic sound of the two metal tips touching each other indicated that the right angled clamp has negotiated the muscular defect.
Since the additional muscular VSD was apically located and was covered with muscular trabeculae, a No.3 SUTUPAK silk suture (Ivory Braided silk, SW 218, Johnson and Johnson Inc, Somerville, NJ) was looped through the apical VSD to facilitate exposure. Precautions were taken to ensure placement of the tip of the blunt right angled forceps to the margins of the VSD while grasping the silk under vision to avoid inadvertent injury to the mitral valve.
Gentle traction of the silk loop in different directions allowed complete closure of the VSDs without division of the moderator band or right ventricular trabeculae and avoided a left ventriculotomy.
Both VSD’s were closed individually using a knitted Dacron polyester patch Bard® Savage® filamentous knitted polyester fabric, Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA), and multiple interrupted 4-0 polypropylene pledgeted mattress sutures. Pledgeted sutures were strategically placed circumferentially in order to secure the patch and prevent diminution of the right ventricular cavity or inflow occlusion across the inlet septum.
The tricuspid valve was checked for functional competence by insufflation of saline into the right ventricle. This maneuver is also useful for verifying obliteration of any residual defect, by observing the amount of saline returning from the left ventricular vent. The atrial septal defect was closed.
Pacing wires were placed and tested regardless of the rhythm. Patients were weaned off CPB in the usual manner. After placement of two patches, transient period of septal akinesis or dyskinesis was common. Following intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, blood samples were taken from the SVC and the pulmonary artery for oxymetry. It did not reveal any step-up of oxygen saturation in the pulmonary artery. Postoperative management included the use of inodilators and pulmonary vasodilators. Postoperative echocardiography revealed normalization of pulmonary arterial pressure, intact atrial and ventricular septa without any residual shunting.
There were no early or late deaths on follow-up visit ranging from 18-20 months. Doppler echocardiography revealed normal biventricular function and absence of any residual VSDs with systemic arterial oxygen saturation ranging from 96%-99%.
Optimal management of multiple muscular VSDs remain controversial. Myriad of surgical techniques have been described, including initial pulmonary artery banding, use of an “oversized pericardial patch” into the left or right ventricle after dividing the moderator band, and septomarginal trabeculae, use of a composite patch of pericardium and Dacron with or without transfixation sutures in the middle of the patch, use of biologic glue, the felt sandwich technique, transatrial reendocardialization technique, septal obliteration technique, two-patch, and right ventricular apex exclusion technique, and a hybrid strategy with perventricular device closure. [3-14]
Although different groups have achieved successful results with individual strategies, each technique is associated with important limitations, and long-term results of most of these techniques are not available.
The moderator band and multiple trabeculations beneath trabecular VSD create a multiperforated wall that hides the trabecular VSD, especially those located at the apex. The key to closure of multiple VSDs is accurate identification, edge detection, and proper cavitary entry. The presence of numerous muscular trabeculations on the right-side of the ventricular septum creates uncertainties in defining the true edges of the VSD. Division of the moderator band and trabeculae have been performed to clearly define the margins of the VSDs. [4,6,7]
Although the use of an apical left ventriculotomy to improve exposure of VSD has facilitated more accurate repair, without late adverse sequelae in many series, several investigators have reported late apical aneurysm formation, ventricular arrhythmia, left ventricular dysfunction, and cardiac transplantation. [1,9-11,14]
In an effort to improve exposure of the margins of VSD without transecting the trabeculae or the moderator band, we railroaded the ductus silk suture through the apical VSD which facilitated placement of deep pledgeted sutures around margins of the VSD.
It is true that this technique only works if each secondary VSD has been definitely identified by passage of the right angle forceps. However, in cases of true “Swiss-cheese VSDs”, it remains difficult to ascertain the true margins of all defects located within the right ventricular apex through the transtricuspid route, and this technique is indeed useful in cases of isolated multiple VSDs. An alternative approach of oversized patch technique, septal obliteration/exclusion technique or cardiac transplantation may be chosen in cases of severe forms of “Swiss-cheese VSDs”. [1,3,4,6,7]
Looping and traction of a thick silk suture around the additional muscular VSDs may allow optimal visualization of the margins of VSD to facilitate placement of sutures without having to resort to division of the trabeculae or septal band, thereby avoiding residual defects.
We submit this technique as a useful addendum in the armamentarium of congenital heart surgeons dealing with multiple ventricular septal defects.
Author’s contribution
Statement of human rights/ethical approval: The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this study comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation and with the Helsinki declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
No potential conflicts exist
No funding was provided
Data available in article supplementary material
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
