AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-973X/094
*Corresponding Author: Faruk İncecik, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Adana, Turkey
Citation: Faruk İncecik, (2024) Neutrophil‐to‐Lymphocyte and Platelet‐to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Children with Autoimmune Encephalitis, J Brain and Neurological Disorders; 7(1): DOI: 10.31579/2642-973X/094
Copyright: © 2024, Faruk İncecik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 22 December 2023 | Accepted: 26 December 2023 | Published: 05 January 2024
Keywords: NLR; PLR; inflammatory markers; autoimmune encephalitis.
Objective: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a rapidly progressive encephalopathy caused by antibody-mediated neuroinflammation. There is no established specific inflammatory marker of AE. Recently, blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have proposed as a potentially useful markers of clinical outcome in diseases with an inflammatory component. The aim of this study was to clarify the association of NLR and PLR in children with AE.
Method: Fourteen patients with AE (7 males and 7 females) were enrolled in the study. NLR and PLR were calculated using complete blood count data.
Results: The mean NLR and PLR were 2.68 ± 0.22, and 127.07 ± 9.30, respectively in patients pre-treatment. The mean NLR and PLR levels were 1.74 ± 0.67, and 121.25 ± 6.34, respectively in patients after treatment. NLR level was significantly higher in pre-treatment time than after treatment.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study which investigated the role of NLR and PLR as inflammatory biomarkers in patients with AE. Our results demonstrate that NLR is higher in pre-treatment period compared with after improvement period. However, PLR level was not statistically significant. NLR, a simple and easily obtainable parameter, may be potential inflammatory marker in children with AE.
Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is characterized by an acute to subacute onset of seizures, cognitive impairment, and psychiatric symptoms [1]. AE might be associated with antibodies against neuronal cell surface or synaptic proteins. Several antibodies have been demonstrated to be associated with paraneoplastic and nonparaneoplastic neurological syndromes. The most common antibody associated with AE in children is antibodies against N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) [1,2]. Unlike adult AE, association with cancer is less frequent in children [3]. Early diagnosis and treatment leads to better neurocognitive outcomes. Therefore, the identification of useful biomarkers is imperative to provide timely and adequate interventions to patients with AE.
In recent studies, novel inflammatory biomarkers such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been proposed as indicators of systemic inflammation and infection [4-6]. NLR and PLR are easily measurable laboratory biomarkers affected by both natural immune response and acquired immune response [7,8]. There is not a study established the association with NLR and PLR with AE. The aim of this study was to determine a possible association between NLR and PLR level and AE in children.
Patients who were diagnosed with AE with antibody positivity between 2016 and 2020 were included in the study. The data were retrospectively collected from the clinic files and included age, sex, time of onset of symptoms, electroencephalogram (EEG), cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, antibody type, complete blood count (CBC), white blood cell (WBC), NLR, PLR, and treatment.
Autoimmune encephalitis was diagnosed by pediatric neurologists in our hospital on the basis of clinical findings and the presence of specific antibodies in serum or CSF. All suspected reasons of central nervous system infection were excluded as well as encephalopathy secondary to sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome. All patients were screened for malignancy; no tumors were identified. First-line immunotherapy included high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), or combination of these.
NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. PLR was calculated by dividing the platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count. All tests have been obtained before and after the treatment.
Statistical analysis was performed. For comparisons of the differences between mean values of before and after treatment groups, the paired Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test were used with or without a normal distribution, respectively. To test whether the data showed a normal distribution, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used. The chi-square test was used for calculation of the significance of differences in gender. The Pearson’s test was used to identify the correlations. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and it was approved by the Ethical Committee (Number: 2021/11).
A total of 14 AE patients (7 males and 7 females) were evaluated. In all of them 11 patients (x.5) had anti-GAD encephalitis, two patients (.2) had anti-NMDAR encephalitis, and one patient (%7.3) had anti-LGI1 encephalitis. The mean age of the patients was 10.50 ± 4.05 years. In treatment, IVIg plus IVMP therapy was performed in 9 patients (64.2%), IVIg plus plasmapheresis (PE) therapy was performed in 2 patients (14.2%), and IVIg plus plasmapheresis plus IVMP therapy was performed in 3 patients (21.6%). In prognosis, 10 patients (71.4%) had complete recovery, 3 (21.4%) patients had behavior disorder, and one (7,2.0%) patient had epilepsy.
The mean NLR levels of pre and after treatment were 2.68 ± 0.22, and 1.74 ± 0.67, respectively. The mean PLR levels of pre and after treatment were 127.07 ± 9.30, and 121.25 ± 6.34, respectively. The mean pre-treatment NLR level was significantly higher than after treatment (p < 0> 0.05) (Table 1)
| Before treatment | After treatment | P value | |
| WBC | 12.11 ± 1.06 | 8.68 ± 1.39 | 0.001 |
| NLR | 2.68 ± 0.22 | 1.74 ± 0.67 | 0.001 |
| PLR | 127.07 ± 9.30 | 121.25 ± 6.34 | 0.061 |
AE: autoimmune encephalitis, NLR: neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, PLR: platelet-lymphocyte ratio, WBC: white blood cell
Table 1: Comparison of Laboratory Findings Of The Patients With Ae Before And After Treatment
Autoimmune encephalitis is emerging as an important and relatively common cause of encephalitis in the developed world. Crucially, early recognition and prompt initiation of a range of immunotherapies is likely to improve the outcomes of patients with AE, particularly for those with identifiable antibodies against neuronal cell surface proteins. There are a rapidly growing number of specific autoantibodies and associated syndromes, but many of these remain very rare [1]. There is no specific inflammation marker for AE.
NLR and PLR, which are ratios that can be easily measured from a CBC for a low cost, were shown to be related to many medical pathologies [7,8]. In literature, recent studies have shown that an abnormal NLR and PLR level are related to autoimmune diseases [9-12]. Arpaci et al. [11] found that NLR and PLR were significantly different in a group of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis patients compared to healthy individuals in a study. Erre et al. [5] reported that NLR and PLR were significantly higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis when compared to controls. In another study, Ozdemir [12] found that NLR and PLR level were statistically significant biomarkers in Guillain-Barre´ syndrome subtype in adults. In our study, we detected that NLR level was significantly higher of in active state of the AE. However, there was no marked differences in PLR level. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first clinical study to evaluate the association of AE with the NLR and PLR level in children.
In conclusion, recognition, evaluation, and treatment of AE are growing in the last years. To facilitate early diagnosis, pediatricians need to maintain a high level of suspicion. The importance of considering autoimmune pathogenesis in the differential diagnosis of encephalitis is crucial, as early recognition and treatment may affect the outcome. We detected that NLR level was found significantly higher active state of disease. This finding suggests that NLR may be a potential marker to evaluate the disease activity of AE. However, more study in future is needed to support this.
Source of funding
The authors declare the study received no funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
