Opinion | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/vns.2021/008
*Corresponding Author: Abdulwahab Alahmari, Department of Anatomy Radiology Specialist, King Saud niversity, Saudi Arabia
Citation: Abdulwahab F. Alahmari, (2021) MRI brain documentation. J Vascular Neurology and Stroke. 4(1); DOI:10.31579/vns.2021/008
Copyright: © 2021 Abdulwahab F. Alahmari, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 24 April 2021 | Accepted: 11 May 2021 | Published: 13 May 2021
Keywords: Keywords
Abstract
In many clinical cases, a patient may come to the hospital with a neurological abnormality. This patient happen to have a normal brain MRI study that is recorded on the picture archiving and communicating system (PACs) of that hospital. The previous normal study will help in identifying any pathology take place in the future easily. What if all the patients did have a previous studies for the brain as some kind of documentation? It will help a lot. The aim of this paper is to propose a new idea that required for all the citizens in a country to have a normal brain MRI study recorded on their medical file and this MRI study updated every five years by undertaking an MRI scan.
The usefulness of this idea can be imply in different ways. For example; when a patient affected by any type of neurological issue, we have a morphological documentation for the brain prior to that neurological event took a place. As well, this is will provide a database for researchers to find pre and post neurological event documentation. Furthermore, it will help in detecting and documenting senile atrophic changes over the time. Sometime patients will have a “silent stroke” which has no symptoms which can be detected by the brain MRI scan.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
