AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/120
19-D, Transymuna colony, Rambagh, Agra (U.P).
*Corresponding Author: Surabhi Gupta, 19-D, Transymuna colony, Rambagh, Agra (U.P)
Citation: Surabhi Gupta. (2022). Pattern of Bacterial Infections in Cancer Patients -Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Center. Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics. 6(4); Doi:10.31579/2640-1053/120
Copyright: © 2022 Surabhi Gupta, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 May 2022 | Accepted: 26 May 2022 | Published: 06 June 2022
Keywords: bacterial infections; cancer patients; tertiary cancer center
It is a general belief that cancer patients are more prone to infections, particularly bacterial infections. Firstly, disease itself present an immuno-compromised status, secondarily chemotherapy and radiotherapy further suppress the immunity level which is further overburden by poor nutritional state and poor hygienic conditions in these patients. With the invent of better diagnostic modalities and many technological advancement in treatment delivery, the mortality rates have fallen over the past years, but infection remains a primary or associated cause of death, with bacteria most commonly accounting for infection-associated mortality, followed by fungi.
The management of the infections is based on the use of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapeutic agents with a comprehensive understanding of pathogens which are the commonly encountered in cancer patients in day-to-day practice and also understanding of antibiotic sensitivity patterns. Though the empirical use of antibiotics has reduced the mortality in patients but has also led to the menace of multidrug-resistant bacteria.
It is a general belief that cancer patients are more prone to infections, particularly bacterial infections. Firstly, disease itself present an immuno-compromised status, secondarily chemotherapy and radiotherapy further suppress the immunity level which is further overburden by poor nutritional state and poor hygienic conditions in these patients. With the invent of better diagnostic modalities and many technological advancement in treatment delivery, the mortality rates have fallen over the past years, but infection remains a primary or associated cause of death, with bacteria most commonly accounting for infection-associated mortality, followed by fungi [1].
The management of the infections is based on the use of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapeutic agents with a comprehensive understanding of pathogens which are the commonly encountered in cancer patients in day-to-day practice and also understanding of antibiotic sensitivity patterns. Though the empirical use of antibiotics has reduced the mortality in patients but has also led to the menace of multidrug-resistant bacteria [2].
Multidrug-resistant bacteria are commonly encountered among immuno-compromised patients. So it is necessary to be aware with the ever changing spectrum of infection and sensitivity pattern so that judicial and effective use of these drugs can be done with successful control of infections among cancer patients.
This present study aims to evaluate the common types of bacterial infections and their antibiotic susceptibility spectrum in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors.
This study was undertaken to monitor the types of pathogens commonly found in cancer patients undergoing anticancer treatment and their antibiotic sensitivity and resistance patterns.
This study was conducted in department of radiation oncology and total 100 patients, who were admitted for chemotherapy in department from 1 may 2021 to 31st July 2021 were enrolled. Different samples were taken according to patient’s presentation. These samples were collected in our department and were sent to microbiology department for culture and sensitivity. Demographic and clinical data of patients were collected including age, sex, site of malignancy, site of infection, type of bacterial isolates, antibiotic sensitivity pattern and details of anthropometry, comorbidities, haematological examination results, and any procedures (urinary catheterization, central or peripheral IV cannulation, endotracheal intubation, and ventilator management) were collected. The collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed and results obtained are represented in the form of graphs and tables.
Inclusion criteria
1. Histopathological confirmed case of solid malignancy
2. Patients undergoing only chemotherapy
3. Age > 18 yrs.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients receiving immunotherapy or radiotherapy
2. Patient with any immunosuppressive status
Microbiological investigations
The clinical samples like pus, urine, vaginal swab, sputum, blood and stool received from suspected cases of infection and accordingly were stained for microscopical examination and inoculated onto blood agar, chocolate agar and macConkey’s agar (HiMedia) and incubated aerobically at 35 ᵒC for 24 to 48 hrs. Blood Culture is done by FX 40 (Bactec). Positive cultures were sub cultured onto blood agar, chocolate agar and Mac Conkey’s agar and incubated aerobically at 350C for 24hrs. Identification of the bacterial growth and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the isolates were interpreted as sensitive, resistant and Intermediate using the latest/ Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) Guidelines. Antibiotics used for Gram Positive Bacteria were Penicillin-G, Amoxicillin, Carbenicillin, Ticarcillin, Cefoxitin, Amoxy-clavulanic Acid, Ampicillin-Sulbactam, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Cefepime, Cefuroxime, Cefaclor, Cefodoxime, Ceftriaxone, Chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Erythromycin, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Doxycycline, Tetracycline, Clindamycin, Teicoplanin, Cotrimoxazole, Linezolid, Vancomycin , and for Gram Negative Bacteria are Ampicillin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Amoxicillin/ Clavulanic Acid, Ampicillin Sulbactam, Cephalothin, Cefaclor, Cefpodoxime, Ceftriaxone/Sulbctam, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Cefoperazone/Salbactam, Doxycycline, Tetracycline, Nitrofurantoin (urine), Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, Chloramphenicol, Amikacin, Gentamicin, Cotrimoxazole, Meropenem, Imipenem and for Pseudomonas are Amikacin, Meropenem, Piperacillin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, Cefepime, Tobramycin, Cefftazidime, Polymyxin-B, Aztreonam, Ciproflaxacin, Levofloxacin, Gemifloxacin . In urine sample we are using CLED Agar. In vaginal swab, the first swab is used to make a smear on clean grease-free glass slide for bacterial differentiation by Gram-Stain Examination and the second swab is used for the bacterial culture on blood agar and Mac Conkey’s agar.
A total 100 admitted patient were enrolled for the study. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed. Following results were obtained.
Figure no.1
Only patients of solid malignancies were taken in this study. Maximum number of patients belonged to head and neck cancer (53%) followed by carcinoma cervix (23%) and carcinoma breast (8%).
Figure No.2
Overall, 91% organism were gram negative bacteria.
Infection is a common complication of cancer and cancer treatment and certain types can be life-threatening if not found and treated early several factors increase the risk of infection in patients with solid tumors, and the presence of multiple risk factors in the same patient is not uncommon. These include obstruction (most often caused by progression of the tumor), disruption of natural anatomic barriers such as the skin and mucosal surfaces.
Infection is commonly encountered among cancer patients, leading to disturbances in the treatment regimen, prolonged hospitalization, increased cost of health care, and reduced survival. Important infections like bloodstream infections and pneumonia were major contributors to mortality in oncology patients. The previous studies have reported 36% mortality due to sepsis in cancer patients [3]. Pneumonia, sepsis, influenza, and parasitic infections have been documented among the deceased cancer patients [4].
In our study, most common site of infections seen was head and neck cancer cases (53%) followed by carcinoma cervix cases (23%), this may be attributed to poor oral, skin and genital hygiene. Carcinoma breast patients (8%) presented as large fungating mass. Carcinoma lung cases (5%) presented with lower respiratory tract infection.Maximum numbers of patients (35%) were of 41-50 years age group with male predominance.
In our study, 91% of the infections were associated with gram-negative organisms and only 9% were due to gram positive organisms. It is in contrast to the earlier reports from developed countries, where the incidence of infections caused by gram-positive bacteria is higher. In most of the studies from developed countries, around 70% of the infections are caused by gram-positive bacteria [5]. On the contrary, most studies conducted in developing countries have recorded that majority of infections were caused by gram-negative organisms [6].
Epidemiology of infections in cancer patients has changed across the globe overtime. In the study conducted by Siddaiahgari et al., Pseudomonas spp. was the most common causative organism of bloodstream infection, causing 36% of the bloodstream infections. E. coli accounted for 46.3% of the urinary tract infection. Characterized Gram-negative bacteria have predominated the scene as a major cause of infections in cancer patients in the last 20 years across the globe in many countries. Among gram-negative bacteria, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii have been increasingly associated with cancer patients [7]. The findings of a study conducted by Yadegarynia et al. in Texas showed that pneumonia was the most common infection seen in both the groups of patients with solid organ tumours (26%), as well as in patients with haematological malignancies (38%) [8]. In our study, soft tissue and skin infections (26%) and respiratory tract infections (26%) were more common compared from other studies other studies.
The epidemiology of most of these infections is changing with resistant organisms [MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms] being isolated more often than in the past [9]. A study done in New Delhi by Batra et al. noted 80% ESBL production rates among the gram-negative bugs [10]. In our study also, among gram negative bacteria ESBL status was known in 55% of growth, out of which ESBL producing microbes were 69.09%, while ESBL non-producing were 30.9%In gram positive bacterias, 33.33% were MRSA type.
In a study conducted by Sirisharani Siddaiahgari, the overall rank order of the most common pathogens was Pseudomonas spp. (26.2%) > Enterococcus spp. (11.66%) > S. aureus (11.44%) > E. coli (11.34%) > Klebsiella spp. (10.59%) >Acinetobacter spp. (9.95%) > Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (6.52%)> Streptococcus spp. (3.42%) > Enterobacter spp. (3.1%) > Burkholderia spp. (2.35%) [7].
This was not the case in our study, where rank order was Klebsiella spp. (41%) > Escherichia coli (38%) >Pseudomonas spp. (12%) > > Staphylococcus aureus (9%). In the study conducted by Siddaiahgari et al., Pseudomonas spp. was the most common causative organism of bloodstream infection, causing 36% of the bloodstream infections. E. coli accounted for 46.3% of the urinary tract[7].
In our study, klabesilla pneumoniae was the most common microbes in pus sample (37.03%), stool (50%) and sputum samples (57.69%). E. coli was common organism in urine (66.66%), vaginal swab (57.14%) and blood culture (40%). Pseudomonas auregenoa was commonly found in sputum(26.08%) ,pus (18.51%)and stool (7.14%),while staphylococcus aureus was seen in vaginal swab(14.28%) ,pus (11.11%) and sputum (8.69%).
In our study, we also correlated malignancy site wise organism correlation and found that Head and neck carcinoma patients were harboring klebsiella pneumoniae (49.05%) commonest followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.75%). In Ca breast pattern was klebsella pneumoniae (50%) followed by staphylococcus aureus (25%). In ca cervix case-E. coli (69.56%)> klebsiella pneumoniae (26.08%).In ca lung cases-E coli and klebsiella pneumoniae infections were similar(40
Implementation of judicial infection control practices would help in improving this dreaded situation. It is of necessary to restrict the use of antibiotics in all clinical practices. To successfully prevent, identify, and treat infections, knowledge of the changing epidemiology of infections is essential, that may lead to a personalised and cost-effective treatment with improving prognosis, and ensuring the judicial use of antibiotics.
Nil
There are no conflicts of interest
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
