AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/419
1Department of Internal Medicine, Mather Hospital at Northwell Health, Port Jefferson, NY
2Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV
*Corresponding Author: Chandra Divyash Chhetri, D.O., Department of Internal Medicine, Mather Hospital, Northwell Health, 75 N Country Rd, Port Jefferson, NY, 11777.
Citation: Divyash Chhetri C, Sarmad Al Obaidi, Michael V. Dicaro, Mahmood Yaseen, Salman Syed, (2024), Long QT syndrome due to Doxylamine overdose, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 17(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/419
Copyright: © 2024, Chandra Divyash Chhetri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 13 March 2024 | Accepted: 16 March 2024 | Published: 02 April 2024
Keywords: doxylamine; long QT syndrome; arrhythmia; antihistamine; anticholinergic
The list of medications known to induce QT prolongation is long. We report here a case of long QT syndrome (LQTS) caused by use of Doxylamine, which has previously only been reported once. The patient arrived to the emergency department after having ingested two bottles of Doxylamine (roughly 96 tablets) in a suicidal attempt and was noted to have seizure-like activity prior to arrival. Upon admission she was found to have severe rhabdomyolysis and significant QTc prolongation (>650 ms). Her clinical status improved over the course of hospitalization with supportive treatment that included intravenous fluids as well as electrolyte monitoring and replacement. Given the relative ubiquity of Doxylamine, the purpose of this article is to raise awareness of a unique adverse effect of a widely available medication.
Doxylamine is an antihistamine used to treat allergic symptoms and is often used as a short-term treatment of insomnia. It is also used in combination with pyridoxine (vitamin B6) to treat morning sickness in pregnant women [1]. Doxylamine is available over-the-counter and is used in nighttime cold medications such as Nyquil, as well as in analgesics containing acetaminophen or codeine. Along with its antagonist effects of the H1 receptor, Doxylamine also exerts anticholinergic properties and serves as a rather potent antagonist of the muscarinic acetylcholine (M1-M5) receptors [2]. In large amounts, Doxylamine can induce hallucinations, seizures, rhabdomyolysis, and death.
LQTS is a condition affecting repolarization of the heart. Many drugs have been implicated in LQTS, including first- and second-generation antihistamines, but the incidence of Doxylamine-induced LQTS has previously only been reported once [3]. The mechanistic basis of acquired LQTS is thought to be due to blockade of the potassium channels, for which many pharmacologic agents have an affinity [4].
The patient is a 22-year-old female with a medical history of depression and anxiety, with multiple past suicidal attempts by drug overdose, who was brought in by her roommate for a suspected drug overdose. She was unable to provide any history upon arrival in the emergency department due to altered mental status. Her roommate further endorsed that the patient may have had seizure-like activity that lasted for about one minute. Upon further questioning, it was found that the patient had ingested two bottles (approximately 96 tablets) of Doxylamine succinate. In the ED, the patient was hemodynamically stable, but confused, restless, disoriented, and actively hallucinating.
Initial labs revealed significantly elevated CPK levels of 16,775 U/L and a WBC count of 15,000. Her urine toxicology was positive for benzodiazepines. The AST was mildly elevated at 76 U/L. The rest of her labs, including all electrolytes, were within normal limits. She was immediately started on Lactated Ringer’s at a rate of 250 cc/hr and a 150 mEq sodium bicarbonate infusion at a rate of 150 cc/hr. Her initial ECG at the time of admission demonstrated normal sinus rhythm and a QTc of 440 ms (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Initial ECG demonstrated normal sinus rhythm and a QTc of 440 ms.
Over the course of the first day, serial BMPs were obtained that showed persistently rising CPK values, which peaked at 54,395 U/L. After treatment with fluids, the CPK gradually downtrended throughout the night. A repeat ECG (Fig 2) was obtained in the morning which showed marked prolongation of the QTc at 661 ms, yet she remained hemodynamically stable. Following the change in ECG, 3g of IV magnesium sulfate as well as 2g of IV calcium gluconate and 1g of IV calcium chloride were administered. A repeat ECG two hours later demonstrated that the QTc had decreased to 507 ms. Upon discussion with the electrophysiologist, it was deemed that there was no acute need for isoproterenol. The etiology of the QTc prolongation was suspected to be due to pronounced H1 antagonism in the context of an anticholinergic toxidrome. Due to concerns for an inherited channelopathy, genetic testing was also performed.
Figure 2: ECG on the second day showed a markedly prolonged QTc of 661ms (arrows).
On the third day, her CPK continued to decrease. The patient however developed significant metabolic alkalosis from the sodium bicarbonate infusion, which was promptly discontinued. Her electrolytes were closely monitored and repleted as necessary. A single dose of IV Acetazolamide 500 mg was administered to correct her metabolic alkalosis. Subsequent ECGs thereafter continued to show improvement in the QTc, until it eventually normalized during the fourth day of hospitalization (Fig 3). After she was medically stable, she was transferred to the inpatient psychiatric unit of the hospital.
Figure 3: ECG shows resolution of the prolonged QTc (440 ms, arrows
LQTS is a condition affecting repolarization of the heart that leads to an abnormally lengthened QT interval. It results from an increase in inward current (through sodium or calcium channels) or a decrease in outward current through the potassium channels [5]. While there are two mechanisms that can lead to LQTS, myocardial repolarization is chiefly mediated by the efflux of potassium ions. There exist two subtypes of the delayed rectifier potassium current, IKr (rapid) and IKs (slow), that are mainly implicated in repolarization of myocytes [6]. These two currents have different activation and inactivation characteristics and hence different sensitivities to pharmacologic agents, and furthermore are the products of different genes. The typical mechanism of acquired LQTS is through blockade of the IKr by certain drugs, and is the likely biochemical interaction by which our patient’s LQTS manifested.
There are also genetic variants of the syndrome, the Romano-Ward syndrome and the Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome, which is the more severe variant and also associated with congenital deafness [7]. Furthermore, there are more than 530 disease-causing mutations associated with the IKs complex, with most being missense mutations. The vast majority occur in the gene KCNQ1, which leads to LQT1 [8]. KCN encodes the ɑ-subunit of the potassium channel, yielding IKs, which is crucial for modulation of the QT interval when there is an increase in heart rate. A defective IKs results in the QT interval not shortening appropriately in tachycardic conditions and thus leads to a highly arrhythmogenic state [9]. Heterozygous KCNQ1 mutations cause the dominant RW LQT1 syndrome and account for the majority of disease-causing variants, whereas homozygous mutations in KCNQ1, cause the recessive JLN variant, characterized by deafness because of the reduced IKs in the inner ear [10].
While inherited LQTS may result from mutations that disrupt any number of ion currents, including IKs, IKr, and INa the mechanism by which drugs cause acquired LQTS is almost exclusively due to block of IKr [11]. This KCNH2 channel is blocked by drugs with diverse structures encompassing many different drug classes, including antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, antibiotics, and antihistamines [12]. Despite the important roles of other potassium (and sodium) channels in the cLQTS, these channels are far less susceptible to block by drugs [13]. This may be due to the structural features of the channel, including the presence of two polar amino acids (Thr623 and Ser624) in the pore region and two aromatic amino acids (Tyr652 and Phe656) with side chains oriented toward the large central cavity of the pore region that provide high-affinity binding sites for a wide range of compounds [14]. It is certainly interesting why some antihistamines, most particularly Diphenhydramine, have been far more commonly implicated in cases of drug induced LQTS than others in the same class. While there may be a molecular basis to this, it is also plausible that it is because Diphenhydramine is much more commonly used.
Many first- and second-generation antihistamines have been implicated in LQTS, the most commonly reported one perhaps being Diphenhydramine. Whether this is due to other antihistamines being more commonly used, or because Doxylamine has a lesser degree of binding affinity to the implicated potassium channels, is difficult to determine. Our case sheds light on a potentially fatal cardiac manifestation of a commonly available drug that clinicians ought to be aware of.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
