AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8914/334
Princess Alexandra Hospital, QLD, Australia.
*Corresponding Author: Daniel Cool, Princess Alexandra Hospital, QLD, Australia.
Citation: Daniel Cool, William Theile, (2025), Efficacy of Garcinia Cambogia (HCA) in Reducing Body Weight in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Scoping Review, J. Nutrition and Food Processing, 8(9); DOI:10.31579/2637-8914/334
Copyright: © 2025, Daniel Cool. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 18 August 2025 | Accepted: 19 September 2025 | Published: 23 September 2025
Keywords: garcinia cambogia; hydroxycitric acid; hca; weight loss; body mass index; overweight; obesity
Aim: This scoping review investigates the weight loss claims made by listed products containing Garcinia Cambogia (from which hydroxycitric acid (HCA) is thought to be the active component). Examples include Garcinia Max (AUST L 266921) and Thinco Garcinia Supreme (AUST L 213557).
Materials and Methods: Only studies which compared Garcinia Cambogia to placebo were included and the variables of weight change and BMI change were analysed. Double-blinded RCT’s and systematic reviews of RCT’s were included in the analysis.
Results: Of the 14 included studies, all failed to demonstrate a clinically significant decrease in weight or BMI. Thus, none of the included studies provides sufficient evidence to support the claims made by listed weight-loss products containing Garcinia Cambogia (HCA).
Conclusion: In addition, it is clear that there is a large problem with the standardisation of herbal products in general. Future trials, if done, need to have parameters matching those set out in the TGA evidence guidelines and the CONSORT guidelines for reporting randomised, controlled trials of herbal interventions.
The use of so-called “fat burner” supplements has been increasing over recent years in attempts to combat the ever-growing issue of obesity. US data from 2007 showed that among people trying to lose weight 16 percent of people reported that they used herbal supplements to attempt to aid weight loss in the past year [1]. Consumers expect that medicine available for purchase over-the-counter will have their quality, safety and efficacy assured by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Between 1996 and 2006 over 1000 new complementary medicines were listed in Australia, with a primary indication of weight loss; however, many did not have clear evidence of efficacy [2]. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulates medicines as registered products (labelled AUST-R) and listed products (labelled AUST-L) [3]. Listed medicines can be purchased off the shelf from pharmacies, health shops, and supermarkets and their efficacy does not need to be assessed before approval. This contrasts with registered products, which are assessed for safety, quality, and efficacy before they go on sale. Registered products are generally prescription-type medicines [3].
The TGA Evidence Guidelines state that “medicines targeting obese populations are required to demonstrate an absolute reduction in weight loss of at least 10% over one year” or 5% in six months. Regarding weight loss in overweight individuals, the supporting evidence must demonstrate:
A common ingredient in complementary medicines marketed for weight loss is Garcinia Cambogia (TGA-approved name: Garcinia gummi-gutt), the believed active ingredient in this product being hydroxycitric acid (HCA). There are currently around 58 products containing Garcinia or HCA found on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) [4]. Products containing HCA often claim that they reduce body weight and reduce feelings of hunger [5]. in turn resulting in weight loss. However, recent systematic reviews of RCTs have demonstrated mixed results in determining the efficacy of Garcinia compared to placebo as per the above TGA guidelines and the methods of some of these studies appear questionable [6,7].
Given a systematic review was conducted recently on this topic in 2020 [6]. a scoping review was determined to be the best way to further analyse the conclusions from both RCTs and the published reviews and provide a clearer answer to the question of garcinia’s efficacy as a fat loss supplement. We aim to assess the efficacy of Garcinia Cambogia (HCA) as a weight-loss supplement in overweight and obese adults.
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and adhered to all relevant institutional and national research ethics guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the appropriate institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Data confidentiality and participant anonymity were maintained throughout the study, and all research procedures complied with applicable healthcare regulations. This review was also conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The study methodology, including the selection process, data extraction, and synthesis, follows the recommended standards to ensure transparency and reproducibility. A completed PRISMA 2020 checklist and a PRISMA flow diagram have been provided as supplementary materials. The PICOT fomat (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, type of study) was used as a template to determine relevant criteria.
We included articles that evaluated adults of normal or above normal BMI and exclude articles that only examine participants that were under 18 years of age or below normal BMI. Articles using "Garcinia Cambogia" OR "Hydroxycitric acid" OR HCA as the intervention, with placebo control will be included. We will include articles with or without diet/exercise as a co-intervention in both groups but exclude articles that include concomitant use of other weight loss supplements or active ingredients in either intervention or control group. We will include articles with objective and measurable outcomes (weight, BMI, circumference); studies with subjective results will not be included. Only double-blinded randomised placebo-controlled studies and systematic reviews of RCTs were included in this paper. There will be no exclusion or inclusion criteria based on the date of publication, language, or time. The literature was searched for in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. A forward and backward search was conducted. Grey literature, including unpublished work on Open Science Forum (OSF) and research conducted by private companies, was also searched and appropriate bodies contacted for data or clinical trial results.
The search terms included were: ("Garcinia Cambogia"[Title/Abstract] OR "Hydroxycitric acid"[Title/Abstract] OR HCA[Title/Abstract] AND Weight loss[Title/Abstract] OR BMI[Title/Abstract] OR "Body Mass Index"[Title/Abstract] OR Body composition[Title/Abstract] OR Waist circumference[Title/Abstract] OR Lean body mass[Title/Abstract] OR Body fat percentage[Title/Abstract] OR Weight change[Title/Abstract] OR Weight gain[Title/Abstract] OR Fat mass[Title/Abstract] OR Antiobesity[Title/Abstract]) OR (Obese[Title/Abstract] OR Overweight[Title/Abstract] OR Increased BMI[Title/Abstract] OR Obesity[Title/Abstract]).
All databases will be searched from inception until October 2020.
Prior to screening, all references were placed in an EndNote database for deduplication using the Endnote function. Title and abstracts screening was conducted by two independent reviewers (WT and DC). Full-text screening occurred in the same fashion. All screening was done on independent EndNote files using SRA-Helper [8]. Disputes were resolved using Disputatron, and online dispute resolution software [9]. Within the data trends relating to weight loss in relation to Garcinia Cambogia. Only data from RCTs and systematic reviews was observed. The independent variable is Garcinia Cambogia/hydroxycitric acid (HCA) consumption. Assumptions being that this was the only oral intervention given. The dependent variables are weight, BMI, waist circumference, and other
objective measurements of weight loss, such as body fat percentage. The time frame for follow-up will be a minimum of 6 months.
There were a variety of reasons why the 559 (figure 1) records were excluded at title and abstract screening. These included issues such as, incorrect study type (ie. observational study or literature review), focus on combination therapy only, not human studies, studies looking at adverse effects of garcinia or studies were on an unrelated area of study (ie hepatocellular adenoma – included within the HCA search term). The reasons for exclusion at full-text screening have been described in the table below.
| Reason for Exclusion at full-text screening | Amount Excluded for the given reason |
| Incorrect Study Type (Ie literature review, proposal for RCT or Prospective study) | 22 |
| Co-intervention only | 5 |
| Unable to obtain study | 10 |
| Full article not published | 1 |
| English translation unavailable | 1 |
| Incorrect outcomes measured | 1 |
Table 1: Reasons for Full Text Exclusion
The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to critically appraise all the RCTs included in the study. The AMSTAR 2 tool was used to critically appraise all systematic reviews. Results are based on studies that were deemed to be high quality. The extracted data was then be analysed to compare the mean and standard deviation of weight change, BMI change, body fat percentage change and waste circumferences change from the beginning of the trials, as well as the effects of dose. The results of individual studies and syntheses were tabulated using structured summary tables that
presented key study characteristics, outcome measures, and effect estimates. Data was organised to include study design, sample size, intervention details, comparator groups, and primary weight-related outcomes (e.g., weight change, BMI, body fat percentage, and waist circumference).
14 studies were included for final analysis. These are summarised in Table 2, with specific intervention discussed in Table 3.
Table 2: Included Studies
Table 3: Included Studies Intervention
The determination of the quality of description of how extracts of HCA were obtained from Garcinia Cambogia was done in accordance with the proposed CONSORT checklist by Gagnier et al [10]. Confidence intervals of 95% give the best estimate of the true effect of the reported variable in each study and will be used to judge the statistical significance of studies where possible to do so. Systematic Reviews are listed below. Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 summarise the information from these.
Table 4: Systematic Reviews Weight Change
Table 5: RCTs Weight Change
Table 6: Systematic Reviews BMITable 6: Systematic Reviews BMI
Table 7: RCTs BMI
Table 8: Systematic Reviews Risk of Bas
Table 9: RCTs Risk of Bias (see appendix)
.Systematic Reviews
Golzarand et al., 2020 (6) – Systematic review of 8 RCTs (n = 530). Compared Garcinia cambogia extract (166–4667 mg/day, unknown HCA) vs placebo for 8–12 weeks. Pooled weight change: −1.34 kg (95% CI −2.62, −0.07). Reported statistically but not clinically significant (TGA guidelines). BMI change: −0.99 kg (95% CI −1.48, −0.49). Limitations include heterogeneous dosing/follow-up, unclear sourcing/extraction, no funding, high or unclear risk of bias in several included trials. The methods were clear but <10>
Maunder et al., 2020 (11) – Review of 5 RCTs (n = 285). Garcinia (300–4667 mg/day, unknown HCA) vs placebo for 8–17 weeks. Weight change: +0.04 kg (95% CI −0.33, 0.41)—statistically and clinically insignificant. Potential conflict (author active in supplement promotion). Methods reproducible.
Onakpoya et al., 2010 (7) – Review of 9 RCTs (n = 459). HCA (1000–2800 mg/day) vs placebo for 2–12 weeks. Mean weight loss: −0.88 kg (95% CI −1.75, 0)—borderline statistical, clinically negligible. Sensitivity analysis rendered results non-significant. Poor quality of included trials. No conflicts noted.
Payab et al., 2018 (12) – Review of 5 RCTs. Garcinia (1667–3000 mg/day) vs placebo for 12–16 weeks. Mean weight change: +0.13 kg (95% CI −0.09, 0.34)—statistically/clinically insignificant. Did not specify included trials, limiting reproducibility.
Randomised Controlled Trials
Hayamizu et al., 2003 (13) – RCT (n = 44). HCA 1000 mg/day + diet/exercise vs placebo, 12 weeks. Weight loss −1.45 kg (no CI or p-value)—not statistically or clinically significant. Possible author conflict (supplier/marketer).
Preuss et al., 2004 (14) – RCT (n = 60). HCA-SX 2799 mg/day + diet/walking vs placebo, 8 weeks. Weight loss −4.53 kg (95% CI −10.83, 1.77)—statistically/clinically insignificant. BMI change also insignificant. Standardised dose; extraction details lacking.
Heymsfield et al., 1998 (15) – RCT (n = 135). Garcinia 1500 mg/day + high-fiber, low-energy diet vs placebo, 12 weeks. Mean loss −3.2 kg; between-group difference NS (p = 0.14)—clinically insignificant.
Kim et al., 2011 (16) – RCT (n = 86). Garcinia 2 g/day vs placebo, 10 weeks. Weight +0.65 kg (95% CI −0.19, 1.49)—statistically/clinically insignificant. BMI +0.24 (95% CI 0.02–0.45)—statistically significant but clinically trivial.
Kovacs et al., 2001 (17) – RCT (n = 11). HCA 500 mg/day vs placebo, 2 weeks. Weight −1.5 kg (95% CI −2.48, −0.52)—statistically significant but clinically insignificant. Funded by Novartis (not an HCA distributor).
Lu et al., 2012 (18) – RCT (n = 114). Garcinia 2800 mg/day vs placebo, 8 weeks. Weight −0.2 kg (95% CI −4.9, 4.5)—not significant; BMI unchanged.
Mattes et al., 2000 (19) – RCT (n = 89). Garcinia 1.2 g/day + low-calorie diet vs placebo, 12 weeks. Weight −3.7 kg ± 3.1 vs −2.4 ± 2.9 (p < 0 xss=removed>
Roongpisuthipong et al., 2007 (20) – RCT (n = 50). HCA 3.45 g/day + low-calorie diet vs placebo, 8 weeks. Weight +2.8 kg (95% CI 2.6–2.99)—statistically significant weight gain, not clinically relevant for weight loss.
Vasques et al., 2013 (21) – RCT (n = 43). Garcinia 2.4 g/day + low-calorie diet vs placebo, 60 days. BMI +0.17—no significant changes in anthropometric measures. Obese-only cohort limits generalisability.
The TGA Evidence Guidelines for registered products states that “medicines targeting obese populations are required to demonstrate an absolute reduction in weight loss of at least 10% over one year” or 5% in six months.
Regarding weight loss in mildly overweight individuals, the intended target population for listed medicines, the supporting evidence must demonstrate:
In addition to this, it is stated in the TGA guidelines that a loss of 1 BMI unit across populations equates to clinical significance as per Rose and Day [23]. Due to the parameter of a 6-month minimum duration, none of the included studies meets the TGA’s weight loss criteria (despite some results being statistically significant). Other parameters, such as body fat percentage and waist circumference have been analysed but will not be discussed as, in the absence of BMI and weight change, they are not regarded as clinically significant by the TGA. In addition to this, none of the included studies outlined how they extracted HCA (the active compound in Garcinia Cambogia) from the plant or provided stability data as outlined in the CONSORT criteria. (10) This means that the participants’ doses both within studies and between studies may be different and thus comparison is fraught. This affects both the validity and reproducibility of all studies included and explains why the results of the systematic reviews have a large variability. Preuss et. Al did use a standardised commercial formulation of HCA ensuring dose consistency within the study however the exact methods of extraction were still not outlined.
Of the studies, whilst the majority were statistically insignificant, all studies were clinically insignificant. Statistical significance is ideally assessed using 95% confidence intervals. Several studies used P values in the absence of confidence intervals which are inferior as they do not give the best estimate of the true effect. [24]. However, neither method is perfect nor can give a 100% impression of the true effect. One study (Vasques) had neither P values, confidence intervals or standard deviations and thus statistical significance was unable to be assessed. Studies showing statistically significant weight loss were Heymsfield, Kovacs, Mattes and Onakpoya. All these studies were clinically insignificant as per the TGA guidelines. Also of note is the fact that the Preuss study was conducted on an entirely Indian population. The question of whether this is a comparable population to that of Australia should be raised. The TGA evidence guidelines state that “the meaningfulness of the observed effect to the general Australian population should also be assessed. (4)” The results of study performed on subjects on a sub-continental diet and lifestyle may not be able to be similarly replicated on an Australian population. Four studies (Maunder, Roongpisithipong, Vasques and Payab) showed a gain in weight despite garcinia supplementation. It is clear from these results that Garcinia Cambogia/ HCA supplementation is not effective in helping weight loss. Products such as Garcinia Max (AUST L 266921) and Thinco Garcinia Supreme (AUST L 213557) are two of many Garcinia Cambogia containing products listed by AUST-L that claim to reduce body weight. The claims made include promotion of weight loss and maintenance of a healthy weight, both of which have been now shown to be false claims. Both are listed on the ARTG as AUST-L products. AUST-L products are listed over the counter medications and unlike AUST-R prescription medications, without evaluation by the TGA prior to marketing to see if they are efficacious. The TGA does undertake limited post-marketing surveillance of listed products and has consistently found a high level of regulatory non-compliance over the last 5 years [25]. Despite this the ARTG should still have investigated the product’s efficacy and monitored their advertising for false claims such as these. These disingenuous claims to the public have no evidence to support them and should be removed from retailers and the ARTG.
This scoping review found no clinically meaningful evidence that Garcinia Cambogia or its active compound hydroxycitric acid (HCA) reduces body weight or BMI in overweight or obese adults. Across 14 high-quality studies, any statistically significant differences were small, inconsistent, and well below the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) thresholds for clinical relevance. None of the trials met the TGA’s minimum duration or weight-loss criteria, and most lacked adequate standardisation of HCA extraction or stability data, undermining reproducibility. These findings indicate that the weight-loss claims made by listed Garcinia-containing products, such as Garcinia Max and Thinc Garcinia Supreme, are unsupported by robust evidence. The inconsistency and methodological shortcomings across studies highlight the urgent need for well-designed, long-term RCTs that follow the TGA Evidence Guidelines and CONSORT recommendations for herbal interventions. Until such evidence exists, Garcinia Cambogia should not be promoted as an effective weight-loss supplement, and regulatory bodies should ensure that marketing claims for listed products accurately reflect the current evidence base.
Daniel Cool and William Theile contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, as well as the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. Daniel Cool drafted the initial manuscript. William Theile critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
