Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/986
1Department of Surgery No.1, Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, 46011 Ternopil, Ukraine.
2Enfermeras Expertas en Herides Complejas. Atenció Primària Barcelona Ciutat, Institut Català de la Salut; 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
3Outpatient Department, Hospital of Portalegre, Unidade Local de Saúde Alto Alentejo,7300-312 Portalegre, Portugal.
4Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Universidade de Évora, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal.
5Unidade Local de Saúde, Póvoa de Varzim Vila do Conde, 4480-701 Vila do Conde, Portugal.
6Hocking Valley Community Hospital, Outpatient Wound Clinic, 43138 Ohio, USA.
7Hadassah Medical Center, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel.
8Vilnius University Hospital Santaros, 08661 Klinikos, Lithuania.
9Wladyslaw Bieganski Collegium Medicum, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland.
10MedCu Technologies Ltd., 4672200 Herzliya, Israel.
*Corresponding Author: Gadi Borkow, MedCu Technologies Ltd., 4672200 Herzliya, Israel.
Citation: Sergii Karpeniuk, Laura B. Domínguez, Sofia M. Escobar, Rubén M. Carrillo, Eduardo G. Álvarez, et al, (2025), Effective Management of Venous Leg Ulcers by Copper Dressings – Case Series, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 31(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/986
Copyright: © 2025, Gadi Borkow. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 15 October 2025 | Accepted: 29 October 2025 | Published: 31 October 2025
Keywords: case series; copper oxide; dressings; venous ulcers; wound healing; antimicrobial
Background/Objective: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) remain a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and poor response to standard care. This case series evaluated the use of copper oxide–impregnated wound dressings (Copper Dressings) in 25 patients with chronic, hard-to-heal VLUs.
Methods: Patients’ VLUs were treated with Copper Dressings without adjunctive antimicrobials. The patients, treated across diverse geographies by different wound care specialists, included individuals with complex profiles such as chronic venous insufficiency, lymphedema, malnutrition, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and wound infections.
Results: Treatment resulted in consistent clinical improvement, including enhanced autolytic debridement, granulation tissue formation, epithelialization, and reduction of periwound edema and exudate. The mean RESVECH 2.0 score improved from 19.52±5.38 at baseline to 2.44±4.92 (p<0.001). After an average of 9.6±5.87 weeks of treatment, 20 of 25 wounds (80%) fully healed. Importantly, infections, including those with antibiotic-resistant pathogens, were controlled without systemic antibiotics.
Conclusions: These findings clearly support Copper Dressings as a safe, effective, and biologically active option for managing refractory VLUs.
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a subtype of chronic wounds resulting from chronic venous insufficiency, characterized by poor blood return from the legs to the heart, which leads to pooling, increased pressure in the veins, and eventually, skin breakdown. VLUs significantly impair patients' quality of life due to pain, limited mobility, and increased risk of infection. The prevalence of VLUs varies across studies is generally reported between 1% and 3% in the adult population in developed countries [1-3]. This prevalence increases significantly in individuals over 65 years old, due to age-related changes in vascular health [3]. These ulcers account for up to 85% of lower extremity ulcers, contributing to a high burden on healthcare systems [4]. The incidence of VLUs increases with risk factors such as obesity, prolonged standing, and previous leg injuries. They are associated with a high recurrence rate and require long-term, intensive treatment [5,6]. Key clinical features include a shallow wound with irregular edges, pain, and an inflamed peri wound area with lipodermatosclerosis [7-10]. VLUs, as many other chronic wounds, may become infected [11]. Wound infections result in wound deterioration and delay wound healing. VLUs also often develop biofilms [12,13]. It has been demonstrated that less than 40% reduction in the size of a VLU (as well as diabetic foot ulcers) during first 4 weeks of wound management indicates that the wound is refractory to the ongoing treatment [14-16]. An estimated 93% of VLUs heal within 12 months, while the remaining 7% may persist unhealed for up to five years [17]. Copper oxide impregnated wound dressings, hereafter referred to as "Copper Dressings", are in clinical use since 2019 in the USA, Europe and other countries. They are cleared for the management of acute and chronic wounds, such as diabetic ulcers, pressure sores and venous ulcers, either infected or not infected wounds, by the regulatory bodies. The Copper Dressings have potent antimicrobial efficacy, both in vitro [18] and in vivo, [19,20] including against bacteria protected by biofilm [21]. Clinical studies have demonstrated the capacity of the Copper Dressings to stimulate wound healing [22], including of hard-to-heal infected and non-infected chronic wounds that did not respond favorably to other wound management interventions [19,20,23,26]. Most of these studies were conducted with diabetic wounds and one case was reported for the successful management of a heavily infected venous ulcer by the Copper Dressings [19]. Treatment of diabetic wounds using Copper Dressings was found to be statistically significantly non-inferior to negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) [27]. In the current case series, our aim was to examine if the Copper Dressings can also be an effective and simple management “tool” for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. To test our hypothesis, we compiled a variety of cases of stagnant, hard-to-heal VLUs that did not heal despite prior standard-of-care wound management strategies, some for even several years. We included patients with diverse underlying etiologies from different geographic locations, which were treated by different wound care experts. We report 25 cases of the successful management of VLUs by the Copper Dressings, all of which failed to heal by other wound management interventions.
Copper dressings (Figure 1) are sterile, soft, single use, wound dressings composed of an internal absorbent layer for exudating wounds containing copper-oxide particles and one external non-adherent layer impregnated with copper-oxide particles. The external layer covers the internal layer from one side, is intended to be in direct contact with the wound bed and it allows the passage of the wound exudate to the absorbent layer. The wound dressings can vertically absorb ~10 times their own weight [18]. The dressings were secured to the wound site with a secondary dressing. In highly exudating wounds, the dressings were replaced every two to three days, and as the wounds dried up, the dressings were replaced less frequently (four to six days). The dressings were used to treat the VLUs in conjunction with compression therapy.

Figure 1: Copper oxide impregnated wound dressings (Copper Dressing).
(a) The dressings are composed of one or two external non-adherent orange-colored layers and a highly absorbent layer that can absorb ~10 times its own weight [18]. The dressings are provided with or without an adhesive contour. The dressings without an adhesive contour require securing by a secondary dressing. The cuprous oxide impregnated microparticles are the white dots seen in the scanning electronic microscopy images of the orange layer (b) and the internal absorbent layer (c). Figure republished from [21] following permission by the authors.
Wound assessment included measurements, photographic documentation, and evaluation of healing progression, which was quantified using the RESVECH 2.0 score scale [28-30]. The RESVECH 2.0 scale is a validated wound assessment tool that provides a structured, quantitative description of chronic wounds, focusing on the following 6 dimensions: Wound Size / Area (evaluates surface area and reduction over time, with smaller area or progressive reduction = better score); Depth / Affected Tissue (describes how deep the wound extends, Superficial → dermis only; Medium → subcutaneous; Deep → muscle, tendon, or bone involved); Wound Edges (assess condition: attached, detached, undermined, macerated, necrotic, or rolled - healthy, attached edges score better); Type of Tissue in Wound Bed (proportion of necrotic, sloughy (fibrin), granulation, and epithelial tissue - higher presence of granulation/epithelium = better score); Exudate (amount and type - serous, purulent, sanguineous- minimal or serous exudate indicates progress, heavy or purulent exudate worsens score); and Infection/Inflammation Signs (redness, warmth, swelling, pain, odor, pus - absence of infection = best score). The scale is between 35 (worst condition) to 0 (closed and healed wound) [28-30]. For each wound, the change in RESVECH 2.0 score from the beginning to the end of the copper dressing treatment (Δ score) was calculated. Since the RESVECH 2.0 scores are ordinal numbers, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to determine if the reduction in the RESVECH 2.0 score after treatment was statistically significant. Since the use of the Copper Dressings are cleared by the relevant regulatory bodies for clinical use and are part of the standard of care, there was no need for ethical committee approvals for this retrospective study. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
25 patients, aged between 48 and 94 years, with a range of comorbidities—including chronic venous insufficiency, lymphedema, hypertension, arthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or anemia (Table 1) - were treated with copper dressings for VLUs that had persisted for 3 to 120 months. In all the patients’ countries, the use of the copper dressings is cleared to manage VLUs and any other chronic infected and non-infected chronic wounds. All patients had previously undergone unsuccessful wound management interventions, including compression therapy, enzymatic debridement, various topical dressings (primarily silver- and iodine-based), NPWT, and/or skin grafting (Table 1).
| # Patient | Main comorbidities | Age | Gender | Presence of wounds (months) | Previous dressings | Signs of infected wound | Other |
| 1 | Severe lymphedema, anemia, calf pump dysfunction, chronic venous insufficiency | 69 | F | 120 | Gauze, Iodine dressings | Yes | - |
| 2 | Chronic venous insufficiency | 65 | M | 60 | Silver and Iodine dressings | Yes | Exposed bone |
| 3 | Chronic venous insufficiency, post-thrombotic syndrome, lymphedema, dermatitis, eczema, | 48 | M | 60 | Gauze, Iodine dressings | Yes | - |
| 4 | Chronic venous insufficiency, atherosclerosis, hypertension | 70 | F | 48 | Silver, Manuka honey and Iodine dressings | Yes | Exposed Achilles tendon |
| 5 | Heart disease, hyperlipidemia, deep veins thrombosis | 82 | F | 40 | Aguacel Ag Plus Extra | Yes | - |
| 6 | Chronic venous insufficiency, arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, celiac, hypertension, hyponatremia | 72 | F | 39 | Skin graft, simple dressings | Yes | - |
| 7 | Chronic venous insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, hypothyroidism | 68 | M | 36 | Iodine dressings, Hydroclean, Aguacel Ag | Yes | - |
| 8 | Chronic venous insufficiency, hypothyroidism, obesity, sarcopenia, depression | 53 | F | 24 | Silver dressings | Yes | - |
| 9 | Chronic venous insufficiency, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis | 61 | F | 13 | Silver dressings | Yes | Exposed Achilles tendon |
| 10 | Type 2 diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, hyperlipidemia, hypertensive heart disease, dermatitis | 81 | M | 8 | Aguacel Ag, Silver foam | Yes | - |
| 11 | Chronic venous insufficiency, chronic lymphedema, hypertension, osteoarthritis, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus | 77 | F | 7 | NPWT, simple dressings | Yes | - |
| 12 | Chronic venous insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bladder neoplasia, hepatic steatosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, podermatosclerosis, dermatitis | 67 | M | 6.5 | Aguacel Ag, Acticoat, Iodine dressings | Yes | - |
| 13 | Chronic venous insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease, mixed hyperlipidemia, dermatitis, anemia | 56 | M | 6 | Aguacel Ag Plus Extra, Granuflex | Yes | - |
| 14 | Chronic venous insufficiency, chronic hepatitis C, ischemic heart disease | 65 | F | 6 | Iodine dressings, Acticoat | Yes | - |
| 15 | Chronic venous insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, peripheral artery disease, inflammatory bowel disease, deep vein thrombosis | 94 | M | 6 | Iodine dressings, Acticoat, Aguacel Ag | Yes | Exposed bone |
| 16 | Chronic venous insufficiency, chronic osteoarticular, frailty, anemia, sarcopenia, | 86 | F | 5 | Aguacel Ag | Yes | Significant inflammation |
| 17 | Chronic venous insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic polyneuropathy, hypertension, anemia, saphenectomy, varicectomy | 79 | M | 5 | Iodine dressings | Yes | - |
| 18 | Chronic venous insufficiency, hypertension, subclinical hypothyroidism, colon neoplasia | 85 | F | 5 | Iodine dressings, Aguacel Ag | Yes | - |
| 19 | Chronic venous insufficiency, hyperlipidemia, hyperlipoproteinemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, stasis dermatitis, cellulitis | 74 | M | 4 | Aguacel Ag | Yes | - |
| 20 | Chronic venous insufficiency, lipodermatosclerosis, dermatitis, post-thrombotic syndrome | 72 | F | 3 | Iodine dressings, Gauze | Yes | Scar avascular wound bed |
| 21 | Chronic venous insufficiency, cognitive impairment, obesity, dermatitis, lipodermatosclerosis | 56 | M | 2.5 | Iodine dressings | Yes | - |
| 22 | Chronic venous insufficiency, spinal stenosis, carpal tunnel syndrome | 61 | M | 2 | Iodine dressings, Aguacel Ag, Acticoat | Yes | - |
| 23 | Chronic venous insufficiency, carpal tunnel syndrome | 61 | F | 2 | Aguacel Ag | Yes | - |
| 24 | Chronic venous insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension | 75 | M | 1.5 | Iodine dressings, Acticoat | Yes | - |
| 25 | Chronic venous insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure | 83 | M | 1.5 | Osmotic autolytic debridement | Yes | - |
Table 1: General patient characteristics at the beginning of treatment with the Copper Dressings and previous dressings used.
At the start of Copper Dressing treatment, all patients had good clear pulse palpation of the foot. A few of the patients presented with exposed bone or Achilles tendon, and all had signs of infection (Table 1). In all of the patients the Copper Dressings treatment was combined with compression therapy. Treatment with copper dressings lasted an average of 9.6 ± 5.97 weeks (Table 2), after which 20 of the 25 wounds (80%) completely healed (Figure 2). Of those 20 completely healed VLUs, 16 (80%) were completely epithelialized within the first 12 weeks of treatment, the remaining 4 clinical cases (20%) completely epithelialized within 14.6, 15, 17 and 32 weeks (clinical cases No. 3, 7, 6 and 8, respectively) of treatment. The mean RESVECH 2.0 score ± standard deviation (SD) improved significantly, from 19.52 ± 5.38 at baseline to 2.44 ± 4.92 following treatment (Table 2) (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p<0>



| Patient | Time of Treatment (Weeks) | RESVECH 2.0 SCORE | |
| Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | ||
| 1 | 6.4 | 20 | 12 |
| 2 | 6 | 23 | 12 |
| 3 | 14.6 | 12 | 0 |
| 4 | 12 | 18 | 0 |
| 5 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| 6 | 17 | 23 | 0 |
| 7 | 15 | 21 | 0 |
| 8 | 32 | 28 | 0 |
| 9 | 8.6 | 26 | 14 |
| 10 | 4 | 13 | 0 |
| 11 | 6 | 21 | 13 |
| 12 | 10 | 24 | 0 |
| 13 | 12 | 12 | 0 |
| 14 | 8 | 19 | 0 |
| 15 | 12 | 28 | 0 |
| 16 | 6.4 | 24 | 10 |
| 17 | 9 | 20 | 0 |
| 18 | 10 | 26 | 0 |
| 19 | 12 | 14 | 0 |
| 20 | 6.8 | 12 | 0 |
| 21 | 4 | 23 | 0 |
| 22 | 5 | 21 | 0 |
| 23 | 5 | 18 | 0 |
| 24 | 4 | 18 | 0 |
| 25 | 10 | 17 | 0 |
| Mean ± SD | 9.6 ± 5.87 | 19.52 ± 5.38 | 2.44 ± 4.92 |
Table 2: Copper Dressings Treatment.
In the present study, we report multiple cases of stagnant, hard-to-heal VLUs in patients with diverse underlying etiologies that responded favorably to treatment with Copper Dressings. Previous studies have demonstrated the capacity of Copper Dressings to stimulate wound healing through the continuum of care [19,20,22,24-26,31]; however, nearly all of those investigations focused on diabetic wounds. To date, only a single case reported the successful use of Copper Dressings in treating a heavily infected venous ulcer [19].
The cases presented here involve VLUs that did not heal despite prior standard-of-care wound management strategies—including compression therapy, NPWT and various dressing types (including antimicrobial dressings) - some for even several years. The patients studied represent a wide array of different chronic comorbidities. Remarkably, upon initiating treatment with Copper Dressings, all wounds demonstrated rapid and notable improvement in wound bed quality. This included wounds that did not respond well to antimicrobial dressings (e.g. silver containing dressings), similarly to a previous publication showing enhanced wound healing by copper dressings of wounds that responded poorly to silver dressings [23].
These improvements included enhanced autolytic debridement, emergence of granulation tissue, epithelialization, reduction in edema, and measurable wound size reduction. Importantly, no maceration of the wound margins was observed. 80 percent of the wounds closed within 12 weeks of treatment, in contrast to 93% of VLUs that heal in 12 months [17].
This case series encompasses patients from eight different countries and nine distinct wound clinics or hospitals, managed by various wound care specialists. These findings strongly suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of Copper Dressings in managing VLUs is consistent across diverse clinical settings and independent of individual practitioners’ expertise.
The copper oxide microparticles impregnated in the Copper Dressings serve as a reservoir of copper ions that are continuously liberated to the wound bed at ppm levels [19-20]. These copper ions kill pathogens present in the wound [18], primarily by plasma membrane permeabilization, membrane lipid peroxidation, and inhibition of microbial proteins assembly and activity [32]. The several parallel non-specific multisite copper antimicrobial kill mechanisms make the development of resistant microorganisms to copper extremely difficult [33]. The copper ions can also kill bacteria protected by biofilm [21].
It has been demonstrated that applying copper dressings to non-infected wounds in genetically engineered diabetic mice stimulates the secretion of key wound-healing factors through upregulation of the oxygen-sensing protein hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [34]. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1 activates transcription of genes that promote angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and keratinocyte migration, thereby accelerating tissue repair [35]. In chronic wounds such as diabetic ulcers, however, HIF-1 activity is impaired and fails to respond adequately to hypoxia [36]. Notably, copper ions not only provide broad-spectrum antimicrobial protection [37], but also directly enhance wound-healing processes by upregulating HIF-1 [34]. Today, the essential role of copper across all stages of wound healing is well established [38]. Copper ions also stimulate the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), collagens and elastin by the dermal fibroblasts, promoting angiogenesis and extracellular matrix (ECM) formation during the proliferation and remodeling phases [39]. Copper is essential for the activity of Lysyl oxidase (LOX) for the ECM stabilization during the proliferation phase [39-43]. Copper is a cofactor of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [44], superoxide dismutase [39] and tyrosinase [45], enzymes involved in debridement and skin remodeling, protection from oxidative stress, and for melanin production and skin pigmentation, respectively. It is thus contemplated that the stimulation of some or all of the above-mentioned factors by copper results in the stimulation of wound healing processes even in stagnated chronic wounds, including VLUs. By contrast, silver ions have been shown to downregulate HIF-1 [46], which may help explain growing evidence that silver dressings can impede wound-healing processes [47-49].
One of the bases of VLU management is compression therapy [50]. In the present case series, the Copper Dressings were used in combination with compression therapy. The level of compression (from light to strong) and the type of compression (stockings, single and multi-layer compression bandaging) depend on the level of edema, patient’s mobility (resting and walking pressure), configuration of the lower extremity, patient’s tolerance to the type and level of compression [51]. Based on our experience, Copper Dressings are suitable for use under various types of compression therapy. Due to its soft material components and sizing it can be easily applied and configured around the circumference of the lower leg under compression therapy; in consequence of its absorbent properties and minimal height, it prevents horizontal exudate leakage (maceration) and skin damage over the boarder of the dressing under compression therapy; and can be easily removed when changing the dressing.
The study is a retrospective, non-randomized case series, which inherently lacks a control group or comparator treatment arm. The study presents only a relatively small number of patients, which limits statistical power. Future studies should directly compare copper dressings against standard of care or other interventions and control for potential confounders, such as compression regimen differences, mobility and dressing change frequency across patients.
This case series provides clear evidence for the beneficial role of copper oxide–impregnated dressings in the healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers. The findings align with previously established data highlighting copper’s critical involvement in key physiological wound healing processes, including angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and antimicrobial protection. The consistent clinical improvements observed across a diverse patient population further support the use of Copper Dressings as an effective management strategy for venous leg ulcers - complementing earlier studies that demonstrated their efficacy in the treatment of diabetic wounds. These results underscore the potential of Copper Dressings to serve as a versatile and impactful tool in hard-to-heal wound care.
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NPWT Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
VLU Venous leg ulcers
CT Compression Therapy
ECM Extracellular matrix
HIF-1 Hypoxia-inducible factor-1
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,