AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/104
1 King’s Centre for Professional Development, RAK, and UAE.
2 College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, UAE.
*Corresponding Author: Naseer Ahmed, King’s Centre for Professional Development, RAK, UAE.
Citation: Naseer Ahmed, Farry Bruce Jeffery, Haleama Al Sabbah (2022). Awareness of Coronavirus among Healthcare Workers in Ghotki city of Pakistan: a Cross-Sectional Study. J. Women Health Care and Issues. 5(2); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/104
Copyright: © 2022 Naseer Ahmed, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 December 2021 | Accepted: 28 February 2022 | Published: 11 March 2022
Keywords: coronavirus; COVID-19
Objective
The fast spread and growing trends of coronavirus has turn out to be a main cause of fear for the healthcare workers. This study is aimed to report the awareness of Coronavirus and practices to control spread of infection amid Healthcare workers in the Ghotki city of Pakistan.
Methods
The sample of 200 healthcare workers from the Ghotki city of Sindh Province in Pakistan completed a research based survey to report the awareness, responsiveness, knowledge, and practices to contain spread of infection during Coronavirus pandemic in healthcare systems. The survey questionnaire was designed as per CDC (Centers for Disease Control) and WHO (World Health Organization) current provisional guidelines published for healthcare workers (Center for disease control, CDC. 2020). Data was collected through appropriate sampling method and results were reported as frequencies and percentages. The statistics were performed on the bases of percentage of correct responses. The median test was used to separate pairwise evaluations for percentage of correct responses.
Results
The general knowledge of coronavirus and awareness to prevention for all subcategories was un-adequate with 63% reporting un-correct answers. The maximum accurate replies were from private practicing doctors (Doctors running personal clinics with only out-patient services) and specialist 23%, lowest were from paramedical staff, non- clinical and administrative staff. A smaller amount of the total respondents could correctly define about contact precautions. Though, most of the healthcare workers were conscious of the accurate sequence for the use of a face mask. And, simply 23% of the individuals were found aware of the standards methods of hand wash as advised by who.
Conclusion
Healthcare workers from the Ghotki city showed inadequate awareness of Coronavirus in current pandemic at hospitals in Ghotki city with an overall percentage of 37 % correct responses.
Ghotki city, which is located in the northern Sindh, Pakistan is suffering from the coronavirus pandemic at high level. Healthcare staff on the forefronts are mostly susceptible to Covid-19 infection due to lack of awareness. Coronavirus, which is termed as SARS-CoV- 2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) (Cascella, Rajnik, Cuomo, Dulebohn, Di Napoli, 2020). As per ICTV, This is a fresh strain of coronavirus which is discovered in 2019 and never found in humans previously. Earlier, SARS-CoV and MERS- CoV (Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus) have been found to infect humans.
Eruptions of respiratory disease due to these viruses appears to start in animals before transmission in human host. As we are aware that MERS-CoV was originated from Arabian camels then infected the humans, however SARS-CoV was originated from cats to human host. As per provisional reports, SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 likely to have transmitted from pangolin or bats. Chinese province Hubei reported first case of COVID-19 in Wuhan city, they first suggested coronavirus an animal-to-human spread potentially from City’s wild animal marketplace. The Coronavirus then transmitted human to human while spreading outside of the Hubei province and subsequently to entire world. On March 11, 2020. WHO announced COVID-19 as a Pandemic (WHO, 2020). WHO announced droplet as potential route of transfer for the Coronavirus which proved to be highest risk for healthcare workers for being infected, healthcare workers are always in direct contact to patient or local public. Evaluating the awareness of Coronavirus disease and its spread among healthcare workers is the main objective of this study. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey as per the current interim guidelines for healthcare workers provided by the CDC, USA and WHO (Hand Hygiene, 2020)
Study design and Setting
We conducted this research at small city called Ghotki at Mirpur Mathello, it is located in the sukkur division, Northern area of Sindh Province in Pakistan. The questionnaire was designed in the shape of survey report and distributed to potential participants which included doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers in different part of city.
Study population and eligibility
We conducted this research survey from 1st April, to 30th May, 2020. Total of 200 individuals participated in the survey with a response rate of 100% as 200 invited Healthcare workers participated in the survey. The self-administered survey containing questions of socio-demographic and total of seventeen questions centered to awareness of Coronavirus and knowledge of prevention of infection among healthcare workers in Pakistani healthcare settings. The research questions setting were designed as per the current provisional guidance published by the CDC, last updated on March 7, 2020 (Center for Disease control, 2020). The survey also added with questions linked to hand hygiene guidelines provided by World Health Organization (WHO, 2020), this technique called five moments of hand hygiene were used to evaluate the participants awareness about importance of hand hygiene and its effectiveness in coronavirus infection control (WHO, 2020) As per ethical practice, consents were taken from all the healthcare workers. Suitable sampling technique was used to collect data, and the distribution of results was presented as frequency and percentages. Sub-groups were classified on the basis of gender, age and profession (Doctors, Nurses, Non-Clinical staff and Paramedical staff which includes; Health technicians, Operation theatre technicians, dressing technicians, ECG technicians and pharmacy dispensers. Data were arranged in excel file, and descriptive Statistics were performed using SPSS.
A total of 200 healthcare workers from the Ghotki city answered the survey. The majority of them were from the age group of 40 and above years 43% (n=86). About 16 % (n= 32) of the participants were females, remaining were male 84% (n=168). Doctors were 23 % (n =45), Nursing staff 30% (n = 61), Paramedical staff 21% (n=42) and Non-Clinical and administrative staff were about 26% (n=52) as per the completed the survey.
Only 22.6% of the participants were known that the virus causing coronavirus infection was earlier called as 2019-nCoV and later termed as SARS-CoV-2. The key mode of transmission of the coronavirus is respiratory droplets, this was answered correctly by 86% of the healthcare workers, non- clinical/administrative staff sub-answered with lowest percentage of correct answers.
About 23% (n = 45) participants were able to define close contact. The highest percentage of correct answers were from the consultants 99% (n = 23), and the lowest percentage was from the non-clinical/administrative staff sub- group 26 % (n=53). A mainstream of the participants were able to correctly answer questions related to Coronavirus exposure that needs hospital admission 23% (n=45)
No one from the participants had received hand wash training in the last two years and only 23% ( n= 45) were aware about WHO’s moments of hand hygiene. Interestingly (Figure 1).
Age Group | N | % |
18-25 | 6 | 3 |
25-30 | 34 | 17 |
30-35 | 30 | 15 |
35-40 | 44 | 22 |
> 40 | 86 | 43 |
Table 1: Age Group.
Category of Response | Correct answers N= 24 | % |
Up to date Awareness | 23 |
|
Aware about moderate information | 12 |
|
Basic to moderate information | 9 |
|
Aware aboutbasic information | 6 |
|
NOT awareabout the consequences | 9 |
|
Table: 3: Percentageof correct responses categorywise
General Condition | Number | % |
Up to date Awareness | 45 | 23 |
Aware about moderate information | 29 | 14 |
Basic to moderate information | 32 | 16 |
Aware about basicinformation | 41 | 21 |
NOT awareabout the consequences | 53 | 26 |
Table 4: Percentage of correct responses
23% (n=45) of the participating healthcare workers were aware about the use of Personal protective equipment (PPE) which are recommended for Coronavirus patients care. 53% (n=56) had awareness about the transfer of patient within healthcare setting and essential use of PPE needed during the procedure. About 37% (n=74) of the participants had idea about isolation standards necessary to contain Coronavirus infection, whereas the lowest percentage was from paramedical and Non-clinical staff.
About 74 of the healthcare participants were known to infection control procedures like triage, respiratory care, coughing technique and ventilated waiting area for suspected Coronavirus patients. The percentage of correct answers was diverse in different professions in all participating individuals. A higher percentage of correct answers were from private practicing doctors 22 correct answers out of 24 were asked in the questionnaire.
Coronavirus is reason for thousands of deaths worldwide since its start from china, as per government of Pakistan around 1,243,385 people are confirmed Infected as of 29th Sep. 2021. As reported in Government of Pakistan’s official Website and special mobile application. The most difficult job at this time is to identify and isolate those which are suspect or confirmed coronavirus cases to reduce the spread of infection. However, in this report, less than half of the participants were aware of defining a "contact precaution." As per the CDC, a “contact precautions" are standard as: “contact with positive coronavirus person within approximately 6 feet for a lengthy period of time or direct contact with the case positive with coronavirus. Likewise, few other definitions have been given in provisional U.S. Guidelines for Risk Assessment and Public Health of Healthcare providers with possible exposure in hospitals or related service centers to individuals with COVID-19 or Coronavirus published under the CDC (Center for disease control, 2020). Low awareness was reported among paramedical staff with the lowest in the non-clinical staff. Being lowest group, the non-clinical / Administrative staff are at high risk to get infected from Coronavirus in the current healthcare setting and therefore a potential reason for contracting and spreading the infection. Standard hand hygiene habits show a vital role in avoiding the spread of coronavirus type of infection. The standard set by WHO for hand hygiene is Five Moments of hand hygiene, these five moments describes key instants when and why healthcare providers need to wash their hands. It tells exact time or moments and how to wash and do hand hygiene (Modi, Kumar, Solanki, Modi J., Chandramani, Gill., 2020). The basic methods for hand hygiene is divided into two types, one is hand-wash and other one is hand-rub. The hand-rub is based on alcohol or ABHR in most situations (Center for disease control, 2020) and soap is mostly used for hand-wash.
Though, the query in our research questionnaire was focused on the standard hand-hygiene method for noticeably dirty hands which is recommended as hand-washing for 20 seconds with soap and water, this method of hand-washing should last for around 40-60 seconds (WHO, 2020).
The general awareness of PPE use was moderate among all the staff. The CDC has provided earlier provisional guidelines for control of infection and coronavirus prevention for suspected or confirmed cases in Hospital for PPE (Center for disease control, 2020). A surgical Facemask or specialized facemask like of N95 is recommended to be used while attending the room. The specialized facemask or N95 is recommended during procedure or direct contact with suspect or confirmed case, proper discarding procedure of the used PPE should be performed and proper hand hygiene is highly recommended before and after the procedure. The aerosol-generating procedures are also very important during prevention and control of coronavirus, disposable gown and goggles, sterile gloves, cap and face-shield is recommended during these type of procedure. Only general awareness to PPE is not enough to control coronavirus, correct method and sequence is also significant to know. The order of put on a face-mask is like: keep elastic bands of face-mask at the mid of back of head then neck, fix the elastic band on nose Bridge, other part should be dragged below the chin, (Abdullah and Allen, 2020). All of the respondents were of the opinion that the use of a facemask/respirator is not essential or recommended for people who are well and having no contact with a Coronavirus patient or suspect. Generally, it is recommended that all healthcare workers should use Face-mask, it is recommended for those in healthcare settings and persons with Coronavirus symptoms should use facemask. Still there are discrepancies for use in in common population, common use of facemask can lead to shortage of supplies (Feng, Shen, Xia, Song, Fan, Cowling, 2020). All procedures on coronavirus infected and suspected patient should be performed under isolation room with prevention of airborne spread with negative pressure control system. It is highly recommended that infected or potential case of Coronavirus should not be placed under an exhaust air system which recirculates in entire building of Hospital. All air condition system within hospital building should be equipped with high- efficiency particulate air or HEPA filter. Very few research participants were aware about this concept and its importance in viral infection prevention.
What is already known on this topic
Earlier many research papers has been published on same topic, like; It was concluded in a study at Kingdom of Saudi Arabia by Abdullah J. Al-Sahafi and Allen C. cheng that, the control of viral infectious diseases in the healthcare settings can be restricted by case detection and proper management by applying transmission-based precautions to all confirmed and potentially probable cases. For coronavirus in hospitals, this requires timely recognition, testing and airborne precautions (Abdullah and Allen 2020). In another study done by Abdullah Assiri and his team, they concluded this that human transmission of MERS-CoV can occur in Hospitals and possibly associated with considerable morbidity. Observation and proper infection-control measures are important to a global public health response. (Assiri, McGeer, Perl, Price, Al Rabeeah, Cummings, Alabdullatif, Assad, Almulhim, Makhdoom, et al., 2020).As per our information, to evaluate the awareness of Coronavirus among Pakistani healthcare workers in the middle of current coronavirus pandemic, the government of Sindh, Pakistan has recruited additional doctors and nurses on 89 days contract at urgent bases which can be extended as per pandemic situation. This strategy will help fill the potential shortage of healthcare workers, this also will help in management of specialized hospitals for Coronavirus patients. Current situation of Coronavirus infection in Ghotki city needs development of strategies at priority level to stop spread of Coronavirus infection within Healthcare workers. Numerous drugs trial are underway including antivirals and at some extent Antimalarial.
One of the possible disadvantages of this research report is that participants are from Ghotki city, which is located in south of Pakistan and anterior Sindh which do not truly represent the healthcare workers of the entire state and country.
Healthcare workers from the Ghotki city showed inadequate awareness of Coronavirus in current pandemic at hospitals in Ghotki city with an overall percentage of 37 % correct responses. A major high percentage of correct answers were from doctors and the lowermost was from non- clinical/administrative staff. Our research study report shows that Ghotki city needs a strong strategy to implement continued professional educational programs and specialized training sessions on containing of infections like of Coronavirus. Doctors, Nurses and paramedical staff should be first priority for such trainings, as research report shows non-clinical and administrative staff also work with healthcare workers so they should also get training at some level to prevent spread of infection in hospitals. As a trained team of Clinical and non- clinical staff we can handle pandemics like of Coronavirus in future, a collective effort is necessary because alone doctors and healthcare workers cannot prevent these type of infections. Community education is also necessary, health education related to Coronavirus infection and its spread within community can reduce the chance of spread of infection.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public,
Commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).
I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my mentor Late Dr. Farry Bruce Jeffery (Scotland) as well as my family specially my mother Mrs. Laila Rabnawaz for giving me this life and my best friend Akhtar Jalali. Many thanks to the most influential people in my life; Ms. Naureen Wahab, Ms. Saima Naz, Mr. Pitamber Hotchandani (India), Dr. Naushad Shaikh ( Pak), Ms. Disha Bhalla (India), Mr. Abbas Ali Shariati( Iran), Mr. Mohammad Ali (Dubai).
Special thanks to Prof. Mamas Mamas (England) for professional guidance. This project is dedicated to Late Dr. Farry Bruce Jeffery, who was my mentor and true supporter, whatever I am today it is only because of his guidance and unconditional support. Even though he is not there in this world but his given knowledge and skills will help me for the rest of life.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
