AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Paper | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9422/006
Jazan University, Ministry of Higher Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
*Corresponding Author: Santhi, Jazan University, Ministry of Higher Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Citation: Santhi, (2020) Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme On Knowledge Of Preparation And Management Of Labour Among Primigravida Women In Selected Hospital, Salem, Tamilnadu, India, 3(1): Doi: 10.31579/2692-9422/006
Copyright: © 2020 Santhi, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 17 February 2020 | Accepted: 29 February 2020 | Published: 06 March 2020
Keywords: preparation and management of labour; structured teaching programme; primigravida women
Labor is one of the most painful events in a women's life. Many women would like to avoid pharmacological or invasive methods of pain management in labor, and this may contribute towards the popularity of complementary methods of pain management. This review examined the evidence currently available on manual methods, including frequent change in positions, massage and reflexology, for pain management in labor. The main aim of this study is to identify the level of knowledge on preparation and management of labor among primigravida women. A pre experimental one group pre and post test design was selected and adapted purposive sampling technique to recruit the samples. The total sample size was 30. Tools used like demographic variables, structured interview schedule and structured teaching program on preparation and management of labor. At the first day, pre test was conducted by using SIS and structured teaching on preparation and management of labor was administered as a group of antenatal women. After 7 days post test was conducted by using same tool. Data analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics. Highest percentage (50%) of the women were in the age group of 21-25 years. The overall mean score in pre test was 12.16±4.4 and the mean percentage 40.53 where as in post test the overall mean score was 22.76±7.26 and the mean percentage was 75.87. The calculated ‘t’ value was 10.18 at 0.05 level of significance. It depicts that structured teaching program on preparation and management of labor was highly effective. There was no significant association between the demographic variables with pre and post test knowledge scores.
Labor is the process through which a fetus and placenta are delivered from the uterus through the vagina. Human labor divides into three stages. The first stage is further divided into two phases. Successful labor involves three factors, which include maternal efforts and uterine contractions, fetal characteristics, and pelvic anatomy. This triad is classically referred to as the passenger, power, and passage. Labor is typically monitored by multiple modalities. Serial cervical examinations are used to determine cervical dilation, effacement, and fetal position, also known as the station. Fetal heart monitoring is employed nearly continuously to asses fetal well-being throughout labor.
Making use of good, evidence based routines, for management of normal childbirth is essential to ensure quality of care and prevent, identify and manage complications if they occur. Two essential routine care interventions as defined by the World Health Organization are the use of the Partograph and Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour. Both interventions have been evaluated for their ability to assist health providers to detect and deal with complications.
A study conducted on Effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods and to compare them. 258 women were included in the study and interviewed using a questionnaire and the visual analogue scale for pain. They were divided into six groups depending on chosen method of labour pain relief: epidural anaesthesia (EA; n = 42), water immersion and water birth (WB; n = 40), nitrous oxide gas for pain control (G; n = 40), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) (n = 50), multiple management (MM; n = 42), none (N; n = 44). The average age of the women was 29.4 ± 3.74 years and 60.47% of them were nulliparous (n = 156). Mean values of labour pain intensity were 6.81 ± 2.26 during the first stage of labour; 7.86 ± 2.06 during the second stage, and 3.22 ± 2.46 during the third stage. There was no significant difference in pain level between epidural analgesia and gas groups in the first stage of labour (p = 0.74). Nevertheless, epidural analgesia reduced pain level during the second and third stage (both p < 0>n = 38; 95%). Epidural analgesia is the gold standard of labour pain relief, however water birth was found to be associated with the highest satisfaction level of the parturient women.
Conducted a retrospective cohort study of 264 singleton pregnancies during labor was performed at a low-risk pregnancy maternity during a 6-month period. Perineal trauma was classified according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). From a total of 264 women, there were 2 cases (0.75%) of severe perineal trauma, which occurred in nulliparous women younger than 25 years old. Approximately 46% (121) of the women had no tears, and 7.95% (21) performed mediolateral episiotomies. Perineal trauma was not associated with maternal position (p = 0.285), health professional (obstetricians or midwives; p = 0.231), newborns with 4 kilos or more (p = 0.672), and labor analgesia (p = 0.319). The multinomial analysis showed that white and nulliparous presented, respectively, 3.90 and 2.90 times more risk of presenting perineal tears. The incidence of severe perineal trauma was low. The prevalence of upright position during the second stage of labor was 42%. White and nulliparous women were more prone to develop perineal tears.
Conducted a quasi-experimental study. Eighty women were interviewed as a study sample when admitted to the labor and delivery area and divided into three groups: 20 women received frequent changes in position (group A), 20 women received back massage (Group B), and 40 women constituted the control group (group C). Pain perception was measured after each intervention using the Face Pain Scale. The mean rank of the difference in pain scores among the study groups was as follows after the first, second, and third interventions, respectively: group A-52.33, 47.00, 49.2; group B-32.8, 30.28, 30.38; group C-38.44, 42.36, 41.21. There were significant differences between groups A, B, and C after the first, second, and third interventions (p1 = .011, p2 = .042, p3 = .024). Back massage may be a more effective pain management approach than change in position during the first stage of labor.
Randomised controlled trials comparing manual methods with standard care, other non-pharmacological forms of pain management in labour, no treatment or placebo. We searched for trials of the following modalities: massage, warm packs, thermal manual methods, reflexology, chiropractic, osteopathy, musculo-skeletal manipulation, deep tissue massage, neuro-muscular therapy, shiatsu, tuina, trigger point therapy, myotherapy and zero balancing. We excluded trials for pain management relating to hypnosis, aromatherapy, acupuncture and acupressure; these are included in other Cochrane reviews. Massage, warm pack and thermal manual methods may have a role in reducing pain, reducing length of labour and improving women's sense of control and emotional experience of labour, although the quality of evidence varies from low to very low and few trials reported on the key GRADE outcomes.
Conducted an observational and analytical retrospective cohort study conducted at the Mancha-Centro Hospital during the 2010-2014 period. Data were collected from 2990 women who gave birth vaginally. The main outcome variable was postpartum anaemia for two cut-off points (haemoglobin (Hb) <11g>9h (OR 2.50. 95%CI: 1.58-3.94), primiparity (OR 2.50. 95%CI: 1.61-3.87) and previous caesarean section (OR 2.43. 95%CI: 1.51-3.90). The other independent risk factors for both Hb cut-off points were prolonged second stage of labour, instrumental birth, tearing>first degree, non-practice of active management and heavier birth weight of newborns. Postpartum anaemia has a high incidence. The active management of third stage of labour, selective practice of episiotomies, and performing instrumental births only when strictly necessary are efficient measures to lower the incidence of postpartum anaemia.
Acupuncture use in obstetrics has been increasing in Western medicine, especially to alleviate complications of pregnancy, the most important cause of maternal mortality worldwide. One quarter of maternal deaths are caused by complications in the third stage of labor, an interval between complete delivery of the baby and the complete expulsion of the placenta. Passive (or expectant) management of the third stage of labor is occasionally associated with massive obstetric hemorrhage, a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, especially in low-income countries. Active management of the third stage of labor has been shown to reduce the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Use of acupuncture in the first and second stages of labor could lead to a faster separation of the placenta in the third stage of labor. The possible effects of acupuncture in cases of retained placentas may have significant implications for possible complications and final outcomes of labor. Further studies are needed for more conclusive results.
A study conducted to assess the risks and benefits of squatting position during second stage of labour and its comparison with the supine position. There was no difference in the application of episiotomies in both groups, however extension of the episiotomy occurred in 7% patients of the non-squatting group (P < 0>
Statement of the problem:
A study to assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme (STP) on Knowledge of Preparation and Management about Labour among Primigravida Women.
Objectives:
Hypothesis:
H1: There is a significant difference between pre and posttest knowledge scores on preparation and management of labour among primigravida women at p≤0.05 level.
H2: There is a significant association between the pre and posttest knowledge scores with the selected demographic variables at p≤0.05 level.
Conceptual framework:
Adopted Rosenstock’s and Becker Health Belief Model theory as a basis of conceptual framework, which is aimed to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge of preparation and management of labour among primigravida women.
Methods:
Pre experimental one group pre and posttest research design was used. To recruit the samples Purposive sampling technique was used. The study was conducted in Private Hospital, Salem. 30 primigravida women who have 36 & 37 weeks of gestation visited in OPD of Private Hospital was selected as samples. Tools used like demographic variables, structured interview schedule and structured teaching programme on preparation and management of labour. At the first day, pre test was conducted by using SIS and structured teaching on preparation and management of labour was administered 20 mts as a group of antenatal women (4-5 mothers). After 7 days post test was conducted by using same tool. Data analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics like mean, standard deviation and mean percentage was used to assess the knowledge on preparation and management of labour pain. Inferential statistics like paired ‘t’ test was used to assess the difference between pre and post test knowledge scores. Chi square was used to assess the association between pre and post test knowledge scores with selected demographic variables.
Highest percentage (50%) of women were in the age group of 21-25 years. Maximum (70) were had higher education. Most of them (67%) belong to Hindus and half of the percentage (54%) were housewife. Majority of (53.3%) women were having family monthly income of Rs. 5001-10,000 and both half of the percentage (53.3 %) of women belongs to nuclear family and labour support through her mother and all of them had regular antenatal check up (53%).
Distribution of pre and posttest level of knowledge scores of preparation and management of labour among primigravida women shows that in pre test, 56 percentage of women had inadequate knowledge, where as in post test none of them had inadequate knowledge. In pre test in moderately adequate knowledge 44 percentage of them obtained information and where as in post test only 12 percentage of them obtained moderately adequate knowledge. In post test maximum (88%) of the mothers had adequate knowledge and in pre test none of them obtained adequate knowledge. Hence it shows that after implementation of Structured Teaching Programme on preparation and management of labour mothers gained adequate knowledge so it was highly effective.
According to Area wise distribution of pre and post test knowledge scores shows that the highest mean score in both pre and post test was persist on the 4th stage of labour symptoms and management which was 1.5±4.3 and 1.9±5.4, the mean percentage was 50% and 63% respectively. The lowest mean score was in both pre and post test which was 1.1±2.6 and 2.3±4.9, the mean percentage was 22% and 24% in the area of introduction. Hence it shows that after implementation of Structured Teaching Programme on preparation and management of labour was very much effective and highly significant.
The Difference between mean, SD and paired ‘t’ test of pre and post test knowledge shows that in pre test, the overall mean score was 12.16±4.4 and mean percentage was 40.53. Whereas in post test the mean score was 22.76±7.26 and the mean percentage was 75.87. The calculated ‘t’ value J Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation Copy rights@ Santhi. Auctores Publishing – Volume 3(1)-006 www.auctoresonline.org Page 4 of 4 was 10.18 at p<0>
There was no significant association between age, education, occupation, religion, type of family, weeks of gestation, monthly income, labour support given by others, residence, antenatal checkup, previous hospitalization with the pre test scores on preparation and management of labour. Hence it shows that the difference observed mean score values were not true difference so the research hypothesis was rejected.
Highest percentage (50%) of the women were in the age group of 21-25 years. The overall mean score in pre test was 12.16±4.4 and the mean percentage 40.53 where as in post test the overall mean score was 22.76±7.26 and the mean percentage was 75.87. The calculated ‘t’ value was 10.18 at 0.05 level of significance. It depicts that structured teaching prgramme on preparation and management of labour was highly effective. There was no significant association between the demographic variables with pre and post test knowledge scores.
Implications:
Nursing Service:
Nursing administration:
The nurse administrator can organize in service education program regarding newer modalities of non-pharmacological measures used in all stages of labour.
Nursing research:
Nursing research can be conducted to find out the effectiveness of newer modalities used management of labour, which would help in updation of the clinical practice with evidence based approach.
Recommendation:
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
