AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/JHV-2021/024
*Corresponding Author: Omar Hamam, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria21131, Egypt.
Citation: Omar Hamam, Moustafa Eldalal, Amr Ussama, Karim Elyamany, Waleed Ikram, Ahmed Mahdy, Renu Bhandari, Mohammad A. Elbahnasawy, Hosam Asal. (2021) Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J, Heart and Vasculature; 1(5); DOI: 10.31579/JHV-2021/024
Copyright: © 2021, Omar Hamam, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 13 July 2021 | Accepted: 21 August 2021 | Published: 24 September 2021
Keywords: coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, arrhythmia, cardiovascular, incidence
Background: Cardiac arrhythmia cannot be overlooked in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as it carries a great influence on the outcomes. Hence, this study aimed to build concrete evidence regarding the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19.
Methods: We performed a systematic search for trusted databases/search engines including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and web of science. After screening, the relevant data were extracted and the incidences from the different included studies were pooled for meta-analysis.
Results: Nine studies were finally included in our study consisting of 1445 patients. The results of meta- analysis showed that the incidence of arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 was 19.7% with 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 11.7 to 27.6%. There was also a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 94.67%).
Conclusion: Cardiac arrhythmias were highly frequent in patients with COVID-19 and observed in 19.7% of them. Appropriate monitoring by electrocardiogram with accurate and early identification of arrhythmias is important for better management and outcomes.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global health concern affecting the lives of millions around the world [1]. It is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The clinical manifestations can differ from very mild to highly severe with the mean affection of the respiratory system which can lead to pneumonia as well as respiratory distress syndrome [2, 3]. Moreover, the associated involvement of other systems such as the cardiovascular system cannot be overlooked as it carries a great influence on the outcomes [2-6].
In a recent published report, cardiac involvement was showed to occur in COVID-19 even without manifestations of respiratory tract involvement 7. Several studies asserted upon the incidence of cardiac injury in COVID-19 [5, 8]. Among those reported cardiac manifestations, cardiac arrhythmias were observed with variable estimates among studies and according to severity levels [2, 6].
Cardiac arrhythmias appear to be one of the highly challenging complications of COVID-19 and several speculations about different mechanisms were reported with a key role for pro- inflammatory mediators. Some of ion channels can be affected due to COVID-19 which may lead to subsequent alterations in cardiac conduction or repolarization. Thus, it can increase the risk for cardiac arrhythmogenesis to occur [9-12]. Wang et al was the first to report an incidence of 17% of arrhythmias in COVID-19 patients. Most of those cases with arrhythmias were transferred to intensive care unit. Likewise, more and higher incidence of arrhythmias (44%) was reported in studies involving patients in the intensive care unit [2, 6]. Therefore, a better understanding of the magnitude and role of cardiac arrhythmias in COVID-19 is essential for better monitoring and management. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to build concrete evidence regarding the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia in COVID-19.
We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane’s handbook of systematic reviews to conduct this study [12, 14].
Literature search
We combined the following keywords and conducted our search: “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “cardiovascular” and “Arrhythmia”. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles to be included. An additional online and manual search was performed on Google Scholar and Preprint Servers to ensure adequate inclusion of all studies.
Eligibility criteria
Results were imported into Endnote X8 (Thompson Reuter, CA, USA) for duplicates deletion. We included valid case series (>10 patients) and cohort studies including adults with COVID-19 with incidence of arrhythmia. Review articles, editorial, commentaries were excluded.
Studies selection
The first author (O.H) divided other authors into two teams; each team independently performed title and abstract screening. Then, each team obtained the full-text of the included papers and performed full-text screening. Any disagreement between the two teams was resolved through consultation with the study senior (A.E).
Data extraction
The two teams extracted the data; one team performed extraction of selected outcomes and the other team extracted baseline data, then, data were revised in a cross-revision manner. Extracted data include author, country, year, study design, age, sex, total number of patients, and number of patients with arrhythmia.
Risk of bias assessment
We used the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) which is available at (https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp) for assessing the risk of bias for our included studies. The possible scores of this scale range from 0 to 9. Studies with a score of seven to nine, four to six, and zero to three were classified as studies with low, moderate, and high risk of bias, respectively.
Data synthesis and analysis
The meta-analysis of the included studies was performed using OpenMeta [Analyst] version 1.15 for conducting single-arm meta-analysis. Meta-analysis for proportions was utilized to pool the incidence of arrhythmia in the groups. Dichotomous data were calculated to obtain risk ratios along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2 test and P-value from the chi-squared test of heterogeneity. Values of I2>50 and P<0>
Results of the literature search
We searched the aforementioned search engines/databases and found 955 studies after duplicate removal. We excluded 946 studies as they were not eligible for inclusion according to eligibility criteria, and a total of nine studies were finally included in our study consisting of 1445 patients [2, 5, 6, 17-22]. Figure (1) shows a summary of our search and table (1) shows the summary of the included studies.
Baseline characteristics
Baseline characteristics are displayed in table 1. Eight of the included studies were conducted in China while only one study reported from USA. Among the included studies, the highest mean age was 71 years while the lowest was 55 years. Most of the included studies have a male predominance reaching 75% of the total included patients.
Risk of bias assessment
Among our nine studies evaluated for the risk of bias, all of our studies had a low risk of bias with score of seven or higher (Table 1).
Arrhythmia in COVID-19
The results of meta-analysis including the nine studies showed that the incidence of arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 was 19.7% with the 95% confidence interval (CI) of 11.7 to 27.6%. There was significant heterogeneity (I = 94.67%) which can be attributed to the variability of reported incidences among the different included studies (Figure 2).
Previous studies has showed that compared to different systems, the cardiovascular system is considered the second most commonly affected organ by COVID-19 after the respiratory system 2,5-8,23. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that cardiac arrhythmia occurred frequently in patients with COVID-19 with incidence exceeding 19% of the total cases with covid-19. This is consistent with other individual studies reported firstly from china such as Wang et al [2] who reported that cardiac arrhythmia occurred in 23 patients out of 138 patients included in their study. In our study, the cumulative number of patients with both arrhythmia and COVID-19 was 269 out of 1445 patients with COVID-19 which is slightly of higher percentage than Wang et al [2]. It is known from previous meta-analyses that baseline characteristics such as sex, hypertension, and diabetes can affect the outcomes of the pooled studies [23-27] but the meta- regression option was not available to assess the exact effect of those factors given that the number of the included studies was less than 10.
There are different documented speculations to explain the association of arrhythmia with COVID-19. For instance, this may be correlated with metabolic disruption, hypoxia, pro- inflammatory process, or different stressors associated coming on the line with COVID-19 [28].
Moreover, some of ion channels can be affected due to COVID-19 which may lead to subsequent alterations in cardiac conduction or repolarization. Thus, it can increase the risk for cardiac arrhythmia to occur [9-11].
We noticed significant heterogeneity while performing this meta-analysis. This can be explained by the different and variable estimates among the included studies which were the highest in Du et al al. 20 reaching 60%. It is also worth noting that our included studies did not mention the types of arrhythmia in specific which prevent us from subgrouping the incidence for each type.
This study can be considered the most updated and comprehensive study to assess the incidence of COVID-19 in a suitable number of patients. However, this study suffered from several limitations. Although the number of patients from our pooled studies was 1445 patients, the number of studies was only nine which lead us to avoid testing for publication bias and performing meta- regression according to the reported recommendations for those tests that need at least 10 studies to be well performed. Moreover, the types of cardiac arrhythmias were not specified so we could not provide more specific subgroup analysis based upon the included studies. The studies were all observational retrospective and this type of studies has its own known limitations. Further studies that can explore cardiac arrhythmias in COVID-19 patients with more details on determinants are highly recommended.
To recapitulate, cardiac arrhythmias were highly frequent in patients with COVID-19 and observed in 19.7% of them. Appropriate monitoring by electrocardiogram with accurate and early identification of arrhythmias is important for better management and outcomes.
O.H. conceived and designed the study. All authors acquired the data, performed the data extraction, and performed extensive research on the topic. K.E. reviewed and performed extensive editing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
O.H. performed the statistical analysis.
Funding
None
Acknowledgment
None
Conflict of interest
None
Declaration of competing interest
Authors declare no Conflict of Interests for this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
